Jase

Sky are backtracking now. 🤣

In the same article, Palace are also looking to get Gallagher but on loan instead.

I meant valuing the player for XXX amount and then offer the remaining in cash. I mean, if the club could say 100 million immediately, I highly doubt the remaining 50 million is a problem. Am sure the club would try to get Dortmund to lower their price.

His move to Arsenal has sure gone down very well...

Even if that story was true, I doubt the club even offered that amount of cash to start with.

Well, this has come out of the blue...

That's assuming it's even true considering it's Sky... The Sky report said we offered one or the other, not both. EDIT: England's Sky said Abraham OR CHO while Germany's Sky said both. Go figure...

The update is that there is no update. Fjortoft was on Romano's show and all he apparently said was basically what we already know for ages - the club are interested in Haaland but there's no agreement etc. all comes down to whether the club can put in a bid big enough to make Dortmund sell him.

What about Drinkwater? 👀

Our pre-season friendlies so far: July 17 - Peterborough (behind closed doors) July 22 - TBC July 27 - Bournemouth (on Chelsea TV) August 1 - Arsenal August 5 - Tottenham (on Chelsea TV)

Our pre-season friendlies so far: July 17 - Peterborough (behind closed doors) July 27 - Bournemouth August 1 - Arsenal August 5 - Tottenham (on Chelsea TV)

Unless it's a loan, which I'm not sure that the club are willing to accept it, West Ham supposedly can't even afford £30 million for Lingard. So, not sure how they will afford to pay the £40 million for Abraham. Matt Law has also previously said that West Ham don't have a lot of money now and they need to sell to buy.

Falk is just taking the piss at this point. Now that the Euros is over, these journalists, the media are using us to get clicks and views by recycling the same old BS every day.

If people love their Fjortoft updates, here's him talking about Haaland on ESPN last night. Still ifs, buts, maybes...

No Rice, no deal.

What SJ above was referring to...