Jump to content

Don't you forget about Guus


 Share

Recommended Posts

We thank Hiddink for LAST SEASON and winning us the FA Cup, but THIS SEASON is all down to Carlo, he has won us the DOUBLE.

Ivanovic was already a right back when we signed him, Malouda's talent was always there he just had to find his feet.

This season's success is all down to Carlo IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 1 year later...
Guest justin_3d

And then we can say Raniere made the job easier for Mourinho, and Mourinho made it easier for Avram.

It will never end.

Guus is my favorite coach in the world. Numero 1, follow by Marcelo Bielsa, but you are going a bit way out of line there.

Cause if you give that much credit to Guus, then we might as well give a lot more to Raniere for setting the backbone of Chelsea before Mourinho took over!

We should all say thanks to England for creating this lovely game Americans call SOCCER :eyebrows:

And you must be a fool to think only Americans call it Soccer.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And then we can say Raniere made the job easier for Mourinho, and Mourinho made it easier for Avram.

It will never end.

Guus is my favorite coach in the world. Numero 1, follow by Marcelo Bielsa, but you are going a bit way out of line there.

Cause if you give that much credit to Guus, then we might as well give a lot more to Raniere for setting the backbone of Chelsea before Mourinho took over!

And you must be a fool to think only Americans call it Soccer.....

No. Sometimes it ends. Carlo's legacy is zero. The new manager will start from point zero. Carlo did not anything new that the new manager might use.

One year ago I already had my doubts about Carlo abilities. Right after the double I was saying he wasnt this genious as some would like to believe. Thats why I dont accept the term "plastic fan". I think its more apropriated to describe people who consider a manager a legend after one single season. His trophies in his first season werent enough to made up my mind, and his poor form in this season showed that Hiddink legacy wasnt as small as people said.

A great coach is supposed to turn things in difficult moments. Carlo doesnt have such skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

No. Sometimes it ends. Carlo's legacy is zero. The new manager will start from point zero. Carlo did not anything new that the new manager might use.

One year ago I already had my doubts about Carlo abilities. Right after the double I was saying he wasnt this genious as some would like to believe. Thats why I dont accept the term "plastic fan". I think its more apropriated to describe people who consider a manager a legend after one single season. His trophies in his first season werent enough to made up my mind, and his poor form in this season showed that Hiddink legacy wasnt as small as people said.

A great coach is supposed to turn things in difficult moments. Carlo doesnt have such skill.

I understand, but what I am saying is when you take that argument, which makes sense, then we also have to take the argument of Raniere.

He set up the backbone of the team before Mourinho came to Chelsea.

So if you go by that, then we can easily say that most of the success of Mourinho was due to Raniere times, in setting up the backbone of the team.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

Aint no use in making that face. A trophy is not necessarily a legacy. Gimme only one positive thing Carlo left to next season.

Ramires and David Luiz. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest justin_3d

...it seems that all these players were indicated by Hiddink. laugh.gif

Ramires maybe, but I don't think Luiz was an Ancelotti's signing.

How do you know?

But yeah Ramires. And you only said one thing! :champions:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you know?

But yeah Ramires. And you only said one thing! :champions:

Ramires is a good player, but the fact is that he didn't played his best under Carlo.

I have to admit, Carlo has his merits in this case,despite Ramire's poor start the italian never lost the faith on in, and in last games he was improving.

But we didn't saw the best of Ramires yet, and imo most part of it is due to Carlo using him in an alien position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ramires is a good player, but the fact is that he didn't played his best under Carlo.

I have to admit, Carlo has his merits in this case,despite Ramire's poor start the italian never lost the faith on in, and in last games he was improving.

But we didn't saw the best of Ramires yet, and imo most part of it is due to Carlo using him in an alien position.

What position should Ramires play?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...