Blue Traveler

Oh, come off it Yes it was a wonder strike, but he has no business being more than 20 meters out of goal a full 4-5 seconds after we lost the ball and Stoke stared the counter. But it's a mistake that he will learn from and thankfully it did not end up hurting us, so we can all laugh about it now.

It is a one in a million goal, but this is the one time in that million. A goalkeeping mistake, no doubt about it. His position was normal for the possession being where it was, but he was completely un-alive to the situation. Severe lapse in concentration. No goalkeeper should be beaten from that distance.
If Cech had have let that in, there would be people calling for his head, say he was "finished" and say he should be sold. It is a mistake, but he will learn from it. Thankfully, like last week, it didn't cost us. The football gods are smiling on us for a change.

Fuck you Frank. Won them another 3 points. Piece of shit bastard traitor.

All this nostalgic, heritage bullshit is what's holding us back.
We've outgrown our home. If we want to progress as a football club, we have to move stadium. Stamford Bridge will just continue to pull us back from everyone else. We earn £35 million less than Arsenal every season. That's 1 world class player we could buy on a season basis without FFP being effected.

You like numbers? go support Manure, Barca, Real or even scumpool.

With regards to Sunday match i think Jose made the right decision to play Drogba. He is not fit enough i say but we couldn't play Costa and play him on Sunday again. Remy just arrived without any experience in CL nights. i would've played Drogba ahead of Remy/Costa.
The problem was we didn't take our chances. That Cesc clear cut chance in the 1st half should've been in the back of the net 100 percent. We were a little complacent and shaky at the back and Hazard was a lil selfish in this game.

"Are you seriously going to let a one night stand ruin your 12 years of marriage, think of all the memories of those 12 years and forget the fact that she screwed your colleague"

For starters he could try not to hurt the feelings of the fans that paid him, cheered him, supported him and loved him for 13 years. He has to be extremely naive and far removed from reality not to think his decision to join our direct rival would not have been well received by the blues faithfuls.

If you put it that way we, the fans, also aren't obligated to see him as a Chelsea legend and to love him unconditionally. by the same token, he was just a well paid mercenary professional who did is job and moved on to another job. Let's yank the soul, passion and emotion out of football, it's so much fun that way.

LOL fuckking LMOF. here comes the extension!
The amount of idiocy and foolishness in here is pitiful and pathetic at the same time.
Now with this contract extension he's revealing his true hypocrite mercenary face! His intentions always were to stay in England as long as someone willing to pay it be it City or Spurs he wouldn't give shit if the money is right and CFC fans still think he has their love in his heart! he almost cried after the match!!! LOL!!! it's only about money you dumb fools cause a mercenary and money grubber is what he is. The only things he really cares for other stuff are just a bunch of bullshit.

LOL fuckking LMOF. here comes the extension!
The amount of idiocy and foolishness in here is pitiful and pathetic at the same time.
Now with this contract extension he's revealing his true hypocrite mercenary face! His intentions always were to stay in England as long as someone willing to pay it be it City or Spurs he wouldn't give shit if the money is right and CFC fans still think he has their love in his heart! he almost cried after the match!!! LOL!!! it's only about money you dumb fools cause a mercenary and money grubber is what he is. The only things he really cares for other stuff are just a bunch of bullshit.

LOL fuckking LMOF. here comes the extension!
The amount of idiocy and foolishness in here is pitiful and pathetic at the same time.
Now with this contract extension he's revealing his true hypocrite mercenary face! His intentions always were to stay in England as long as someone willing to pay it be it City or Spurs he wouldn't give shit if the money is right and CFC fans still think he has their love in his heart! he almost cried after the match!!! LOL!!! it's only about money you dumb fools cause a mercenary and money grubber is what he is. The only things he really cares for other stuff are just a bunch of bullshit.

Hahah this news proves what everyone who was upset about Sunday were right on, lol

All his excuses have been exposed, lol

It must be so hard for 'super frank' to be forced to stay at City and get loads of money, lol

Normally, I would agree with you bro. But that's the only way to get rid of my frustration somehow. I don't want to be raging around and cursing on the forum.
I don't really have that big problem with him being a player of City. Really.
What really disappoints me how he is taking every Chelsea fan for a fool and believes, everyone would believe his lies. He really thinks that I think he was forced into the City contract? That he didn't expect to come on and score against us? That he would refuse to play against Chelsea?
Yeah, fat Frank. You are a victim of your contract, They forcefully sent you to Manchester. Poor you. Why didn't you consult a lawyer to defend your rights? Oh well, money rules the world. Especially, when you can wander around and do everything and still be called a legend.
It's not him in the City shirt pissing me off. I don't believe in loyalty in football anyway. It's his continous use of lies!
I don't expect much from someone who spent so many years at a club and leaves. I just expect one thing and I don't think that's too much to be asked for: Honesty

Lmao, extending his loan deal?
I love how the excuses for his continuation at City are running dry. First it was so he could prolong his international career.. Oh but wait, he retired from England duty! So then came "well he still needs to train at the top level", train? Well he could 'train' with Chelsea could he not? Oh but that's right, he was made too because NYFC are affiliates of City... Yes, because clearly Frank had no free-will and was a slave to his contract wasn't he?
So then we go back to the most basic argument used.. He was only there to keep fit until the end of Jan and then link up with his future team-mates. BUT WAIT, now he's going to stay until February, the month where we entertain City at Stamford Bridge? And a month prior to the MLS season starting?
Give me strength

Funny to see that everything I wrote about him and got booed for turns out to be true
Face the truth:
Name: Frank Lampard
Club: Manchester City
Coach: Manuel Pellegrini
Overall feeling: Happy with the club, the coach and the goal in the previous match.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2766484/Frank-Lampard-stay-Manchester-City-January-reveals-manager-Manuel-Pellegrini.html
Frank to extend playing period to include a return to SB. So much for loyalty. lol

NYC did not exist, Lampard signed with Man-City corp, he's not an idiot.. he knows how to read contracts, he will have known the minute he signed the deal. And that doesn't excuse the fact he said he wouldn't play against us, when it was declared.
Completely different to the Batitusta situation, unless you have quotes and promises from him similar to what Lamps said.

I don't want anyone to be 'warned', I just want people to challenge an opposing argument, rather than skip around it with insults.
My stance grew stronger on this subject, when I realised nobody has a good counter. Other than tripe about 'real' fans and being 'professional', like's he's a slave who was forced to sign for the City family and a team that doesn't exist yet.
Frank Lampard is a wolf in John Terry clothing.

What does being a "top professional" have anything to do with being Chelsea's GOAT? I'm yet to see any argument in favor of that "top professional" statement I've come across dozens of times since yesterday, yet people talk about him being a top professional all the time.
As far as I'm concerned, I'd rather Lampard behaved like the biggest unprofessional ever in the game of football if it meant him bleeding blue, but he didn't. He [a] signed a contract that included a loan clause sending him to City, Chelsea's biggest title rivals in the PL, he came on the pitch vs Chelsea, and [c] then he scored vs Chelsea.
So again I ask what's the correlation between being a top professional and Chelsea's GOAT?
Doing a, b, and c is being a professional.
Refusing to sign that contract as long as the clause is part of it, refusing to play and even threatening Pellegrini to score an own goal if he used him vs Chelsea, and sitting down on the pitch after being subbed on vs Chelsea is bleeding blue.
Yes, Lampard is a top professional but we shall forget never that day he betrayed the Chelsea family, 21.09.2014.

Exactly you have been very fair, honest and civilised in your response and I have tried to do that also. We both share hugely different opinions to many people here, it doesn't mean we are wrong. We just feel differently about Franks decisions. That is all.

I'll give my two cents to this discussions.
What Lampard has done is NOT okay, in my books at least. I'm not calling him a traitor or judas, but he is playing for our title rivals and even directly influenced the title race against us. He willingly and knowingly contributed FOR our rivals. I have a feeling many people choose not to let that sink in. Granted, he is a top professional, I'll give him that, but it doesn't make what he did right for me. There may be several reasonable justifications for his decisions and actions, but I don't care, it is still wrong on all levels.
Lampsy is a legend over here, no questioning that, and I might be able to forgive him because out of all the footballers, he's my all-time favourite. I will forgive him, because he's given us far more than he's taken. But I will never forget 21.09.2014 - the day he scored against us, the day John Terry had to block his shot, the day he made us feel miserable.
Also a big fuck you to Pellegrini, prick.

I need to be careful what I say because If I mention the word J***s it will get deleted again, what's the latin word for it?, maybe Frank will know.
But yes, there is no good reason for him joining City, some people live by morals or at least have some form of code they live by.. their values etc. I thought he was in the same mould as John Terry, i.e.. he had an affinity with the club and would make post-chels career moves with that in mind. Actions speak louder than words however, I don't care what he said in his press interviews because words have little weight. Speaking of words though, he not only said he wouldn't "join another english club", he also said he would refuse to play against us. He knew exactly what he was getting himself into when he joined a club owned by City that didn't exist yet, he's not a hostage.
When the AVB incident died down, we all had the Men In Black neuralizer treatment and flashed it away; Frank is a wolf in John Terry clothing.

And now he's a murderer too..
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/401056/Chelsea-fan-dead-Manchester-City-Frank-Lampard
R.I.P

(PS: Notice the bus-shaped alarm/night-light )