Gilvorak 3,734 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 You seriously comparing that donkey Sanogo to Bamford? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,146 Posted August 1, 2015 Share Posted August 1, 2015 You seriously comparing that donkey Sanogo to Bamford?No, but the situations are similar. Sanogo was sent on loan there because Wenger thought he would be a regular. Because there other strikers were so bad before Glenn Murray returned from his loan at Reading, he was put straight in the team but then after struggling for the first couple matches he never regained his place in the team. Hopefully Bamford scores down there but this is the Prem and he is competing with several strikers there. It is easy to say he is better than all of them but he does not have prem experience and it will not be a simple case like Lukaku of being guaranteed a start in his loans. He will need to work for it and right now if Murray stays (has been linked with Bournemouth) he might start of as the no.1 striker because of his form for Palace towards the end of last season. Anyway, if Bamford is good enough to make it here he will score goals down there and then we should have nothing to worry about with how much starts he gets at Palace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mak 4,459 Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 Probably should've went to Bournemouth or Norwich. It sucks, because if we have a bad time with our strikers this season and Bamford was to do really well, the natural process would be to have him in the squad next year. I don't think that will happen now, I don't think Pardew will give him a proper chance. I fucking hate it when our players are signed for squad depth and nothing more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/aug/03/connor-wickham-signs-crystal-palace-sunderland?CMP=share_btn_twWickham has officially joined Crystal Palace... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 But Dwight Gayle is going on loan to Fulham. Pardew clearly rates Patch or he wouldn't be letting Gayle leave, simple as that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted August 3, 2015 Share Posted August 3, 2015 http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/aug/03/connor-wickham-signs-crystal-palace-sunderland?CMP=share_btn_twWickham has officially joined Crystal Palace...Expect Wickham to get 3 starts then benched Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jase 43,479 Posted August 8, 2015 Share Posted August 8, 2015 Bamford starts on the bench as Crystal Palace take on Norwich at Carrow Road. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stats 7,146 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Although very early in the season, I am already starting to have my doubts about this loan. He just is not going to get enough starts. He is effectively 3rd choice striker there. Murray looks like he will stay although there still might be movement. He started the game against Bournemouth. Now Wickham, I think will get the nod for the game against Arsenal because of his physical appearance. Pardew, today referred to Chamakh as a player who will be like a new signing if they can get him fit. It is just not going to be a club where he will be able to get consecutive starts. Even if he does start one game, he could easily be rotated the next. He didn't even come on against Norwich which shows the strength in depth they have. For Palace, it is exellent. For us and Bamford is it going to be worth it? Not sure. Think there are other PL teams which would have been more suitable. Sunderland, maybe Norwich, maybe WBA. I hope I am proved wrong but like I was saying before, he will not easily get in that Palace team. Especially now they have bought Wickham for £9m. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyikolajevics 2,700 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Although very early in the season, I am already starting to have my doubts about this loan. He just is not going to get enough starts. He is effectively 3rd choice striker there. Murray looks like he will stay although there still might be movement. He started the game against Bournemouth. Now Wickham, I think will get the nod for the game against Arsenal because of his physical appearance. Pardew, today referred to Chamakh as a player who will be like a new signing if they can get him fit. It is just not going to be a club where he will be able to get consecutive starts. Even if he does start one game, he could easily be rotated the next. He didn't even come on against Norwich which shows the strength in depth they have. For Palace, it is exellent. For us and Bamford is it going to be worth it? Not sure. Think there are other PL teams which would have been more suitable. Sunderland, maybe Norwich, maybe WBA. I hope I am proved wrong but like I was saying before, he will not easily get in that Palace team. Especially now they have bought Wickham for £9m.Nobody sad it would be easy. It's perfectly normal that managers pferer their own players, but if Bamford is that good he will earn his place. If he can't outpower Murray and Wickham then he shouldn't come back to Chelsea. Costa, Falcao and Rémy are a different category. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Nobody sad it would be easy. It's perfectly normal that managers pferer their own players, but if Bamford is that good he will earn his place. If he can't outpower Murray and Wickham then he shouldn't come back to Chelsea. Costa, Falcao and Rémy are a different category.i agree with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clockwork 1,794 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Nobody sad it would be easy. It's perfectly normal that managers pferer their own players, but if Bamford is that good he will earn his place. If he can't outpower Murray and Wickham then he shouldn't come back to Chelsea. Costa, Falcao and Rémy are a different category.i agree with thisShit based on that logic Spurs should have sold Harry Kane before his breakout season. Since he was struggling for playing Time and performance. It is not that cut and dry, few things the player can control. CP best interest is different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolhead23 1,147 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Nobody sad it would be easy. It's perfectly normal that managers pferer their own players, but if Bamford is that good he will earn his place. If he can't outpower Murray and Wickham then he shouldn't come back to Chelsea. Costa, Falcao and Rémy are a different category.Good point however how is he going to prove himself if he doesnt get a chance ...Josh Mceachran was on a good momentum when he was loaned to Swansea, look what happened. His career actually went backwards instead of going ahead. I really hope Bamford gets good chances which he can grab with both hands... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyikolajevics 2,700 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Shit based on that logic Spurs should have sold Harry Kane before his breakout season. Since he was struggling for playing Time and performance.It is not that cut and dry, few things the player can control. CP best interest is different.Well, I firmly believe that Spurs and Chelsea are a completely different category. At Chelsea FC only winning is accaptable, we only need top quality players. Kane would be playing for Vitesse if he joined Chelsea academy. Even Lukaku failed to earn a spot in the sqad altough he scored many-many goals for Everton and WBA. Pat must show some extraordinary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyikolajevics 2,700 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Good point however how is he going to prove himself if he doesnt get a chance ...Josh Mceachran was on a good momentum when he was loaned to Swansea, look what happened. His career actually went backwards instead of going ahead. Josh's managers had seen him every day, he would have played if he was that good. Alan Pardew is an outstanding manager, if playing Bamford would be benefitial for CPFC he will name him in the starting eleven. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ulvhedin 526 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Good point however how is he going to prove himself if he doesnt get a chance ...Josh Mceachran was on a good momentum when he was loaned to Swansea, look what happened. His career actually went backwards instead of going ahead. I really hope Bamford gets good chances which he can grab with both hands... You really think that it was bad few months of loan that broke down Josh? Its just excuse for him, his head was never in right place Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolhead23 1,147 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Josh's managers had seen him every day, he would have played if he was that good. Alan Pardew is an outstanding manager, if playing Bamford would be benefitial for CPFC he will name him in the starting eleven.Not sure what did they not see in him to give him a chance as a third striker instead of pinning hope in a 29yr old brittle player ... Anyways different story. Palace already have 2 strikers in front of Bamford which will be more preferred players than a loanee ... this decrease his chances a lot to get into the starting eleven. Having said that, I hope he get a chance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolhead23 1,147 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 You really think that it was bad few months of loan that broke down Josh? Its just excuse for him, his head was never in right placeThat was the start of things from which he never recovered ...How can you explain someone who was supposedly the next best thing to just another 18yr old player in a span of a year ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iseah100 5,612 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 HE BETTER GET GAMES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 HE BETTER GET GAMEShe needs games if he wants to break into the chelsea squad next season Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the wes 7,212 Posted August 14, 2015 Share Posted August 14, 2015 Shit based on that logic Spurs should have sold Harry Kane before his breakout season. Since he was struggling for playing Time and performance.It is not that cut and dry, few things the player can control. CP best interest is different.chelsea have better strikers options than spurs mate lukaku better than bamford and he couldnt break into the chelsea starting line up what chance does bamford have if he cant break into the c palace starting line up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.