I feel implementation of both proposals alongside each other would clutter the tranfer talk forum because the second proposal in effect makes the first one redundant. Illustration - Player A is 'linked' by a(ny) source. Proposal 2 would create a topic in the 'linked players' sub-forum, and if the story happens to be from goal or tribalffotball or whatever, some or the other member is bound to point that out. Player B is considered by some member to be a perfect buy, so he makes a wishlist type thread. In this case there is no 'source' whatsoever, the question of reliabilty doesn't arise. Thus the two proposals, if implemented in conjunction, would lead to a slightly confusing scenario where threads could one of three types - 'linked and reliable', 'linked but unreliable', 'wishlist'. What I propose is simply to bifurcate transfer threads into 'linked' or 'wishlist' sub-forums. It is then upto the discretion of individual members to treat 'linked' threads with the seriousness they deem fit, based upon their trust in the listed source.