Madmax

Isn't it ironical he is from the land of the legendary Aborigines?

^ Oh boy

:lol: It takes balls to upload something like that Still better than Bieber though

It's especially horrible considering your greatest ever player, Zizou is of Algerian descent.

Yes, I've got a great voice. Happy?

Ugh, last time. I said in my first post today about Roman's money luring Jose. That is my main view, which I added upon when you asked me. I didn't change my view at all, merely augmented it. I brought it up again because you asked me about it again. Didn't do so on my own accord. How am I being vague? This is getting very repetitive, I hope I made myself clear.

Most of us think that here. We even had a thread about it if I remember

I gave a logical reason in the very beginning, but I suppose for you, only stuff you want to hear equals logic. This very conclusion of yours explains why I called you deluded. Nothing personal.

Malouda more often than not says the right things. His attitude on the pitch though can be different, as we've already seen. So I take his politically correct talks re Torres with a pinch of salt.

LOL delusion. I gave no 'different outlook', my principal view didn't change anywhere. I merely expanded upon my previous comment. You are the only one who replied to my specific posts. I don't know why you fail to see what I've put there in clear words. Can't help you with that mate.

Ireland aren't a part of UK

My original post mentioned the reasons I think why Mourinho came here, in the first paragraph itself. Yet you ask me a question I'd already answered. All the users can see my reasoning, because it's there in plain words. You're the only who can't even though it's all there in the first post. I'm not going to repeat myself everytime you consider it proper to ask me stuff I've answered already. So, for the last time, my original post which pre-addressed your redundant query -

- Carlo. Please, no. If it ain't broken ...

Read the first para of my last post again

We weren't a top club when he came here, we hadn't even won the league in 50 years, let alone being a top European club. Roman obviously saw Mourinho's talent and he had the money to lure him over. Mourinho understood he'd have massive resources at his disposal in addition to the chance to cement his reputation by moving to a much better league. Like I said, I give all the credit in the world to Mourinho for making excellent use of Roman's money, but it's useless pretending the money is not a major part of what got him here in the first place. It's a marriage of Roman's generosity and Mourinho's acumen that we won the stuff we did, so I don't see why people should be troubled by the idea of attributing our success to them both, and not Mourinho alone.

Stop stoking the fire

Of course it matters, Roman's money lured him to the club, but it's enitrely a credit to Mourinho that he utilized his resources as well as he did. And lmao, you've got to be fucking blind if you think I hate Mourinho. I've mentioned all the time that I respect him. And yes, I love Kalou, what's your fucking point? Why do I bother with you? Idiot.

Let's not pretend that Mourinho would have come to Chelsea even if he didn't have Roman's millions backing him ...

^ You forgot the 4 special sessions a week that focus on imaginary card waving.

Can't believe the season's gonna end in couple of weeks

Very tough choice I reckon. Henry gets my vote, Zola a very close second and Bergkamp third.

I'm not sure posting external links is allowed on this forum, we have our own in-house discussion topics and match reports.

I ain't here to amuse or entertain you. If stating exactly what's happened is 'degrading the quality of the argument', so be it.

Nobody will believe you. If you dare to say anything against Mourinho, you will be shot down because this is a Chelsea forum and he's a Chelsea legend. He's above scrutiny or criticism. It doesn't matter if you repeatedly state that you have nothing but respect for him and his achievements here. Sigh.