didierforever

Ramires had been BRILLIANT for us in the firat 3months. I still remember the meltdown here before the pool match when rambo got suspended. Mikel is a different issue altogether. Anyways my point was that salah was deemed ready enough and good enough by jose to replace etoo ahead of both torres and schurrle. And he was poor. Simplt can't remember one thing that he did that was good. Salah can't hide bejind the young player argument. We have EH who is 23, oscar 22, willian 25, schurrle 23. Salah is 21. Barely much difference. Yes, he does need time. I don't argue on that, and yes I did go ovwrboard in critisizing him, rather than mou who chose to put salah in the deep end of the pool espexiallt when he had good enough options in schurrle and torres or even lamps who could have helped us get settled in midfield.

I knew the comparison with torres would come forth and hence in my last post I already said that cavani has already lived upto the ecpectation and pressure of 50mil which I think was torres' achillew heel. Plus torres and cavani are nothing alike. Cavani can make a huge impact even if he does not score.Also I don't think we should have a problen with FFP in buying cavani. Ffp has been there for the last 2 years and in both these years we have spent a lot. About 75mil in 2012-13, and more than 100mil this season. For the next season, we are set with gks, will be buying one new LB, set with the mid and will be adding a St. All in all we would be making buys for anither 75mil (shaw+cavani), while selling off ba, torres/etoo ( his wages woukd be gone), moses, marin, kakuta, mikel, hopefully luiz. So don't think FFp is a problem. As for how muxh he is worth is very subjective. As I saod before, if roman does not mind and if FFP is not a problem plus I can see cavani in blue then don't care what the price tag is.

looks more like a galatasaray away team than everton at home team

Risk is always a factor. Even if we sign a PL proven striker, there is no guarantee that he will be able to adjust perfectly to our system. But there is no denying that a player like cavani SEEMS like he would be a proper fit tp our system. There is a risk, no doubt about it. But even playing on the wings, cavani has very much proved his 50odd million worth in psg. The price tag should neither baffle him nor us.

What he is actually worth is completely different to what he would be worth to us. Cavani would make us a world beater in every sense of the word. He is physically strong plus awesome link up play and would literally be a perfect fit for us. So if we have to pay 50mil for that, so be it.If roman does not have a problem spending that money, plus if the club is fine with FFP even after buying cavani, then 50mil it is.

Hot

Fickle-changing frequently, especially as regards one's loyalties or affections. As TOPTB very well showed a few days ago, chelsea fans have actually been quite consistent with luiz. Barely what u would say fickle, would u? The problem is people just can't accept that their favourite player is not as good as they make hin out to be. And then come the scapegoat argumwnt. Yes hazard and willing did have a poor match but so did luiz abd while hazard and willian have been close to brilliant for about 95% of the season, luiz has been poor/below average for the majirity of it. So people are more worried about luiz than hazard and willian and damn rightly so. Plus by not targeting hazard and willian for obe poor performance, the fans actually show the trait of UNFICKLENESS. So I simpky don't understand this fickle talk. Probably just another phase of "lui the scapegoat" conspiracy.

ok. Cos my sole purpose in life is to fulfil all yout desires. The worst thing is that its almost been 12 hours since the argument had been done but people like u always have to put your nose where it doea not belong. And that's pathetic.

All this coming from people who think torres I'd an asset... hahahahahaha... the irony

cos I can actually see beyond torres. U azked me if I have seen etoo last 4 performances, I gave u my take that he has been good.Then u changed your tone saying that a striker shoukd be scoring goals, etoo has more than toreea this aeason. U asked me how etoo is better than torres, I gave u my answer, moreover mourinho too seems to think the same. Yet u continue to persist with one player over the better ment of the team, worse withoit gicing a good enough reason why torres should start the matxh ahead of etoo. And seriously Why should he??? Also I am going to break your bubble now, please hold on to something very toghtly. Even if u don't go to matches and buy chelsea merchandise, chelsea will Endure. I know its tough, but it's also quite true. LOL

the fact that u need to retort to this tells me how poorly u r getting your ass kicked here. Could not find anything else on torees. Wait I am sure he must have done a lot more for us like played a pass which ultimately afyer anithwr 10 passses between mazacar led to a goal. LOL.anyways atleast I support chelsea and not just a fangirl of a player.

the fact that u need to include "winning a corner" in your argument tells me exactly what torrea has acheived here. Zip. Nada. Zilch. Zero

cos using fooking instead of fucking makes a lot of difference

well if roman had not bought chelsea then we woukd never have bought torres.Or If carlo had not preased the panic button and bought him Or If DD had not scored against valencia in the group stage in the atartinf minutes Or If ash had not xleared off the line Or If rambo had not scored the goal against barca Or I think we shoukd credit our whole CL success to mwireles cos if he had not scored that goal againat benfica then we would have had to play 1inute and then if benfica had scored then we were out. So all hail MEIRELES!!!! the ignorance of torres fans and their selective memory. LOL

hey, he started it.

winning us a xornwr... on my god!!!! Give the man a ballon dor... also scoring a useless goal against barca when he should have been defending the for the team. Well thise are 2 things right down the drain. His europa contribution can't be forgotten. He seened set for that league but unfortunately chelsea don't. Lets find him a club that can help him in doing so. Also u get a fucking grip u moron. Wtoo has been a better striker for us. Not once have I said that he is a world beater but yes, he is a 100 times better than torres. Jose's team selextin has proved that more than anythin. So I might not go to game but my blind love for one player is not triumphing my love for CFC.

hat trick against man united. Well that itself says he has done more than what torres has in 3 years. LOL.Also u forgot the 1-0 win against city, 3-1 thrashing of united, 3-0 newcastle etx etc...Lol

our results, the number of goals he has scored, the trust jose is showing in him, our general play has been the best since etoo had a run. So a lot of factors contribute to it

Do we have a messi, aguero, cavani, ibrq??? Well we have a torres or a ba!!! And an etoo is much better than these 2. Especially considering the fact that our best bet for a goal scored or a goal created is EH17 and with him etoo has a goos link up play. Etoo does enhance hazard's style of play. So even moee reason to start him. Also please stick to your guns. U started the debate with "have u seen his last 4 PERFORMANCES". His lasr 4 perdormances have been good.

wheb did I say he had a good game. For today's city game I said " the team was abysmal". Read the whole thing again, u said 4 peeformances , I gave u 4.

Today the team was abysmal.Wba he had a decent game Newcastle was very good. Link up with hazard was superb. 2 assists. City - worked his socks off. Good game.

whose last 4 performanxea???

whose last 4 performanxea???

Mourinho is not the kind of guy who would play someone like that Well u were right atleast about one thing. Mouronho is not the kind of guy who woukd play some1 like that and he is not. Wanted to prove a point hence took the libery of aaying "torres is starting". Was not that difficult to underatand.

how many matches has schurrle started after stoke??? 1 more than salah has. Schurrle has scored a goal against city too by the way. Also salah dis replace mata, or explain how he dint. Mata was our 2nd choice rw now salah is. Pretty straight swap. Considering tje stakes, I have every right to be critical about him.