Vesper

Scouting report: best performing young players Thanks to the collaboration with Wyscout, the CIES Football Observatory has developed a robust and innovative method for comparing player performance. This report presents the footballers from 65 leagues around the world born in 2004 or later with the best performance index in the current or last completed season for the leagues alredy finished. The performance index used to establish rankings is calculated on a 100-basis from player activity in six areas of the game: ground defence, aerial play, distribution, chance creation, take on and finishing. This other study details the methodology exclusively developed to measure performance in each of these areas. The scouting report presents the 20 best performing young footballers for 20 categories defined according to players’ main position and technical characteristics. For each player, we alspo present his estimated transfer value according to the exclusive CIES Football Observatory statistical model. At the top of the list in their respective categories are: Goalkeepers: Guillaume Restes (Toulouse) and Rome Jayden Owusu-Oduro (AZ Alkmaar). Centre backs: Abdukodir Khusanov (Lens), Pau Cubarsí (Barcelona) and Taras Mykhavko (Dynamo Kyiv). Full/wing backs: Jorrel Hato (Ajax), Malick Diouf (Slavia Prague), Oliver Braude (Heerenveen), Martim Fernandes (Porto) and Geovany Quenda (Sporting CP). Midfielders: Warren Zäire-Emery (Paris St-Germain), Aleksandar Pavlović (Bayern Munich), João Neves (Paris St-Germain), Kendry Paez (Independente del Valle) and Aleksey Batrakov (Lokomotiv Moskow). Wingers: Kenan Yildiz (Juventus), Thiago Fernández (Vélez Sarsfield), Lamine Yamal (Barcelona) and Arda Güler (Real Madrid). Centre forwards: Samu Aghehowa (Porto) and Kauã Elias (Fluminense). >>> Top 20s per category (update if the file is not displayed) https://football-observatory.com/IMG/sites/mr/mr98/en/report.pdf

nil 4 Isak completes his hat trick

nil 2 Forest Elanga

NUFC are smashing Ipswich nil 3 and counting

my cousins in Nottingham are over the fucking moon the last few months

I love this Forest side great buys congealing

nil 1 Forest Chels old boy Ola Aina

Murillo steaming down the middle ona 60 to 70 metre run

great save Flekken

I was out, but Isak scored in the first few seconds for NUFC

https://www.vipleague.pm/epl/brentford-vs-nottingham-forest-1-live-streaming https://www.vipleague.pm/epl/ipswich-town-vs-newcastle-united-1-live-streaming https://www.vipleague.pm/epl/tag-west-ham-united-vs-brighton-hove-albion-live Wеst Hаm Unіtеd – Brіghtоn England. Premier League / 21 December at 16:00 Ірswісh Tоwn – Nеwсаstlе Unіtеd England. Premier League / 21 December at 16:00 Brеntfоrd – Nоttіnghаm Fоrеst England. Premier League / 21 December at 16:00 https://soccer-100.com/league/eng.1

Something to jog your memory and also to back you up about the UEFA Cup/Europa League in re the Fairs Cup https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970–71_Inter-Cities_Fairs_Cup 1970–71 Inter-Cities Fairs Cup The 1970–71 Inter-Cities Fairs Cup was the 13th and final season of the Inter-Cities Fairs Cup, a European football competition for teams not qualified for the European Cup or the European Cup Winners' Cup. Back in 1969, UEFA determined this would be the final year of the Fairs Cup before taking over the organizational duties and evolving the competition into the UEFA Cup, which is now known as the UEFA Europa League.[1] 1970–71 Inter-Cities Fairs Cup Tournament details Teams 64 Final positions Champions Leeds United (2nd title) Runners-up Juventus Tournament statistics Matches played 126 Goals scored 382 (3.03 per match) Top scorer(s) Pietro Anastasi (10 goals) ← 1969–70 1971–72 (UEFA Cup) → The final was played over two legs at Stadio Comunale, Turin, Italy, and at Elland Road, Leeds, England. It was won by Leeds United of England, who defeated the Italian team Juventus on the away goals rule after a 3–3 aggregate draw to claim their second Inter-Cities Fairs Cup title. It was the first time the competition final had been won on the away goals rule. This was to be the final European title for Leeds United, which would cap off its most successful era later in the decade with two further finals in UEFA-organized tournaments. It was also the second Fairs Cup final lost by Juventus, who still had not won a European title. Notably, the first leg of the final was replayed from scratch two days later after the initially scheduled game, which was abandoned after 51 minutes of play with a score of 0–0 due to heavy rain and a waterlogged pitch. As no team had ever managed to permanently win the Inter-Cities Fairs trophy that was to be discontinued, its destination was decided in a special play-off between the first and last competition winners: Barcelona and Leeds United, respectively.[1]

Doubtful, as even the PFJ are not stupid enough to have that mooncalf around, let alone be trained by him/her.

Yes, the majority of US Democrats would be centre to centre right neoliberals over here in the EU, and some would be edging towards solid RWers. So many are corporatists. None would be considered far left in the slightest. Vänsterpartiet (The Left Party, ie actual socialists and some Marxists) here in Sweden always laugh when yanks call Bernie Sanders a socialist or communist.

Fofana is DONE. SELL HIM!! and this lad below worries me (we are scouting him): Castello Lukeba to Miss Two to Three Months Due to Hamstring Injury Reece 2.0?

Lol. That is quite likely the most farcical claim I have seen made on this board (ALL forums btw). You couldn't train a hamster to run in a wheel.

Broken your linguistic processors are, padawan.

Random incoherent claptrap in pseudo-English. You need to reprogramme your language model database.

Bullshit. You are now engaging in raw and open disinformation and falsehood spreading. Bad faith poster.

Lol if you think Newsweek is a lefty magazine/site. Ludicrous.

You are outdoing yourself with this meaningless gibberish. You are a btec troll that spews a 4Chan level turgid mismash of RW distillated bollocks, and you do so in such poorly executed English syntax that it makes Cosmic look positively Shakespearean in comparison. You offer nothing (and never have) worthy of anyone on this board paying the slighest heed to, unless they desire to lower their IQ a few points simply by attempting to read your randomly nonsensical output. You are quite likely the least intelligent persona to ever darken the TC door.

Billionaire contributions in total dollars given to Republicans dwarf billionaire contributions in total dollars given to Democrats, as I just showed. so.... AI fail.

Republican billionaire money contributions dwarf Democratic billionaire contributions. This article is from October, before Musk and some of the biggest others dumped even more dollars in a last minute money frenzy: Why Most Billionaires Still Favor Donald Trump and the Republicans https://www.newsweek.com/why-most-billionaires-still-favor-donald-trump-republicans-opinion-1967643 Since the Supreme Court's 2010 Citizens United decision, American politics have been flooded by a tsunami of spending by a dizzying array of organizations. One of the lasting impacts of that decision has been to dramatically empower the country's roughly 813 billionaires by allowing them to spend more or less unlimited amounts of cash on our elections. Democrats certainly boast their share of billionaire donors and supporters, like former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, if for no other reason than that you don't want to bring a matchbox car to a NASCAR race. But Republicans remain the party of not only the billionaire class but of the wealthy more broadly, as measured both in campaign contributions and voter preferences. Which party benefits more from this endless stream of billionaire scratch is an incredibly easy question to answer. Open Secrets maintains a list of the top 100 individual contributors to both parties and their various outside groups during this election cycle. Republicans have been the beneficiaries of this spending by a margin of $879 million to $327 million for Democrats. Yes, you read that right – America's wealthiest citizens have already spent well over a billion dollars on this election. Open Secrets characterizes 59 of them as solidly or leaning Republican/Conservative and just 39 as solidly or leaning Democratic/Liberal, with two "on the fence." It's not just campaign contributions. While exit pollsters don't specifically survey billionaires, they do ask about how people who make less than or more than $100,000 a year voted. Trump won that wealthier group in 2020, which of course includes billionaires, 54 percent to 42 percent. This has been true in every modern election with the exception of 2016, when Hillary Clinton and Trump himself tied with this group. This is pretty stark data. So, to think that Democrats are the party of billionaires, you have to first take the biggest bong rip in human history and then, your head flooded with THC fog, proceed to ignore the fact that Republicans reliably serve the billionaire class's interests and enjoy a decisive advantage in terms of getting them to spend their largesse influencing the outcome of our elections. Remember that the richest man in the world, Elon Musk, is currently propping up the entire Republican effort to hold the U.S. House of Representatives. Musk isn't just writing checks—he's turned Twitter, the social media website he paid $44 billion for, into a right-wing influence operation by letting any knucklehead buy a blue check and propel themselves to the top of the algorithm. Twitter, rebranded X (perhaps to stand for the generation that Musk so odiously embodies), is now an impenetrable cesspool of Nazis, influence-peddlers, grifters, disinformation artists and cranks that marches once-fringe far-right ideas proudly into the mainstream. It makes sense that Republicans enjoy the backing of most billionaires because the Trump campaign as always is promising to do their bidding in a very straightforward fashion. Trump hasn't exactly been generous with sharing his policy proposals (since they largely do not exist), but one thing we do know is that he is planning to drop the corporate tax rate again to 15 percent after cutting it dramatically to 21 percent with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. He has no plans whatsoever to raise any further revenue from rich people, full stop. snip