Jump to content

Virgil Van Dijk


dkim2
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Jason said:

The concern is there and it's a great one but really not sure we need to beat the drums about it. Let's see how we fare in the upcoming transfer windows.

Well, given our recent transfer windows... personally I don’t have much hope. Fair play to you if you do. I do hope we change. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 753
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Liverpool beat Chelsea to Virgil Van Dijk transfer by paying over the odds, claims Antonio Conte

‘This is life. For sure he as our target but as you know this is football. We can have a lot of targets but you must be able to reach those targets. The transfer market is not simple for any club.

http://metro.co.uk/2018/01/09/liverpool-beat-chelsea-virgil-van-dijk-transfer-paying-odds-claims-antonio-conte-7217498/

So at least we know for certain that Conte does put forward to whoever is in charge of buying/selling big name,money players and not just putting up players with potential or recovering injurred.

And the same thing is happening with Sandro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Unionjack said:

Liverpool beat Chelsea to Virgil Van Dijk transfer by paying over the odds, claims Antonio Conte

‘This is life. For sure he as our target but as you know this is football. We can have a lot of targets but you must be able to reach those targets. The transfer market is not simple for any club.

http://metro.co.uk/2018/01/09/liverpool-beat-chelsea-virgil-van-dijk-transfer-paying-odds-claims-antonio-conte-7217498/

So at least we know for certain that Conte does put forward to whoever is in charge of buying/selling big name,money players and not just putting up players with potential or recovering injurred.

And the same thing is happening with Sandro.

Van dijk isn’t our mistake. He always wanted Liverpool.  Even if we made a 80m£ he would have chosen  Liverpool without a doubt (see what happened with man city)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
3 hours ago, !Hazard! said:

Shame we missed out on VvD. He's been absolutely sensational so far this season, best player in the league in the past two weeks

We went down the Napoli Koulibaly traintrack and got the Italian usual bollocksing.:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/29/2017 at 6:27 AM, The Skipper said:

Well, given our recent transfer windows... personally I don’t have much hope. Fair play to you if you do. I do hope we change. 

Revisiting this...what do you think now? :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, !Hazard! said:

Shame we missed out on VvD. He's been absolutely sensational so far this season, best player in the league in the past two weeks

Meh. It's only 2 games in for goodness sake. He may be a good defender but it's hardly catastrophic we didn't get him. As someone said above, he's always wanted Liverpool and had Conte gotten his way with Van Dijk, we might not have seen Christensen break into the starting XI!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jason said:

Meh. It's only 2 games in for goodness sake. He may be a good defender but it's hardly catastrophic we didn't get him. As someone said above, he's always wanted Liverpool and had Conte gotten his way with Van Dijk, we might not have seen Christensen break into the starting XI!

Unfortunately, Luiz looks to have taken AC's place as a starter, grrrrrrrr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jason said:

Meh. It's only 2 games in for goodness sake. He may be a good defender but it's hardly catastrophic we didn't get him. As someone said above, he's always wanted Liverpool and had Conte gotten his way with Van Dijk, we might not have seen Christensen break into the starting XI!

VDK is probably better than any defender we currently have (Andrea's potential aside). He was always a good player. The questions were around around his injuries and fitness level. Still early days, but it seems he has been able to remain fit for long periods of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VDK is probably better than any defender we currently have (Andrea's potential aside). He was always a good player. The questions were around around his injuries and fitness level. Still early days, but it seems he has been able to remain fit for long periods of time.
The fee was excessive for position we didn't necessarily need strengthening in Jan. Certainly not losing any sleep about his performances.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Skipper said:

Only happened because of Sarri. If we still had Conte, at least Eden, Courtois and Willian probably be with us anymore.  

Not having Willian might have been a good thing if this season turns out the way its heading.

Pedro has made the LW spot his own and as soon as Edens fit enough for 90 mins we wont see him on the field unless for injuries.

And hes stopping CHO getting any game time which really isn't good with CHOs contract ending next summer!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Skipper said:

Yeah but take what was said at that time in context. It was said under the premise that Conte would still be manager. 

Which is why you have to pray a lot. :P 

On 12/29/2017 at 6:29 AM, Jason said:

Well, I don't have hope. Just praying.

tenor.gif?itemid=5208801

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You