Diego Costa

[CHOULO19 24,332]

Guys - I respect you both so much - please don't get into a childish fight over this - it's not worth it

No, I've quite enjoyed, tbh You know, it's good to get out the child inside once in a while and what not...

[Stingray 9,441]

No, I've quite enjoyed, tbh You know, it's good to get out the child inside once in a while and what not...

I know, feels good doesnt it [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji482]

[Fulham Broadway 17,299]

No, I've quite enjoyed, tbh You know, it's good to get out the child inside once in a while and what not...

I am going to give you a warning about that behaviour

Actually with that pedantic arguing you could give up engineering and become a lawyer.

[CHOULO19 24,332]

I am going to give you a warning about that behaviour

Actually with that pedantic arguing you could give up engineering and become a lawyer.

We could open a TC law firm if pedantic arguing in the winning quality!

[Pacquiao 1,834]

Fine, I'll get into a childish fight with you, it's been a long time since I got into one though

You said that you only knew how many he's won this season and not how many he's attempted, then you said that Squawka only displays how many he's won which is a blatant lie to childishly try to manipulate the stat (which you introduced into the debate) to your point of view, because the picture I posted is from fucking SQUAWKA!

I'm sorry, but I just found it hilarious that after YOU introduced a crap stat completely out of context, you then proceeded to say that it is completely irrelevant (and don't care about it) then you blatantly lied about it and its context and now you feel like you've won that 'debate' and that and that any unbiased (and unfortunate) person reading this will be convinced by your solid logic?! :lol:

no it wasnt a lie! i was using squawka's comparison matrix go and check that and you will see they dont show how many he attempted! so get your facts right before you accuse someone of lying!

and yes how many he hasnt won is irrelevant! your point was that he hasnt won a single headed duel, i proved to you that he has infact won 10 headed duels, which proves you wrong! so please explain how, how many he lost is relevant? you got proved wrong and clearly cant take it, you need to grow up and just take it on the chin.

[Stingray 9,441]

We could open a TC law firm if pedantic arguing in the winning quality!

Nice idea!

I want in btw ....

[Muzchap 8,966]

Nice idea!

I want in btw ....

Joining is a time consuming process apparently

[CHOULO19 24,332]

and yes how many he hasnt won is irrelevant! your point was that he hasnt won a single headed duel, i proved to you that he has infact won 10 headed duels, which proves you wrong!

Congrats, you've proven the most obvious hyperbole inaccurate. The equivalent of providing scientific evidence showing that it is impossible when your friend says he's so hungry he could eat a horse

But you've also, by pointing to the stat out of context which in turn prompted me to acquire the full stat, helped prove the actual point right: That Costa is shit at aerial duels. Cheers!

[Stingray 9,441]

Joining is a time consuming process apparently

But we have been here for a while my friend. [emoji108]

[Pacquiao 1,834]

Congrats, you've proven the most obvious hyperbole inaccurate. The equivalent of providing scientific evidence showing that it is impossible when your friend says he's so hungry he could eat a horse

But you've also, by pointing to the stat out of context which in turn prompted me to acquire the full stat, helped prove the actual point right: That Costa is shit at aerial duels. Cheers!

so funny seeing you desperately trying to backtrack now! you know what you said and you know you got proved wrong!

[Stingray 9,441]

so funny seeing you desperately trying to backtrack now! you know what you said and you know you got proved wrong!

You have a special mind, Paco. I say this as a psychologist [emoji6]

[Muzchap 8,966]

You have a special mind, Paco. I say this as a psychologist [emoji6]

Internet psychologist - as a large percentage of communication is non verbal or written - right :)

[Spike 12,049]

Nice idea!

I want in btw ....

What a terrible sign. It doesn't even state when the society was established.

[Stingray 9,441]

Internet psychologist - as a large percentage of communication is non verbal or written - right :)

Yup, this is Mehrabian's research.

But beware, this is only about emotional messages (TC much?). But it shows that if the forum would talk the each other irl, the issues would actually be minimal.

I believe that btw. I just had Rmpr at my place and I LOVED talking to him. It was like meeting a long lost Chelsea mate. He got drunk though :-)

[CHOULO19 24,332]

so funny seeing you desperately trying to backtrack now! you know what you said and you know you got proved wrong!

If you genuinely believe that then I apologize for and take back everything I've said on the last couple of pages!