cosmicway

Bournemouth. Bou.

I 'm happier now because this team can score goals. Under Potter - Lamps - first half of season with Poch, only through the ... eyedropper. W.r. to league position it's been several years we are not seeing something really good. This time we finished below the CL positions by some margin but it's not as if I remember something a lot better, since Antonio.

The Brtn man was instantly up on his fcuking feet. Lampley did worse.

I explained I could not get full screen. So ffff off. It looked to me he was trying to get himself up and scratched the other man.

I watched from small screen. You think he is to blame ?

Fc*king var destoyed the match. What did James do ? They tumbled him down -free kick to Chelsea it was- then he was pulling his legs and touched someone.

Chels is in. Pray for Athletic Bilbao.

United doing us a favour.

Ok. It's not a crime if you don't know legalese. I learned some because I like the films with Romans, James Mason, Charles Laughton. Also as it happens I have to go into legalese.

War is unrelated. Here what I 'm looking for is a lexicographic explanation of "preventive defense", in common law. I described it as a neonazi-hooligan phrase tantamount to the "assault battalion" - for which the Golden Dawn has already been convicted ! Something else ? I might accept that the person -a registered Golden Dawn member in fact- who said that did not really mean to incite people to break the peace. I have no reason to do so and it does n't seem that way at all, but for the sake of it I might accept it. So he used the wrong words in his public address for which I challenged him. But am I responsible for him using the wrong words ? What kind of reasonable thing can "preventive defense" mean ? In the tense atmosphere pertaining at the time as well (daily riots a.s.o.). I do accept alternative explanations - in fact I 'm searching for any so I wrote here. My lawyer bottled it I 'm told, also the judges were hostile. This lawyer did n't want me to appear in court -staged a mini revolution about it- but I can talk better than he does or at least as good as he does. The man is a family friend -so another mini revolution at home against my wish to change him. A relative who was present also thinks so now but she says the bad acoustics of the chamber did not allow her to hear everything.

0 days, 0 hours, -43minutes. The referee is about to blow the half time whistle 😄😄😄

Exactly my boy. A hostile action by a specified person or persons preceded your defensive action in your "example". It's the "preventive" bit and the composite phrase we are talking about. So what is "preventive defense" ? (*) I believe the translation from my language to English does not alter the meaning of words in this case and "preventive" means that no other party initiated the violent conflict, only you. Preventive presence is quite another thing ((e.g. police in a football stadium to deter hooligans - security at airport gates). (*) it was "let's kill them because they are black" really, but we are into legalese now In international law it's different. The term exists and preventive defense is justifiable. There is a difficulty because war has no laws really and because UN is a talking shop, but nevertheless in the area of international law it is acceptable. But we are talking about common law.

It is lexicographic issue. Attack is attack. Defense necessitates we 've been attacked - it is legal use of violence. Preventive defense ? (anyway, in reality those characters just slaughtered a few innocent people - that's what they have been doing)

Nazism is a natural enemy. The big corporation may or may not be an enemy, depending on one's position with repect to it. But the "antifascists" ? Antifascists please explain. Anyway about this trial of mine perhaps the forum can explain some things. The trial itself, excluding the probable external interventions, was about this term used by the golden dawnies: preventive defense To me it means "assault battalion" in relation to Golden Dawn activities and to everyone else among common people. But to the judge the term was innocent ! Can we dewlve upon it ? To me "preventive defense" is a strange phrase and never used by the (legal) security forces. In international law it has a meaning: Somebody sends troops at our border, he does n’t initiate an attack but we strike first. The UN -maybe- justifies our action, so in that sense the term has a legality. But among private citizens ? Prevention implies there has been no action from some individual or collection of individuals but we believe there is a danger and we take certain measures. Defense means action - use of violence. The two words put together means “attack”, does n’t it ? So it’s something illegal. Also if we believe someone is dangerous we have a right to report to the police authority. Then the police authority has to oblige the other person to keep the peace. If we neglect this step but take action ourselves it probably means two things: a) we break the law b) we don’t know where the danger comes from so we attack random persons - again breaking the law I ’m not a legal expert and this is my view of “preventive defense”. Any other ideas ?

Bound not ... prison. Also a fine but I don't know yet how much it is. However all the lefties I know here are expressing their joy - so much for antifascism. The prime minister is calling them what I called them, the former prime minister, the chief public prosecutor mr. Dogiakos - but for the kangaroo court those street mobs were ... boy scouts accompanying old ladies to the bank and to the shopping. It figures however. The character who accused me was in relation with the giant bookmaker company so the rest follows. Plus I had a useless lawyer. He prevented me frorm appearing in person - he even threatened with walk out. I don't know what to make of this but he was clearly less able to talk in the chamber compared to me.

To finish above Newcastle requires point difference. This can be achieved with a variety of results. We have Brighton away, Bournemouth home. They have United away, Brentford away. I can't tell. Rememeber the crazy ending of the 2020-21 season and how we finished fourth above Leicester ?

I lost the fc*king trial to the neonazis. Believe it or not. Let me explain what happened. It was one of the loudmouths of the golden dawn party who somehow was allowed to become the broadcaster for the national horse racing company in 2011. There were lots of complaints -the race course telephone centre was jammed- and they fired him the next day (because of his intense activism on behalf of the neonazis). The minister of sports Ioannidis is said to have been involved and asked the race course to do away with the character. We understood it was an oversight. The race course directors in 2011 were from the socialist party and it must have been an oversight. Years pass. The race course becomes a private company in 2016. This new company (OPAP.gr) was making many mistakes. Turnovers were plummetting down - nothing worked. From my blog I was trying everyday to point out their mistakes -in an effort to save the Greek races. In vain. In the end they closed down the race course. A 100 year history was erased in one day, this January the 31st. I really wanted to save the races. I have writen an artificial intelligence program (CosmiC Racing). It was very hard work - there is nothing else like it - now it has been rendered useless. In between then what happened ? The Golden dawn character reappeared in March 2018 as a broadacaster for OPAP ! I challenged this - I considered it gross defamation for the Greek races, as something likely to bring disaster for our races even closer. I published in my site a video from 2012 in which he was calling for what appeared to be assault battalions against immigrants. Those were the same assault battalions who muredered people and eventually the Golden Dawn party was declared an "illegal criminal organisation" and its leaders are now in jail. But not in my case ! They took me to court for calling them "assault battalions". They were not that - they were boy scouts helping old ladies to cross the road was the indictment against me ! This kind of rubbish was then somehow accepted by the court early this morning, In April 2018 they managed to virtually drag me out of hospital where I was about to undergo a serious operation. They wanted to take me to "instant court" but could n't do it because of the hospital. It went through the slow channels of regular justice and this morning we got the result. A 5 month sentence against me ! I have no idea what the discussion went like. My lawyer did not want me to be present (strange but he insisted). I have no idea what the verdict was based on. The man in the video was clearly calling for street violence against immigrants. But I was alone. As everybody knows -from here to the next galaxy- I have no relation or connection with the political left and the "anarchist circles". If that was n't the case then some 50-100 people would be present in the chamber shouting and making noise. I was and I am alone. Of course the company with the big money is behind this as you can readily understand. Not the Golden Dawn clowns as such.

Newcastle were very poor yesterday. Against Burnley they managed to score early and looked better but yestraday was an anticlimax.

It's the last twenty years or so and it's getting worse and worse. Must be some kind of extraterrestrial control experiment, there is no other explanation. Granted it's not easy to write a "grand succès" song - 't is a rare inspiration le grand succès. But from some ten years ago I recall Greece entered the contest with one of those horriblies again. Yet from the same year's Greek top ten why not this decent number ?

My entry for 2025:

Eurovision once upon a time: ... even Greece from a lower mark

I 'm going to subscribe to the communist party tomorrow.

All of these songs are rubbish.

eurofraud is over. the bookies smacked the victims. UK nil point

They won't. So what does 6th place give us ?