CeleryFC

My eyeeeeeees!!!!!!!! That looks bloody awful.

Haha, I can see that . His lack of chin, and squishy nose just always had smacks of Benjamin Button to me.

You are probably right. He just always seems to be spitting his dummy out of the pram. Then again, maybe I've only come to that analogy because he looks like an adult baby.

Dunno. It's all a moot point really though. Playing three games doesn't mean he hasn't refused to play more. I don't really know what to make of the situation. LvG could be right on the money, or he could be losing his marbles. I wouldn't be surprised with either. Although I really wish he would shut up about "philosophy".

Van Gaal said he refused to play with the U21s, and that is why they're selling him, and those were the U21 games that he played in.

Didn't UEFA brand them the worst fans in Europe too? Stealing tickets out of children's hands. Scum.

That's what I'm saying. Cursed! Haha. Then again, Crespo wasn't all bad, but you could argue he did his best work wearing the number 21...

I hope he Hasselbainks it, and doesn't Torres it. Number 9? Bloody hell.

I'd call it a popper too. Or a snap fastener. But never a button.

I dunno, it still seems too high to me. Like I feel like its weird I can see their nipples below the line.

The polo shirts with hidden buttons have me worried too...

chest seam is a bit too high for my liking. other than that wish it was our actual kit, because its looking like the leaked one is real and i think it looks awful

Its pretty simple, if you have a child and they are straight they won't get gay married anyway, and if you have a child and they are gay, it doesnt matter what school they do or don't go to, they'll still be gay, and you probably shouldn't be a parent if you can't love that kid all the same. Learning about tolerance doesn't mean all the straight kids on the block are gunna start questioning their sexuality.

So now the constitution doesn't matter? And yeah, true I guess, but it doesnt take a genius to differentiate an agenda based on hate.

Honey, that site very clearly has an agenda (just look at all the words it has highlighted in red... not subtle). Its not that that court case might not be true, but that its not representative. The point is all the gay families that don't abuse their children don't go to court at all, no case, no drama. Four people just don't equate. Bad parents are bad parents, whether they're gay or straight. (I hate accidentally rhyming.) What is this staggering amount of evidence too? There will always be problems with obtaining a probability sample, so it'll never be accurate or representative in the first place. Data is also often skewed because male-male molestation doesn't mean a paedophiles adult sexual orientation is homosexual, as often they don't have one, and these are the type of perceived homosexuals that won't get married in the first place. This was quite interesting http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html particularly - The reason I don't understand those concerns is because gay people are not any different to the rest of us, and you'd have to think they were to be worried about that shit. And marriage is still seen as two people that romantically love each other, not just love. I know you think it might, but honestly people aren't going to try and marry their sister for marriage benefits just because the gays can. I'm sorry, but I feel like that argument is a cop out. All these people that are now going to start exploiting marriage? Forget all the those green card marriages that already happen. Straight marriage is the only way marriage can be recognized because everyone and their fence/shed/car/dog are gunna get married now a man and a man, and a woman and a woman can declare their love for each other. Its just a ridiculous notion. As said already, it was ruled to be constitutional, a federal matter not a state one.

I don't know any statistics, but I do know two people with gay parents and they are both amazing individuals, and they both cite their parents as important factors in who they are. The process of adoption, and even surrogacy is often very long and difficult, and gay couples that really want children go through a lot to get them. This would make for incredibly loving parents in most cases. There is NO correlation between child abuse (either sexual or physical) and having gay parents though, and plenty of straight parents abuse their children as it is. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/10/lesbians-child-abuse-0-percent_n_781624.htmlthis article while only focussing on lesbian parents is positive though I'm reluctant to have an opinion against relationships involving consenting adults, (their business is their business) but incestuous and even distant relatives being a couple is really rare where I'm from. Marrying blood relatives isn't allowed here, apart from your first cousin I think, which they only allowed fairly recently. I think the issue with blood relatives is the chances of birth defects if you have children? Entirely not the same vein as not allowing gay people to marry.

Children can't consent. That's why there is an age of consent, because they're vulnerable and don't fully understand. Adam Johnson was alleged to have groomed her though (something I imagine they must have had some kind of evidence of first), I don't know if anything has come out of it though, or if the case is still going on. Thats the thing with paedophiles though, they can manipulate children into thinking they want it too. And I won't accept "she/he came on to me first!", children can't consent. And no, animals can't consent either. I don't think it'll ever be accepted that two siblings can get married just to get marriage benefits. For a start thats not why homosexuals get married either (it might sometimes be a factor, but its not the reason). The difference in romantic love (which both gay and straight couples share) and platonic or familial is pretty bloody obvious too.

ALSO: Linking homosexuality with incest, pedophilia and bestiality is bad form. There are HUGE differences. Consent being the big one. Homosexuality is exhibited throughout the animal kingdom (read: nature) as well, so there's an argument there for whether it be 'unnatural' or not. EDIT: I know you aren't saying they are, but I mean that, that is the argument that would stop the next steps, if you get my drift.

But the overall divorce rate could still fall. 40-50% of marriages in the US end in divorce, not only very religious people get married. I'm only speculating though.

A February–March 2015 Wall Street Journal poll found that 59% of Americans favor same-sex marriage. A January–February 2015 Human Rights Campaign poll found that 60% of Americans favor same-sex marriage, while 37% oppose. The same poll also found that 46% of respondents say they know a same-sex couple who have gotten married. A February 12–15, 2015 CNN/ORC poll found that 63% of Americans believe same-sex marriage is a constitutional right, while 36% oppose. Admittedly polls are not always accurate, but it is a fact that public opinion is going that way, why put off the inevitable? (I've also lifted that from wikipedia so shoot me) And I still disagree that it is an attack on democracy. Giving people rights is not the same as taking them away. And religion is more malleable than people give it credit for. People wear clothes made of different fabrics, stonings aren't commonplace, and you're not expected to kill people if they believe something different anymore (Deuteronomy and Leviticus really go a bit OTT). As for 'severe repercussions' ... I'm not sure if you mean repercussions of gay marriage, or repercussions of the supreme court making law. The supreme court has passed lots of rulings, but is it just this time you have a problem with it or just their role altogether? It'll be interesting to see if the divorce rate starts going down, they've fought for the right to be married, and probably respect the sanctity far more than a lot of their straight counterparts.

A pretty overwhelming majority of Americans support gay marriage though, and they're not really encroaching on anyone's freedoms. Straight people are still free to not get gay married.

She certainly has me sliding down the Kinsey scale.

NB screams substitute gym teacher.

Supporter, Choulo, Supporter, but you're all worldies really

Should he cool it or should he blow? I think he's good cover, but its probably better for him to leave. Other than injury I can't see Azpi losing that spot.