The Pub - Discuss Anything

[Barbara 15,149]

I am no sweetie. Don't degrade me like that, i find it offensive. If i was a girl and yo a man, there would be a sexual harrassment charge.

I call men sweetie here all the time and you're the first to think it's degrading...

But let's stop it. I don't want to be banned

peace offer?

*hugs*

[Stingray 9,441]

I call men sweetie here all the time and you're the first to think it's degrading...

But let's stop it. I don't want to be banned

peace offer?

*hugs*

Not here. That would be window dressing.

[DJames 729]

Here comes the random post:

The squirty thingy on my car isn't working

[Barbara 15,149]

What happenned?

Everyone was having a good old incest discussion and we are now on religion vs science.

actually Tom unfairly thought it had anything to do with religion. It was still about incest not being perceived as natural avoidance in all cultures in the world, as Nour suggested and I agreed. It has nothing with the religious views at all. I did mention Muslim (not Christianity) and it somehow made me the ignorant Christian. But to fill my label fine, and show I've learned well what I teach I'm forgiving and I love the enemies - even if only arguments enemies.. so I'm cool, Tom on the other hand seems offended by being calling sweetie. But I already fixed that (editing my original post and removing the offensive word)

So I guess everyone is cool now?

Also everyone ignored I'm sharing a bed with my brother for the next two weeks... that should have been the most outrageous thing I wrote here

[Duppy Conqueror 1,494]

From the slaughtered lamb pub to a student bar in one evening.that's quite a rapid make over..

[Stingray 9,441]

Bullshit. I never made this a religion debate. So 'Tom' didnt think 'unfairly' it had to do with religion. I call your bluff: show me where i said that?

Also: you didnt fix anything. You just want to let the 'public opinion' on here think that. Close, but no cigar, miss.

[Tiwaz 539]

[DJames 729]

Here comes the random post:

The squirty thingy on my car isn't working

Damn! My washer bottle has a leak. I despise it when unplanned stuff requiring money (I had plans *shoes* *clothes* ) creep up

[Ankit 3,176]

Wow, just wasted my 15 minutes reading the last 3-4 pages. :banghead:

Damn! My washer bottle has a leak. I despise it when unplanned stuff requiring money (I had plans *shoes* *clothes* ) creep up

Well, it shouldn't be too expensive! Although i agree, it is annoying.

[Barbara 15,149]

Damn! My washer bottle has a leak. I despise it when unplanned stuff requiring money (I had plans *shoes* *clothes* ) creep up

I feel your pain, sister!

I hate those too and I'm going to spend a lot in my car's suspension because god forbid this city to have more holes on the streets than it has. And I don't know if it's called suspension in English, but it's a very similar word in portuguese so I hope my post comes across

[DJames 729]

Well, it shouldn't be too expensive! Although i agree, it is annoying.

To buy it brand new it would be. Cars are outrageously expensive here with car parts not too far behind.

[Sidzeret 2,257]

Lol, what the biggest load of absolute bollocks i have ever read:

People have been into space. How have they not discovered that the earth is flat?

The most commonly accepted explanation of this is that the space agencies of the world are involved in a conspiracy faking space travel and exploration. This likely began during the Cold War's 'Space Race', in which the U.S.S.R and USA were obsessed with beating each other into space to the point that each faked their accomplishments in an attempt to keep pace with the others supposed achievements. However, since the end of the Cold War, the conspiracy is most likely motivated by greed rather than political gains. Thus opening up a tremendous amounts of funds to embezzle as it only takes a fraction of the total budget to fake space travel.

In light of the above, please note that we are not suggesting that space agencies are aware that the earth is flat and actively covering the fact up. They depict the earth as being round simply because that is what they expect it to be.

There are many pictures on the internet and in other media depicting the earth as being round. Why do these not disprove flat earth theory?

In general, we at the Flat Earth Society do not lend much credibility to photographic evidence. It is too easily manipulated and altered. Many of the videos posted here to "prove a round earth" by showing curvature will show no curvature or even convex curvature at parts. The sources are so inaccurate it's difficult to build an argument on them in either case. Furthermore, barrel distortion and other quirks of modern cameras will cause a picture to distort with little or no apparent altercation; especially without references within the picture. Photographs are also prone to distortion when taken through the bent glass of a pressurized cabin as well as atmospheric conditions on the outside. With this litany of problems, it's easy to see why photographic evidence is not to be trusted.

Like seriously, what a bunch of complete and utter bullshitters.

Try telling that to Galileo @Stingray here:-P

[Sidzeret 2,257]

actually Tom unfairly thought it had anything to do with religion. It was still about incest not being perceived as natural avoidance in all cultures in the world, as Nour suggested and I agreed. It has nothing with the religious views at all. I did mention Muslim (not Christianity) and it somehow made me the ignorant Christian. But to fill my label fine, and show I've learned well what I teach I'm forgiving and I love the enemies - even if only arguments enemies.. so I'm cool, Tom on the other hand seems offended by being calling sweetie. But I already fixed that (editing my original post and removing the offensive word)

So I guess everyone is cool now?

Also everyone ignored I'm sharing a bed with my brother for the next two weeks... that should have been the most outrageous thing I wrote here

Ok Cercei , I got u covered

[DJames 729]

I feel your pain, sister!

I hate those too and I'm going to spend a lot in my car's suspension because god forbid this city to have more holes on the streets than it has. And I don't know if it's called suspension in English, but it's a very similar word in portuguese so I hope my post comes across

I hear you with those holes, truly horrid things. I change my shocks (part of the suspension system) last month. My wallet cried a bit.

[LayZ 201]

Lol, what the biggest load of absolute bollocks i have ever read:

People have been into space. How have they not discovered that the earth is flat?

The most commonly accepted explanation of this is that the space agencies of the world are involved in a conspiracy faking space travel and exploration. This likely began during the Cold War's 'Space Race', in which the U.S.S.R and USA were obsessed with beating each other into space to the point that each faked their accomplishments in an attempt to keep pace with the others supposed achievements. However, since the end of the Cold War, the conspiracy is most likely motivated by greed rather than political gains. Thus opening up a tremendous amounts of funds to embezzle as it only takes a fraction of the total budget to fake space travel.

In light of the above, please note that we are not suggesting that space agencies are aware that the earth is flat and actively covering the fact up. They depict the earth as being round simply because that is what they expect it to be.

There are many pictures on the internet and in other media depicting the earth as being round. Why do these not disprove flat earth theory?

In general, we at the Flat Earth Society do not lend much credibility to photographic evidence. It is too easily manipulated and altered. Many of the videos posted here to "prove a round earth" by showing curvature will show no curvature or even convex curvature at parts. The sources are so inaccurate it's difficult to build an argument on them in either case. Furthermore, barrel distortion and other quirks of modern cameras will cause a picture to distort with little or no apparent altercation; especially without references within the picture. Photographs are also prone to distortion when taken through the bent glass of a pressurized cabin as well as atmospheric conditions on the outside. With this litany of problems, it's easy to see why photographic evidence is not to be trusted.

Like seriously, what a bunch of complete and utter bullshitters.

Is this from a Terry Pratchett interview?

[Hutcho 8,443]

Is this from a Terry Pratchett interview?

From that website posted.

[Stingray 9,441]

Ok Cercei , I got u covered

[Sidzeret 2,257]

ImageUploadedByTapatalk HD1374001053.551574.jpg

Let me finish my pint, brother and i'll get my boy de Rossi for your stingers. He got some Teletubbies tatts up his sleeves