nyikolajevics 2,700 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Papy's carreer at Chelsea: 0(!!) goals conceded, 0(!!) errors lead to goal, 100% passing(omg), 100% winning rate. He might leave London but he'll be forever in our hearts. #retirenumber15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 Devastated he won't be retiring here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Colored Sky 1,807 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 4 hours ago, Pizy said: Mourinho probably has tears in his eyes from laughing at this embarrassment of a signing. This is what happens when you allow someone other than the manager to sign players. He had zero chance from the second he signed. What a joke. Mourinho's only regret is that he wasn't player from Jorge Mendes agency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Colored Sky 1,807 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 I know people laugh all they want but this transfer meant nothing. It was low cost cover and that's basically it. And no, it fucking didn't mean Chelsea's low standards in the market and how low they reached. Fucking Barca signed Douglas (lol), Vermaelen and Mathieu, it's a joke really but it means nothing. It doesn't even mean that Barca is irrevelant as some want to say the same about Chelsea citing Hector and Papy's transfers. (Why I even try. I should just write how Emenalo try to destroy club by such awful buisness and make Chelsea irrelevant) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Fox_ 2,086 Posted January 21, 2016 Share Posted January 21, 2016 1 hour ago, Blue Colored Sky said: I know people laugh all they want but this transfer meant nothing. It was low cost cover and that's basically it. And no, it fucking didn't mean Chelsea's low standards in the market and how low they reached. Fucking Barca signed Douglas (lol), Vermaelen and Mathieu, it's a joke really but it means nothing. It doesn't even mean that Barca is irrevelant as some want to say the same about Chelsea citing Hector and Papy's transfers. (Why I even try. I should just write how Emenalo try to destroy club by such awful buisness and make Chelsea irrelevant) Are you Micky transferguru Emenalo in disguise? It's the second time today you burst out to say how it has nothing to do with Emenalo, even though no one mentioned him in the posts previous to yours Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bellion 170 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 4 hours ago, Blue Colored Sky said: I know people laugh all they want but this transfer meant nothing. It was low cost cover and that's basically it. And no, it fucking didn't mean Chelsea's low standards in the market and how low they reached. Fucking Barca signed Douglas (lol), Vermaelen and Mathieu, it's a joke really but it means nothing. It doesn't even mean that Barca is irrevelant as some want to say the same about Chelsea citing Hector and Papy's transfers. (Why I even try. I should just write how Emenalo try to destroy club by such awful buisness and make Chelsea irrelevant) From a John Stones pursuit all of summer 2015 which eventually petered out to a last-day buy of Papy and you are telling us this is low cost cover. As someone asked, are you Emelano in disguise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fulham Broadway 17,317 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 59 seconds for 3 million quid -Buckenalo strikes again ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yipo 56 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 i think baba going out loan next Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Juan 28,141 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 6 hours ago, Fulham Broadway said: 59 seconds for 3 million quid -Buckenalo strikes again ! Couldn't make this shit up, honestly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sideshow Luiz 2,310 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 True Chelsea legend. Sad day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Despiadado.Maleante 1,046 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Who remembers Mineiro? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Colored Sky 1,807 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 12 hours ago, bellion said: From a John Stones pursuit all of summer 2015 which eventually petered out to a last-day buy of Papy and you are telling us this is low cost cover. As someone asked, are you Emelano in disguise? Barca chased Laporte and ended with Vermaelen, Mathieu and Douglas. Won a treble. This means nothing really, Djilobodji transfer meant nothing but people want to take from this too much conclusions. Far too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Fox_ 2,086 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 2 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said: Barca chased Laporte and ended with Vermaelen, Mathieu and Douglas. Won a treble. This means nothing really, Djilobodji transfer meant nothing but people want to take from this too much conclusions. Far too much. And what first team cbs did Barca have? What overall quality Barca has in the whole team? It isn't the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Colored Sky 1,807 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 14 hours ago, Blue_Fox_ said: Are you Micky transferguru Emenalo in disguise? It's the second time today you burst out to say how it has nothing to do with Emenalo, even though no one mentioned him in the posts previous to yours So how you want to response to my relevant part of post ? Or you want to stay useless part of this community and stay here as a wind up merchant ? (I know you're better than this, that's why I try to stay kind to you) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Colored Sky 1,807 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 1 minute ago, Blue_Fox_ said: And what first team cbs did Barca have? What overall quality Barca has in the whole team? It isn't the same. But people want to take God knows what conclusion from signing Papy Djilobodji. That we're becoming irrelevant and such. Which is not very clever and only good for banter. I thought it was only banter but when I see people speak about this seriously ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Fox_ 2,086 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 30 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said: But people want to take God knows what conclusion from signing Papy Djilobodji. That we're becoming irrelevant and such. Which is not very clever and only good for banter. I thought it was only banter but when I see people speak about this seriously ... It's telling that someone at the club doesn't do his/her job properly. We knew since the 2014/15 season we needed a new cb (back then i thought only one cb would be enough, i think we need at least 2 now) So we chased Stones the whole summer in a clumsy pathetic way, when Everton didn't give up what was our answer? Laporte? Marquinhos? (Better players than Stones anyway) No, Djilobodji. We had a whole season to prepare ourselves to get a first team quality CB, when we didn't get our main target we didn't know what to do anymore and at deadline day we got this guy, a backup quality cb for a team that needed a first team quality cb, and the results are there for everyone to see, our defence is a pathetic mess. It's not how a club that wants to compete at the top level operates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bellion 170 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 1 hour ago, Blue Colored Sky said: Barca chased Laporte and ended with Vermaelen, Mathieu and Douglas. Won a treble. This means nothing really, Djilobodji transfer meant nothing but people want to take from this too much conclusions. Far too much. Absolutely zero relevance to Barcelona. The quality of Barca's first team speaks for itself. It means that Chelsea didn't have a plan B last summer and failed to strengthen the defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Colored Sky 1,807 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 7 minutes ago, Blue_Fox_ said: It's telling that someone at the club doesn't do his/her job properly. We knew since the 2014/15 season we needed a new cb (back then i thought only one cb would be enough, i think we need at least 2 now) So we chased Stones the whole summer in a clumsy pathetic way, when Everton didn't give up what was our answer? Laporte? Marquinhos? (Better players than Stones anyway) No, Djilobodji. We had a whole season to prepare ourselves to get a first team quality CB, when we didn't get our main target we didn't know what to do anymore and at deadline day we got this guy, a backup quality cb for a team that needed a first team quality cb, and the results are there for everyone to see, our defence is a pathetic mess. It's not how a club that wants to compete at the top level operates. I think club perfectly knows that they need new CB. But it's what I said in Transfer section. That they didn't settle for second best, finally. And I'm quite happy about it. Realistically, let's say who else we could get. Only Marquinhos is on the same level, talent. But it's PSG at the end, they don't have to sell. Laporte, Barca and Real try to buy him for a couple of year but Billbao doesn't want to sell. Their situation is that they have very small group of players to choose from so it's very hard to buy from them as they realistically don't need the money to replace such player as they won't have options to replace him with their Basque-only rule. So either throw 50m€ on Laporte or you won't buy him. 50m is the highest sum ever paid for a defender. Is he worth it ? No. Realistically, with cool emotions, the only one defender we could sign in the summer on good level, good age, not throwing money away is Abdennour. But it's the thing I wrote about settling for second best. Yes, Stones saga was a fiasco. But look at Manchester United for example. They want CB badly, they have money available but pool of players is very short. Barca settled for Mathieu and Vearmalen even though they want top class CB for years. Chelsea could do the same but I'm happy they didn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Colored Sky 1,807 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 5 minutes ago, bellion said: Absolutely zero relevance to Barcelona. The quality of Barca's first team speaks for itself. It means that Chelsea didn't have a plan B last summer and failed to strengthen the defense. Mate, Barca were in the same situation as Chelsea as they want top class CB. They signed Vermaelen who played 30 minutes or something last season. Chelsea didn't settle for that, they wait to buy proper CB this summer (maybe Marquinhos, Stones), alongside that they bought some guy from old scout recommandation who can be cheap cover. That's it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bellion 170 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 7 minutes ago, Blue Colored Sky said: Mate, Barca were in the same situation as Chelsea as they want top class CB. They signed Vermaelen who played 30 minutes or something last season. Chelsea didn't settle for that, they wait to buy proper CB this summer (maybe Marquinhos, Stones), alongside that they bought some guy from old scout recommandation who can be cheap cover. That's it. Your cheap cover would hold more water if Papy was staying instead of being loaned out in January. Citing Barcelona or whatever club comes to your fancy does NOT excuse the shambles of a transfer window. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.