Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Romelu Lukaku

Jose M

By Jose M,
in Strikers

 Share

Recommended Posts

didierforever

didierforever 7,349

Posted
Posted

32 appearances and how many starts... 10 in the EPL.

Funny how you think we needed to spend an additional amount for ams when we needed to strengthen CF, CM and the backline more.

Jose's teams are sure built from ams, not cms or cbs or cfs.. YEAP!

I like you though because you make me laugh.

Hahahaha.... dude. U do get that it was not me that spent the money on schurrle and willian. Jose did. I am only trying to make someone who has no clue about football understand as to why he did that. So if u think, I am laughable to think that we did right in buying them, then jose should get the same treatment, right? LOL.

We needed to strengthen on backlone??? Lol. Gc-jt-dl as cbs. Azpu and iva as rbs. Bertrand and cole as lbs. Lol.

U r absolutely right dude. This chelsea team is more reliant on STs rather than AM and cms. Oh wait!!!!! Lol.

The feeling is mutual dude. Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 16.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Atholy
Atholy

I'm afraid not a lot of you will have seen the interview (let alone be able to understand a single word they say ). So here's the summary of the most important things that have been said: He's feeling

Melanicus
Melanicus

Big words from Drog.

petr.breu
petr.breu

Wrong shirt at the wrong moment Romelu

Posted Images

Eligius

Eligius 121

Posted
Posted

Dude, why don't u ask me how many starts willian had this season???LOLOLOLOL.

also how many did mata and kdb in half a season. :lol: :lol:

Mata had 11 and KDB had 1 or 2 i think....

Also, I wasn't debating whether signing both of them were wrong ( that a whole different discussion). I was debating that you think we didn't sell ft9 because of FFP and used the signings of both Willian and Schurrle as an example on how complete bs your so called financial statements were...

Hey, I heard Remy doesnt have a release clause or a relegation clause in his contract.. NOT

Link to comment
Share on other sites
didierforever

didierforever 7,349

Posted
Posted

Mata had 11 and KDB had 1 or 2 i think....

Also, I wasn't debating whether signing both of them were wrong ( that a whole different discussion). I was debating that you think we didn't sell ft9 because of FFP and used the signings of both Willian and Schurrle as an example on how complete bs your so called financial statements were...

Hey, I heard Remy doesnt have a release clause or a relegation clause in his contract.. NOT

Oh again!!!! Ummm... not in the mood to spoon feed u everythinf.

Remy has a release clause. Great. Cos THAT is the thing every football fan wants to know, right? I mean loic remy is THE footballer of the generation of whom every detail is explicitly known to every football fan. NOT. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eligius

Eligius 121

Posted
Posted

Oh again!!!! Ummm... not in the mood to spoon feed u everythinf.

Remy has a release clause. Great. Cos THAT is the thing every football fan wants to know, right? I mean loic remy is THE footballer of the generation of whom every detail is explicitly known to every football fan. NOT. :lol:

Well, this whole thing was based on Remy release clause and how you thought you know the QPR board and Remy.

Even though the place to be even said how qpr messed up financially.

No the reason he was sent out on loan is because he earns about £70,000 p/w and QPR play in the Championship. Their finances are a mess so they needed to remove at least some of his wages from their bill, as well as getting a fee from Newcastle for the loan.

Not true. It's highly likely that even if QPR got promoted these guys would either be loaned out again or sold because QPR are massively in debt. They would probably look to go a more frugal route to achieve survival rather than repeat the mistakes of before.

Highly likely. As for Granero he probably could play for Cardiff, but Cardiff couldn't afford him. QPR DOUBLED his wages when he joined them so moving him on is very difficult.

Hey, I can make up random numbers too for transfer fees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
didierforever

didierforever 7,349

Posted
Posted

Well, this whole thing was based on Remy release clause and how you thought you know the QPR board and Remy.

Even though the place to be even said how qpr messed up financially.

Hey, I can make up random numbers too for transfer fees.

Is not that what u have been doing? :lol:

Atleast I can own up and say I was wtong about one thing, remy's release clause.which is better than going on and on about FFP when u have no clue about it. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eligius

Eligius 121

Posted
Posted

Is not that what u have been doing? :lol:

Atleast I can own up and say I was wtong about one thing, remy's release clause.which is better than going on and on about FFP when u have no clue about it. :lol:

Even though I had a whole discussion with another poster about it and he agree though.....

BAck to accounting 101 you go!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bir_CFC

Bir_CFC 3,455

Posted
Posted

What's funny is that you guys are just arguing about the most random things haha. Going off random tangents every 2 posts haha.

It started with Torres, you were both right since Elgius was looking at the impact to Chelsea's financial outlook in the FUTURE while didierforever was focused on the FFP impact whenever he was sold. It was a misunderstanding clearly because both things aren't even related.

The rest of the discussion is beyond me haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
zolayes

zolayes 14,489

Posted
Posted

What's funny is that you guys are just arguing about the most random things haha. Going off random tangents every 2 posts haha.

It started with Torres, you were both right since Elgius was looking at the impact to Chelsea's financial outlook in the FUTURE while didierforever was focused on the FFP impact whenever he was sold. It was a misunderstanding clearly because both things aren't even related.

The rest of the discussion is beyond me haha.

I found it easy to deal with ,,just scrolled straight past all the FFP crap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter