Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and join in with the discussions! Click Here

Sebastian Jung


Spike

Recommended Posts

Jung isn't exactly a top priority being a RB. But I do believe he has the ability to play across the back four and even fill in as a DM. I could be very mistaken though. One of the outstanding performers for high flying Eintracht Frankfurt, Jung is another in a long line of fantastic and exciting young Germans. Only 22 but already has over 100 professional games under his belt and all for Frankfurt.

A very solid utility?

sebastianjung.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Kind of already have Azpi, Wallace and Ivanovic to go there if needed

Well Ivan is fairly rubbish as a RB and not that great as CB if you ask me. And Wallace...it's a bit early to claim he is cover for right back, isn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I know, I said that in my OP...

I'd still sign him.

But why? We're well covered at RB with a young Spanish international as our first choice and cover in Ivanovic and potentially Wallace. It's just overkill to bring in another specialist RB. I get that you have scouted this player yourself and you like him but our resources would be better used elsewhere, you know, like in midfield and attack where we're actually short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why? We're well covered at RB with a young Spanish international as our first choice and cover in Ivanovic and potentially Wallace. It's just overkill to bring in another specialist RB. I get that you have scouted this player yourself and you like him but our resources would be better used elsewhere, you know, like in midfield and attack where we're actually short.

But how do we know that Wallace is even that good? I've never seen him play and I'm not going to put faith into a player I know nothing of just because he is already at Chelsea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But how do we know that Wallace is even that good? I've never seen him play and I'm not going to put faith into a player I know nothing of just because he is already at Chelsea.

Even ignoring Wallace we still have a clear number 1 RB (Azpi) and cover (Ivanovic). Then there's Omeuro who is playing RB in Holland and doing well by all accounts.

RB is one of the few positions in the team where we're absolutely fine for the foreseeable future and don't need to do anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even ignoring Wallace we still have a clear number 1 RB (Azpi) and cover (Ivanovic). Then there's Omeuro who is playing RB in Holland and doing well by all accounts.

RB is one of the few positions in the team where we're absolutely fine for the foreseeable future and don't need to do anything.

1. I think Ivanovic should be sold.

2. I've never watched those two players.

As far as I'm concerned Chelsea has only one player that can play week in week out as a reliable RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. I think Ivanovic should be sold.

2. I've never watched those two players.

As far as I'm concerned Chelsea has only one player that can play week in week out as a reliable RB.

Well I've never watched Jung and this is the first time I'm hearing of him and I don't want him anywhere near Stamford Bridge. Even him playing against us at home in a friendly would upset me a great deal. I hate him. I'm going to call him Sebastian Dung from this day forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I've never watched Jung and this is the first time I'm hearing of him and I don't want him anywhere near Stamford Bridge. Even him playing against us at home in a friendly would upset me a great deal. I hate him. I'm going to call him Sebastian Dung from this day forward.

Mate, now you're just taking the piss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nathaniel Clyne would be the better option if we ignore Azpi's existence, potential-wise, had a great game against us last month. Home grown too, although I think we're just about in the 'quota' (8/25) even with Frank's departure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nathaniel Clyne would be the better option if we ignore Azpi's existence, potential-wise, had a great game against us last month. Home grown too, although I think we're just about in the 'quota' (8/25) even with Frank's departure.

Clyne is a Chelsea fan same as Shaw, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know Luke Shaw tweeted his love for Chelsea, not sure about Clyne. Although judging from his last performance against us, he was looking to impress.

It'd be nice if the back four was English but that's a luxury and not a need. Clyne is a solid player and could be a decent signing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...