Jump to content

I Got The Blues - Detailed player scout and tactics analysis: Steaua Bucharest


Barbara
 Share

Recommended Posts

Great work. But i think you have these reciprocated:

Players total rates total amount of contributions; (positive rate/negative rate):

I didn't want to change them before I ask you. Also where did you get the stats from. Don't tell me you did them yourself :fainthv9:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great work. But i think you have these reciprocated:

I didn't want to change them before I ask you. Also where did you get the stats from. Don't tell me you did them yourself :fainthv9:

yeah, it's the opposite... can you fix for me please in the article, I'll fix here.

And thanks a lot for reviewing it for me, sweetie

Of course I did it by myself :P

Sometimes winning a tackle can be vital others just a stupid stat. I'll be doing this analysis for the Chelsea Brazil site sort of often. I'll translate in English if people around here like it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, it's the opposite... can you fix for me please in the article, I'll fix here.

And thanks a lot for reviewing it for me, sweetie

I haven't uploaded it yet, so once you change it here it'll also be changed in the article as well. And you're welcome :)

Of course I did it by myself :P

Sometimes winning a tackle can be vital others just a stupid stat. I'll be doing this analysis for the Chelsea Brazil site sort of often. I'll translate in English if people around here like it too.

:worship:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha, brilliant . A very unique layout for an analysis. Enjoyable.

But, this was my job. :cry: *slowly cancels match download* :ph34r:

it's not sweetie.

The kind of scouting you do is different. This is more really rating statically the players for their most important actions in the game (positive and negative) giving them different weight depending on the importance the play have. Then there's a brief tactical analysis.

What you do is much more dynamic and less statistical than this. Go ahead and do it :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's not sweetie.

The kind of scouting you do is different. This is more really rating statically the players for their most important actions in the game (positive and negative) giving them different weight depending on the importance the play have. Then there's a brief tactical analysis.

What you do is much more dynamic and less statistical than this. Go ahead and do it :)

too late now. anyways, one kind of piece on this game is enough. good job once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

too late now. anyways, one kind of piece on this game is enough. good job once again.

I didn't now you were doing all post-match analysis... my bad...

I'm scheduled to do some post-match reports for CB and I thought I would translate them here... I won't get into your business anymore, sweetie ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't now you were doing all post-match analysis... my bad...

I'm scheduled to do some post-match reports for CB and I thought I would translate them here... I won't get into your business anymore, sweetie ;)

haha no no. It's not my job or anything. Continue, I was lazy anyways. :P

I'll get mine up along with yours from the next game. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

haha no no. It's not my job or anything. Continue, I was lazy anyways. :P

I'll get mine up along with yours from the next game. ;)

I won't be doing this for every match... I just didn't know you'll be doing for all matches, Sherri. It's not my job to do it here either (only in CB), I just feel bad because it seems like I took away something you were supposed to do. sorri

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't be doing this for every match... I just didn't know you'll be doing for all matches, Sherri. It's not my job to do it here either (only in CB), I just feel bad because it seems like I took away something you were supposed to do. sorri

I was just kidding around. It's fine , the more the merrier. makes the forum much more interesting. nothing to feel bad about. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing work. This is how stats should be looked at, in the context of the match and situations and not on their own.

thanks, that's the objective so they can be contextualized and make more sense.

Even then you see Schurrle as only the 5th more influential player in the pitch statistically and he was much more important than that.

But on the other hand Ivan's and Luiz's stats can show how important and how they basically made no mistake (Iva literally didn't). So one can conclude that although the opposition was very weak - and they were - defensively we have been immense making the quality gap even more pronounced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great article.

Especially the part on switching formation and organization by Oscar.

So technically he is better than Mata?=

no, they just have different profiles and Oscar is more versatile tactically, but I don't think he's more technical than Mata or vice-versa. Different players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice analysis. However, Schurlle was the man of the match for me. Before then I'd been wondering why chelsea spent 18m pounds on him, but i now have my answer. Etoo also put in a decent performance. The opposition is not weak as some people say, trying to belittle our performance, afterall they beat us last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You