🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Nathaniel Chalobah

[LDN Blue 7,903]

It's like he doesn't exist anymore. For months he was all people spoke of.

To be fair, there's been nothing to speak of lately lol. I think we're just hoping that he won't go on loan and Mourinho will give him a chance.. Which doesn't seem likely this season.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

To be fair, there's been nothing to speak of lately lol. I think we're just hoping that he won't go on loan and Mourinho will give him a chance.. Which doesn't seem likely this season.

Are we? He didn't exactly set the world alight last season. Why should he be given a chance before someone like Atsu, for example? Honestly, I'm just hoping that one of Oriol and MVG are given a chance this season!

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Are we? He didn't exactly set the world alight last season. Why should he be given a chance before someone like Atsu, for example? Honestly, I'm just hoping that one of Oriol and MVG are given a chance this season!

His loan spell was useless, iirc it was only when he joined Boro in the second half of last season where he came back to life. We can't forget his contributions at Watford the season before, played around 38 games for them and became influential.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

His loan spell was useless, iirc it was only when he joined Boro in the second half of last season where he came back to life. We can't forget his contributions at Watford the season before, played around 38 games for them and became influential.

Well if he couldn't get into Forest's starting lineup then he's probably not ready. Even at Boro he was in and out of the side.

I'm just saying, there are a lot of our other players who impressed a lot more on loan last season.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Well if he couldn't get into Forest's starting lineup then he's probably not ready. Even at Boro he was in and out of the side.

I'm just saying, there are a lot of our other players who impressed a lot more on loan last season.

Forest was absolutely the wrong loan for him, and Billy Davies was the wrong manager. At Boro he was back to his Watford form and he needs to be given a chance this season otherwise he'll stagnate.

Romeu is probably done here. He might get a few more chances in pre-season but I've not seen anything to suggest he should be ahead of Nat.

Fact is Chalobah is a talented young English player who did enough to deserve a chance last year but the club fucked him over and set his progression back by a year.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Forest was absolutely the wrong loan for him, and Billy Davies was the wrong manager. At Boro he was back to his Watford form and he needs to be given a chance this season otherwise he'll stagnate.

Romeu is probably done here. He might get a few more chances in pre-season but I've not seen anything to suggest he should be ahead of Nat.

Fact is Chalobah is a talented young English player who did enough to deserve a chance last year but the club fucked him over and set his progression back by a year.

Ironic thing is that he's just announced that he's signed a new contract with the club probably while you were writing that!

https://www.facebook.com/OriolRomeu6?fref=nf

I think realistically, both Oriol and MVG are miles ahead of Nathanial and even they aren't guaranteed a role with the team next season!

Nathanial is still young and still not ready, imo. His best (if not only) option is another loan.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Well if he couldn't get into Forest's starting lineup then he's probably not ready. Even at Boro he was in and out of the side.

I'm just saying, there are a lot of our other players who impressed a lot more on loan last season.

But that's unfair a but Chou, regarding Forest. Their manager was clueless and he'd already earned his striped at a club that far exceeded that of Nottingham's. It's good news he's signed a new contract, it means the club have spoken to him in high regard, so maybe one more loan isn't the worst thing.

But something has to give in terms of giving him a fair opportunity.

[Madmax 9,219]

Mourinho (23/07/2013) :

"We are thinking of letting him go on loan for a last season," said Mourinho. "That is our intention. He knows. We have discussed that with him. He is a very, very good player. I like him very much - very, very much. I am very impressed. For sure, a Chelsea player (in future), for sure. We think he is there. He could be in our squad already. But we think one more season and it will be his last one out on loan."

Will he stick to his word?

[The only place to be 11,313]

Ironic thing is that he's just announced that he's signed a new contract with the club probably while you were writing that!

https://www.facebook.com/OriolRomeu6?fref=nf

I think realistically, both Oriol and MVG are miles ahead of Nathanial and even they aren't guaranteed a role with the team next season!

Nathanial is still young and still not ready, imo. His best (if not only) option is another loan.

Last year of contract so makes sense. Expect we'll still loan him and he might actually be worth something in 12 months time.

I personally still think that Chalobah is an exceptional talent and thought he should've been ahead of Mikel (remember him?) last season. I'd be entirely comfortable with him being in the rotation going into next season. His best option is probably being part of the squad.

Although I suppose we could do what Everton did with Barkley after his disappointing loan spell and loan him out again....except they didn't do that did they?

[CHOULO19 24,332]

But that's unfair a but Chou, regarding Forest. Their manager was clueless and he'd already earned his striped at a club that far exceeded that of Nottingham's. It's good news he's signed a new contract, it means the club have spoken to him in high regard, so maybe one more loan isn't the worst thing.

But something has to give in terms of giving him a fair opportunity.

Actually it's Oriol that has signed a new contract not Nathanial.

Yes, Forest was not entirely his fault (though his attitude was terrible) but even at Boro he could not replicate his Watford form. We have A LOT of young talents on loan and even more top class players in the first team. You can't have a bad season out on loan and come back expecting to be in the first team squad.

[The Skipper 20,609]

Yes, Forest was not entirely his fault (though his attitude was terrible)

Have I missed something? How was Nat's attitude at Forest terrible?

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Last year of contract so makes sense. Expect we'll still loan him and he might actually be worth something in 12 months time.

I personally still think that Chalobah is an exceptional talent and thought he should've been ahead of Mikel (remember him?) last season. I'd be entirely comfortable with him being in the rotation going into next season. His best option is probably being part of the squad.

Although I suppose we could do what Everton did with Barkley after his disappointing loan spell and loan him out again....except they didn't do that did they?

Everton are playing for Europa League which is why they can afford to give youngsters like Barkley chances, while we're challenging for the title and playing Champions League semifinals which is why we needed to keep Mikel even after we bought Matic.

Have I missed something? How was Nat's attitude at Forest terrible?

Very lazy, especially towards the end of the loan. He was just not trying anymore. He looked completely disinterested.

[The Skipper 20,609]

Very lazy, especially towards the end of the loan. He was just not trying anymore. He looked completely disinterested.

Wouldn't say that's 'terrible' attitude though, of course he'd be disillusioned with his loan spell and not bothered because he wasn't truly given the role he was promised at the start. He probably just couldn't wait to leave Forest. Not sure you can call that terrible attitude.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Actually it's Oriol that has signed a new contract not Nathanial.

Yes, Forest was not entirely his fault (though his attitude was terrible) but even at Boro he could not replicate his Watford form. We have A LOT of young talents on loan and even more top class players in the first team. You can't have a bad season out on loan and come back expecting to be in the first team squad.

Ah interesting about Romeu.

Yeah I do get what you mean regarding not having room to have 'one bad' season in this context (waiting for the inevitable Torres line from a troll). However in the bigger scheme of things, allowances have to made in the case of guys like Chalobah. We can't let him down like we did with McEachran. Nat can't go on any old loan next, it has to be carefully decided and I don't trust Chelsea to be able to do that tbh.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Wouldn't say that's 'terrible' attitude though, of course he'd be disillusioned with his loan spell and not bothered because he wasn't truly given the role he was promised at the start. He probably just couldn't wait to leave Forest. Not sure you can call that terrible attitude.

Of course it's terrible attitude. He's supposed to be a professional. Especially someone his age should show determination and professionalism regardless of the circumstances.

Ah interesting about Romeu.

Yeah I do get what you mean regarding not having room to have 'one bad' season in this context (waiting for the inevitable Torres line from a troll). However in the bigger scheme of things, allowances have to made in the case of guys like Chalobah. We can't let him down like we did with McEachran. Nat can't go on any old loan next, it has to be carefully decided and I don't trust Chelsea to be able to do that tbh.

I agree, this year will be crucial for him. We need to get him the right loan. He can't afford another year like last.

[The Skipper 20,609]

Of course it's terrible attitude. He's supposed to be a professional. Especially someone his age should show determination and professionalism regardless of the circumstances.

Come on, you're being way too harsh. How is he meant to remain determined when his loan spell was a disaster? He wasn't being unprofessional either, he hasn't said a bad word about Forest at all.

If this is a 'terrible' attitude then there are many players that are a lot older than him that have even worse attitude.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Very lazy, especially towards the end of the loan. He was just not trying anymore. He looked completely disinterested.

No offence but I'd hate for someone to read this thread and think Nathaniel Chalobah has a bad attitude and is lazy.

Just to correct you, he was simply the wrong player for that manager....a manager who has now been sacked. Nat Chalobah has always earned praise for his attitude and professionalism and conducted himself well at Forest, but on the pitch things simply didn't work out.

He's not a lazy player.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Come on, you're being way too harsh. How is he meant to remain determined when his loan spell was a disaster? He wasn't being unprofessional either, he hasn't said a bad word about Forest at all.

If this is a 'terrible' attitude then there are many players that are a lot older than him that have even worse attitude.

You can't excuse young players for obviously not giving 100% and not tracking back.

No offence but I'd hate for someone to read this thread and think Nathaniel Chalobah has a bad attitude and is lazy.

Just to correct you, he was simply the wrong player for that manager....a manager who has now been sacked. Nat Chalobah has always earned praise for his attitude and professionalism and conducted himself well at Forest, but on the pitch things simply didn't work out.

He's not a lazy player.

Usually, yes. But not at Forest. Just go read what their fans said about him. Towards the end of the loan, he didn't really try, he didn't track back. That's in excusable.

[The only place to be 11,313]

Usually, yes. But not at Forest. Just go read what their fans said about him. Towards the end of the loan, he didn't really try, he didn't track back. That's in excusable.

Reaction was mixed but the more measured responses acknowledged that he was simply the wrong player for them. They all knew exactly what he could do because they saw it at Watford, but they never really put him in a position to replicate that.

[bababoom 4,478]

Loans are so hit and miss, it annoys me that Nat played so well for Watford yet we decided to loan him back to another Championship club, last season he should have been playing in the PL... I guarantee if we had Sterling or Shaw in our youth academy they would still to this day be forced out on loan to any old Championship club.