Rmpr

Yeah, that looks awesome, way more important than the new phones (I just learned that is an iPhone 5 Cheaper now that is actually just an iPhone 5 Plastic, lol)... I do think they are using colors that look kinda girly though, but whatever!

Is there a new iPhone? Let me guess, same form factor and a few useless improvements for 600-700 bucks (unlocked)?

Shut up Tom, we all know you post memes and gifs cause you have a small pennis!

I am back bitches! So many comeback messages, I cant express how awesome it was to see so many people asking me to return! THANK YOU! Two things: 1) I will be posting something on the 'Constructive Criticism' Thread tomorrow. I hope people agree with me or that it makes the members on this forum restart behaving as civilized Chelsea fans. 2) I feel offended people saying Stingray is the boss of this place or whatever. This faggot was nobody when I was already the king of the pub (I even made people have all Brazilian flags, lol). So, this Stingay dude should have never returned and stayed blocked. Fuck! Anyways, good to be back, lets put this shit back on track!!!!!

Guys (and gurls), I am here to thank everyone that made my time in TC amazing and unforgettable, I cant express how much thankful I am!!! I am leaving the forums for a period because it is not what I want it to be anymore. There is nothing more than complains, fights and swearing (not that I havent had my fair share of it) and members with different views cant cope together for a long time. Once I feel this has returned to its normal state, I will comeback. But until I see members like Kojo and Zolayes (who dont contribute anymore) causing TalkChelsea to be a mess and others very new members acting as complete ass lickers, I wont be around. I love you and I wish you all the best, the memories will carry on with me forever. A big fucking thank you to everyone!

And that is why there is a blocking system...

LOL, of course they havent foind a problem, I did nothing wrong! Caps lock doesnt make your point any more valid, but lets go... 1) Hazard and Totti are anything but False 9s or False 9s look alike. That is factually wrong! 2) Droping deep or whatever is not having False 9 attributes, it just isnt. Jo compensated the absence of Oscar, but since when does it make him a have False 9 attributes? 3) Not one single argument you used categorize a False 9, the problem lies in your definition of it. Can you please explain it to me? 4) Scolari's ability to adapt? JESUS, something that Big Phill definitely is afraid of is change. He never ever changes the way he buolds his teams. I have closely followed him for more than a decade, and all the abilities you credit to him, he does not have. He always uses the full baks as attacker, he always has a DM and he awlays has a proper striker (proper). 5) I think you are giving way too much read to a simple game (one that couldnt even fill a 70k stadium). It does not give you that much material for an in depth analyses as you are giving it. Just wait for bigger games and more important sotuations so you can jump to conclusions.

But that was not what Jo did dude! Not in the slightest!!!! Just because he was outside of the box, it doesnt mean he has False 9 like attributes, IT DOESNT! Watch him playing for Atletico Mineiro and you will see that he is just like any other striker in the world who is mobile. It doesnt mean it has any type of relationship with a False 9 like attributes. Diego Tardelli is actually a much more False 9 alike than Jo... You are reading way too much on a meaningless game against fucking Australia (I love you Spike), it is like me doing a super review on Chelsea's 8-0 win against Villa last year and make it as an important game that defines players. It has no overall importance! Besides, this is in the wrong thread. MHS is for Chelsea threads, Football Banter is for everything else....

OMG, BUT THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FALSE NINE, GOOOOOSSSHH! You cant use a wrong terminology just because it is easier. False 9 means not a typical striker who stays inside the penalty box, is has absolutely nothing to wih link-up plays, NOTHING. Jo played very much like Torres is doing with Mourinho, is he a False nine? NOOO! The two goals he scored makes your theory completely fall apart. A False nine would never be where he was, because that is a typical striker kind of movement/positioning. And above all of that, Felipao would be the last person on Earth to use a strike-less like team, he would be literally screaming at you right now. Aguero, Pato, Cavani and Falcao do that a lot, unbelievable. Do you actually watch football? I mean.... 1) Aguero does that more than anyother thing in the world, it is hillarious. 2) Pato is the same thing, he is often outside the box due to Guerrero being there. 3) Cavani is Pato with Ibra instead of Guerrero. 4) Falcao had to pretty much do the link-up by himself in Atletico (just watch his Copa Del Rey goal va Real). It is an avsolute joke to say they dont participate in te link-up as Jo does, because they actually do it more often than him!!! However, I am not saying Jo didnt do what you wrote nor that your reading of the gane was bad (it was actually quite good). But to use False 9 is insulting Big Phill's basic principles!!! Also, this is my way, if you hae a problem with that, you can always click the report button. It is not like I give a damn about it...

That is participating in the link-up play, which has nothing to do with False 9! Every fucking striker is False 9 according to your logic. Rooney, Aguero, Lewandowski, Pato, Cavani, Falcao, etc... The terminology you are using is completely and absurdingly wrong, but I agree he did all of that.

Not true, when I was gettig voted, I was clearly one of the best posters in the forum. I had a voice in every thread and I embraced many intelligent debates more than anyone at that time. As you say, 90% of my current posts are outside the football forums nowadays. Hence I never get nominated anymore. That is just your point of view, which is clearly not what the majority thinks, hence we always win the award! You and 7 more (according to you) believe those winning are not worth it. Sorry, but no one will fucking care, because there are many more who think otherwise. And since this is a democracy, what the bigger percentage of the active members think will have the final decision, whether you like it or not...

Still amazingly wrong!

Stopped at Jo's false 9...

I am doing what? I very rarely post GIFs or jokes outside the General Threads... To be quite honest, some of those complaining (you, zolayes, etc) post more 'funny' stuff in innapropriate places than I do! I just find stupid and immature to think your opinion is more valid than the majority in here. It is a loser reaction.

LOL, this has become ridiculous! People are overreacting to their bones, especially those defending 'football' discussions/members/whatver...

Nour, what do you think of Hezbollah? Are they the super duper evil terrorist group USA says or are they just a strict religious political party as they claim?

Hahaha, quite some time ago mate! Choulo still has it because he is hypnotised by its sexiness...

@, I bought a Chelsea clothe for my cat!

What does it say?

Than you cant come and say 'it was [higher] though'. Because it was only better for people like you and Terminator X. It doesnt mean it was really better, it is just your own opinions!Sorry if I am rude, but people just like to moan because new members rule the party nowadays...

First, it was a joke.Second, that is what you think. It doesnt make it a fact. Again people confusing their own opinions with facts! Third, this bullshit of 'back then' it was so much better (not only regarding you nor the forum) gets on my nerves.

JT is not the saint some think, but he is not a scumbag either...

Why? Are the winners shorter now?

Hahahaha, you do have a point! I just am of the opinion nominations and a poll is by far the best possible format for the award. It is how democracy is... It is just like The Oscars, there will always be criticism and people upset with who they think should or shouldnt win it. But in the end, whoever got the most votes wins and people just have to suck it. Be that for reason number 1, 2 or 3.

Wow, staff choosing the members is a bit anti-democratic, dont you think? CHOULO took the words out of my mind, this is a democracy and the best way to enforce it is by making people equally important, aka: universal voting. No one's opinion is more valid than others, and if the majority decides a certain member deserves to win, so be it. It doesnt matter the reasons behind their logic, it is not more valid if you chose the award winner for football/posting reasons or not! It is ridiculous for members to come here criticizing someone they think doesnt deserve it because he didnt give his greatest contributions in the football threads or hasnt been that much active!!! I got very upset with some people when WHS won it, for insrance... Blocking the past two/three winners is a good way to allow some rotation in it, but I have already suggested that when I won it last November and I was ignored. So it is nice to see Alex giving it a thought. Anyways, the format is fine, people who dont get voted will always complain though, no matter how it is done...