Term-X

Great post from Killamanjaro. LMAO! To say that after almost 5 years of Kalouless, is just ignorance.

Jesus Navas is worth more than 17m. His value is £23-30m, Sevilla will demand the world and everything in it for him.

Ferreira's 32 years old on the 20th. Although a right back is certainly not a must right now, we need an attacking midfielder.

Amsterdam > Soho

14 professional football clubs reside in London. Making for a respectable collection of trophy's, Yet one is missing.. It's one particular set of fans which remain in a delusional state, despite going 6 years without a single trophy. Sure, as a club they can boast 9 more league titles, and only 4 more FA cups. Nevertheless they remain without what makes a football club supposedly 'Great'. London is the home of football, and the first team to claim the UEFA Champions league will have the ultimate boast. As Chelsea fans we have been nailed to a cross in Europe, almost teased by the Cheshire cat that is Platini. So close, yet so far. Which is exactly why it would be the ultimate victory. I've expressed my dismay at the luck and criminal referring, but can anyone really argue this competition isn't exactly what we need. European glory is the sole reason Roman hired Carlo, I mean lets face it. Ancelotti doesn't have the most desirable league record amongst managers. I remember a few fans on here saying they would rather win the league, in the fear of siding weak teams. In order for older players to gain rest for European nights. This view I agree with, considering the gamble involved. The age and size of our squad would certainly be a problem, not to mention the frequent injury's to key players. Or is the current side psychologically damaged, thus being unable to defibrillate their attitudes from nights of heartbreak and injustice. Should a football club set the champions league as an achievable target. Or is it just a case of 'luck permitting'. Would being the first ever London club to win it, be an achievement worthy of respect?

Indeed. Andy townsend is just cringe worthy. In fact... Itv is an awful channel overall, not just for football. Channel 4 have great documentary's, comedy such as peep show and curb your enthusiasm on more4. Itv = shitty celebrity reality shows. No wonder they can't produce sport coverage either.

Hate to burst some peoples bubble, but Zola is too much of a nice guy to manage a Roman Abramovich team. You could say the same for Carlo, but he's won the champions league twice, Zola's managerial portfolio is practically non existent.

Because Hamisk would be a realistic signing. We don't talk about Messi or Ronaldo because they would literally be impossible. Hamisk/Cavini are realistic, and they play for a team outside the champions league.

Lmao at the language Tommy uses. cool.. damn.. my africans He's becoming a cult icon at TC.

Nope. I'm aware of that site though, might have a look.

The Daily Mail paid someone to put it up. Publicity stunt.

^ Great ball from Hamsik, nice overall move from napoli.. they have a quality team.

If we sign a player from Napoli, I'd rather it be Hamsik.

So you value tap-ins higher than chance creation?

Here we go again with the insults... Notice nobody other than you goes down this road.

Because they have proved themselves to be quality. Lmao at the usual "He puts in effort, arh look he's puttin in effort" Fuck that, i'd rather that game time be given to the youngsters.

Exactly.

Because that's all he has to offer! lmao, whenever people on here get into discussions over Kalou they bring up his stats. "oww he can't be shite if he's got 50 goals" etc etc

Jose, Carlo etc are working with what they have.

Awful comparison. Kalou is a winger, Inzaghi is a striker. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQdYkZAv53M I'd like to see Kalou attempt that..

50 tap-ins for Kalou.. lmao, just goes to show how misleading stats really are. Exactly.

£30m + Drogba/Anelka?

Kalou giving us a perfect example of how on earth he manages to score goals here.