Stingray

Lol! the kid is playing well that second half. We will have to watch Eto'o kill Liverfool.

Edit: missed a defender there lmao. Luiz in the pivot :-) Come'on Blues !!

Boom Lukaku :-)

Ow damned! The Arse ....

Listening to an argument and understanding why people say things before calling them 'retards, bourgeous, political correctness claims, laughable, idiots' will go a long way in my book. In others books as well: Instead of fostering the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance from another: dare to listen, think and question your opinions. The other party might just have a point.

Going to have to request you keep it to yourself mate. Its for the greater good. Cognitive dissonance reduction at its best. Accept what you already believe, discount what differs. Precisely why I found this thread (the last pages) cringeworthy: it is not a debate, but a repitition of fixed standpoints and slating of others (eg. Lefty bourgeous or whatever you called them)

Fine its just you said it was a 'cringe worthy thread.' I don't see how it is. If the opinion fits with mine, i'll consider it And if the opinion does not fit yours?

Well if people want to talk about politics its not for you to say that they shouldn't. I didn't mate. I said : in MY account. Reread it. It was an opinion, is that allowed?

That's what Anelka should do. That's why its in the General Chat bit. Obviously Obviously. Wait till it spreads like it already has in the Anelka thread. If it is just political talk ok. If you have Israelites or Jewish members talking about Nazi symbolics, contemporal gestures and Muslims are put into the mix with a slice of todays middle east geopolitical situation while some righties babble about left bourgeous without a clue about the Front National connection in casu, adding a (anglosaxon) political correctness insult on an international forum, what do you think happens? A sour milkshake conflated with misconceptions adding nothing to clarify the debate. Peace.

So do I, really mate! But exchanging words and all that jazz isn't being dishonest. Or is it?

Cringe worthy thread, really. Politics and sports don't mix in my account.

And he did just that. So why and when was he dishonest (don't take the daily fail spin doctor stuff into account)?

Bullshit! Aguero at 20/21 had 17 league goals and in the following season had 12 league goals. Lukaku has got 8 PL from 13 league starts already and is way on course to get up to the 20 mark. Jesus Christ, he goes 5 games without scoring and all of a sudden he is not our quality. RVP had his dry spells last season and this season too but quality will always eventually show. When you are 20, playing every week because you are much better than the other strikers there it is natural for him to slack of a little. But get your facts right please because if you compare what Aguero done to Lukaku at the age of 19, while Lukaku was at WBA, you cannot compare the two. Lukaku got 17 league goals right last season at a much inferior team. Find me proof to show Aguero done more than Lukaku at around the same age. And also many players in there 20's, like Drogba had not even been on the big stage and you are hear judging Lukaku at 20. Give him a break! He has been nothing short of excellent this season and is a big reason why they are up there with the likes of City, us, Arsenal and Liverpool. Can't even believe you had one person like your post, let alone bloody 3! Sorry your post is absolute rubbish and untrue. He is showing signs every season that he is going to be a world class striker and he is getting better and better! True, i checked his numbers and it was bollocks. The only reason I didn't react is because the belgian fanboy or Lukaku FC shit always happens when we post. Thanks for calling that bluff.

When was he dishonest? I don't get it tbh.

Always happens when different reference frames get mixed while making moral/political statements

Not another winger/am .... Reus is so not an option. <br /><br />A true cm plzzzzzzzz !

If I may, I think the issue that bushman (and even LDN) we're trying to make is that: Who determines what is recognized as antisemitic and what is not? There are a lot of gray areas just like there is with racism, homophobia...etc There are also quite a lot of entangled areas. On the surface, Zionism is about Jews and often Zionism is synonymous with the establishment (oil and weapons companies) but being antiestablishment does not make you antisemitic. Politicians always use those gray and entangled areas to suppress opinions and causes by labeling them immoral and not "politically correct". It is strategy that is used by both left and right wings. This. It even had a name in ideology studies: the principle of alternating tenets. Originally coined first by Destutt de Tracy in the 18th century even. Tactics as old as hookers tbh.

Examples, but no definition padawan! Really, technical ability is the degree in which you can make the ball do what you want it to do (regularly). some can't, some try, some can a bit but compensate with physicality, some reaaaaaaally can (Ronaldo, Ronaldinho, Messi, .... ) Technical ability !

Amazing ... made me push a tear away tbh ...

BUMP FOR GLORY !

I tweeted the reporter and he said it is a quote from a weekendinterview Het Laatste Nieuws (his paper) did with the NT coach. To appear in the paper today. Confirmed. Ps: he also said Lukaku indeed talks too much and Mou is correct to say he should shut up, lmaoooo

Wuuuuuuuuut ?

Any Belgians care to confirm this? Kristof Terreur is normally pretty reliable, but I couldn't find anything in the belgian papers. Even nothing on Sporza and they would surely bring this from the NT coach. I see on Hristof's timeline this is pretty recent though .... Bizar. All reports on KDB are on him wanting to ve sold and Mou preferring a loan to Atletico.