Jump to content

Articles

Read the latest Chelsea news and opinion from our main website.


8,434 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 316 views
    • 0 replies
    • 5.4k views
    • 0 replies
    • 327 views
    • 0 replies
    • 335 views
    • 0 replies
    • 348 views
    • 0 replies
    • 327 views
    • 0 replies
    • 350 views
    • 0 replies
    • 300 views
    • 0 replies
    • 342 views
    • 0 replies
    • 317 views
    • 0 replies
    • 649 views
    • 0 replies
    • 297 views
    • 0 replies
    • 427 views
    • 0 replies
    • 347 views
    • 0 replies
    • 339 views
    • 0 replies
    • 313 views
    • 0 replies
    • 293 views
    • 0 replies
    • 271 views
    • 0 replies
    • 274 views
    • 0 replies
    • 274 views
  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Latest Posts

    • slabhead waddling about
    • nil 1 lol
    • Looks like Lavia is not registered for Conference League. But Mudryk is there 🤔
    • 1893-94 131 years ago was the last time Manure was this bad at home
    • https://www.vipleague.pm/fa-cup/manchester-united-vs-leicester-city-1-live-streaming https://www.vipleague.pm/fa-cup/manchester-united-vs-leicester-city-2-live-streaming   https://redditsoccerstreams.org/event/manchester-united-leicester-city/1504613   https://favs.soccerstreams100.io/event/eng-fa/leicester-vs-man-united-live-soccer-stats/730040  
    • Their logic is there's Nkunku, a player they valued at 50-60m. 3 forwards in the squad - Jackson Nkunku Guiu
    • The exact scenario I repeatedly raised during the entire January window. What would happen if Jackson got injured. This injury doesn’t seem serious but it just exposes yet again that’s it’s crazy we didn’t sign anyone. With Guiu now out now too it makes the club look even dumber.
    • Chelsea’s transfer window reviewed: Squad players leave but judgement will have to wait https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6112492/2025/02/06/Chelsea-transfer-window-review/ Barely a day went by during the transfer window without Chelsea’s name being mentioned. The Todd Boehly-Clearlake consortium took a contrasting approach to their first two mid-season markets. There was the lavish spend of January 2023, which saw six players recruited — including the high-profile acquisitio
    • Who is the CB you'd sign?
    • If they want peanuts for wages too. There's no chance this board would outlay wages of £150kpw plus for any free agent. I'd say you're partially right. We definitely don't need more deadwood, but no matter how good a 18-22-year-old might look, he will lack key attributes that can only be gained from experience/winning. Players similar to Silva, albeit 3-4 years old, would be the sweet spot to balance things out (Tah springs to mind). At this point though, it's a matter of us banging our h
    • The criticisms aren't blind rage, they're supported by facts, and winning won't change them! Fans aren't stupid, and we see the evidence right in front of us https://siphillipstalkschelsea.substack.com/p/the-criticisms-arent-blind-rage-theyre January 2025 was a hell of a month for Chelsea fans. Inconsistent results, and increasing frustration at an ownership and sporting directors who appeared on the surface to be completely unaware of these needs or at least unwilling to do
  • Player Threads

×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You