cosmicway

The effects of the match against City were evident. Chelsea were not the same team plus the two crucial absences. This is no justification because we always have 38 premier matches, two cups, Europe - nobody is supposed to have ... one month breaks between derbies. From the first minute defense looked brittle, ready to break. Even Petrovitch gifted them the first. As for goals ... we know this lot can't shoot past their moms.

Their tv station was the national joke because of the tear jerking. Still, they managed to organize themselves. We did the exact opposite. Abramovitch was not well in his last years imo (perhaps anticipating the troubles). The yanks are forget life. We have fallen victim to every crooked player manager - Nigerian scammer on earth and splashed hundreds of millions.

That Jackson is a pain in the *ss. Where is Giroud ? Where is even Abraham ? Liked this man - high centre of gravity was his problem but otherwise more talented and effective compared to all this crap (Stirling - Jackson),

The backline were always giving the ball away. When Arsenal deserved 1 attack we were giving them 3. Upfront utter chaos. Talking about moving the ball against organized defense: Chelsea players: Scratch head not knowing what to do, stop-go. Sometimes a semblence of a move was completed. Arsenal players: Accurate passing and positioning, had our 5-6 men run like headless chicken to cover. Abysmal. Poch has really got to go and of course we 've seen this thing many times this year.

Ok. Kai is good when things are easy.

Two years ago Arsenal was not on the map. Management versus c*ntery.

The post mortem will tell us. Meanwhile I 'm going to have a small bet. They offer 6.00 - should have been 2.90. The relative probabilities are in my favour.

No, I don't ignore. I read about Palmer today. But I don't see how we were -relatively- good against the other two and not Arsenal now.

Are they ? We did n't lose to pool, City. Why to them ? But Palmer is out.

One yardstick for AI could be the Putnam exam (US maths Olympiad). I don't have any pure calculus books here - left them in Egnland - but I can barely solve one problem, usually none. If AI can do the Putnam paper then it wins over human intelligence. The rest is trivial - just attach some limbs to it so it can walk, use screwdrivers etc.

What he means is the rate at which civilization is progressing. Suppose year 1924 to year 2024 counts as one unit. Then 1824 to 1924 how many units ? Let's say one unit again. But as we go back the units per one hundred years definitely get smaller. So the Romans of 300 AD were really better than the Macedonians of 200 BC ? I doubt it. The earliest finds of human activity are 3 million years old and it looks as if there is some exponential growth.

Look suppose I give you a horse race card. You need to spend one-two hours to work out the form. But AI can do it at the push of a button. Of course if you go to the races and hang around there is hanky panky business going on you can sniff and it's better than form analysis. But form analysis is a necessary prerequisite and if AI does it for you, you must be pretty archaic not to use.

You can't say that AI is per se hostile. But it may be superior. If you are against AI you are also against modern football systems and you want WM to come back.

The jobs that vanish is an old story. The neighbourhood typist is one. Last time I visited one was in 1982, a little before the home line printer. My father gave me some documents he wanted typed. Funny thing that happened that day was this: The typist had a stack of papers on the next table. While she was typing I said "you need those ? I want them as scrap paper". She says "ok - take them". Then I read the back side and it was a list of shops of the neighbourhood as compiled in the local PASOK party headquarters. In it the various shopkeepers were described as "reactionaries", "exponents of the right" and such names. The PASOK party was fresh in government, in its pre-USA days.

Why ? When you go to the bank and it's 5 past 3 and the doors automatically close do you break them ? The robots will not turn hostile (maybe at some final stage they will). Also they will have people as frontmen.

WILL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REPLACE MAN ? I am convinced now that both Tories - Labour - Liberals - others are on their way out. The future is artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence is wirh us for one century or more now, but in the form of master-slave configuration, Now it's time for artificial intelligence to do it's coming out. I believe that a few years from now artificial intelligence robots will rule. They will be saying to Sunak - Starmer and other such characters "pssst boy, go and get us the orange drinks". Eventually they will replace us of course. Their political system ? It's a question mark - they will decide. Why do you think you are different from artificial intelligence ? I remember in my first grade in primary school the teacher asked as to make an artificial satellite model using plasticine and toothpicks. Somehow I did n't get the idea properly. I made a rectangular shape and the toothpicks formed a grid inside the rectangular shape. But the idea was to make the plasticine into a ball and then just stick the toothpicks on it to look like antennas. The artificial satellites were all the rage at the time because the Soviets had launched the Sputnik with Laika into space. Now by the same token we may try to program a robot to go to the newsagent to buy the newspapers. The robot will stumble on the steps trying to exit the house and fall flat on its face. Terrible ! But on the second-third-fourth trial he is going to make it, bring the newspapers. So you see it's trial and error. The so called "preceived images" (I don't know how you might call it). It's the same as me giving you an exercise in trigonometry. What will happen ? One possibility is you saw this exact same thing before - you write down the answer. Another is you know zilch about trigonometry, you return a blank sheet of paper. But yet another is the "perceived images" will guide you towards the solution. Artificial intelligence already can do that - use "perceived images". So there can be no question about it. AI rules. Labour - Conservatives - all the rest are on their way out. But AI is destined to rule the configuration space as well.

We could come to an arrangement with them and sell the game - this will also serve the purpose of making Pep and Klop very cross. Again we could not, If we approach the match with the same spirit as against City why not a win ? Is Palmer ok ?

We could sell it, to make Pep angry.

Casemiro and the two Coventry misses were ridiculous.

The c*nts reached the final.

Salah was dismissed by Mou. Quadrado also who went on to make a great career for La Juve. Salah made only a few apperances for Chelsea. Last time I remember him was the 6-0 against Arsenal when he came in as a replacement after the 5-0 and scored the last goal. However I don't recall another Salah case in football (from transfer list to glory), though Palmer too looks like being one.

This team needs a real striker above all else. I 'm fed up with Pato type solutions.

All he needed was a lob over Ortega's head. Ortega was 12 yards away from his goalposts. I 'd forgive Jackson if he lobbed the ball and somehow miss, but not what he did. Lost his mind and stopped dead on his tracks knowing not what to do. The second one is Chil if I 'm not mistaken. Attempted the pass but was intercepted.

Class of Aube - Pato - Remy, little things.

Killed by fatigue ... They played better than they did at Etihad in the 1-1 draw. These matches hang on a razor's edge and we also had to cope with Oliver and his var friend. I remember a myriad pens like that. Just tell me if the rule has changed. Does the defending player have to confess to Scotland yard detectives now to the effect it was deliberate ? If such a change has come about, I 'm going to apologize to Oliver.