Jump to content

Will Carlo Ancelotti's Chelsea reign mirror that of Luiz Felipe Scolari?


Term-X
 Share

Recommended Posts

I believe that if we can get the 3 points today, then we can win the league. I think comparing Aneclotti to Scolari is just plain stupid. Both men have to different styles and two different ways. I think the biggest downfall of the so called 'scolari era' was that he changed the training method half-way through the season. Carlo has more experience in club level so he should knopw the kind of do's and don'ts', and has to rely on the team for the performance he expects. To me, Carlo is more tactically aware because of his previous tenres in Italy. He has a good eye for young talent and knows a right change in the team if needed be. Another downfall was that he didn't have a back-up plan, incase his first plan failed, but Carlo has three options: 442 diamond, christmas tree, and, if need be, 433. All i can say that is i expect Carlo to do BETTER then scolari, and the statistic mentioned above supports this. I have all my faith in Carlo to get us some success, both domestic and european.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think some people (including the media) wanted us to lose today and prove a point that Ancelotti is not up to the job after what happened at Wigan. I am so glad that we proved them all wrong. Now hopefully everyone will shut up and let him get on with his job. After today we can definitely put what happened at Wigan to bed. :blue scalf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but I don't understand all this DD11 worship? Sure, he had a half-decent game and totally outshone Torres (who was feebly poor), but I can't see why his performance is being heaped with praise. Okay, in fairness, he did excellently to tease in a cross for Anelka to score and his strength in the build up for Malouda's goal was second to none, but other than that, he had quite a quiet game. His diving really did mar a decent game for him, though, in my opinion. His overall contribution wasn't bad but I though Anelka was just as lively, and he got on the scoresheet. I've also noted John Terry's and Michael Essien's performances haven't been singled out by many people, when they were truly awesome. A lot of people said Gerrard had a quiet game. Now, was that purely coincidental; that he bottled it in a big match? Or is it because Essien was biting at his heels constantly, giving him no room to manoeuvre? And Fernando Who, exactly? Because John Terry and Ricardo Carvalho (another person who had a brilliant game) kept him out of the match for its entirety, almost. I'm not slating Didier, he had a decent game - Terry, Essien, Ashley Cole, Hilario and Carvalho had better ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it matter s better it a brilliant team performance overall. They shook off the pressure of failure and discontent fromt the Wigan game, and the lack of belief from the poor performane against APOEL. Drogba was a factor in the win as much was Malouda, Ballack, Essien, Deco, Anelka, Terry, Ivanovich, Carvalho etc. Hilario was the better player for me, he wasn't put off by the pressure of the game, and pulled out all the stops to get a clean sheet, i say we have a good sub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...