Fernando
Everything posted by Fernando
-
Another brexit event . People are tired of the establishment even though Trump ain't the best, but that's what you get when you have such two candidates .
-
She will win PA , the others one are tough .
-
Clinton still has a chance . It's not over yet . What a crazy race !
-
Yeah I'm surprised , the stock market is already down big !
- 15,924 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
When I went to vote you can write in your own candidate. That's at least worth doing if you don't want to vote for the other 2....even though Gary Jonhson was there as well.
-
I just voted for Trump but I fully expect Clinton to win. It will be a shock to me if Trump wins. But if the shock happen, I hope you profit well my friend. Because markets don't like surprise and you get the biggest move.
- 15,924 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
A very interesting prospect.
-
Well that being said, I'm going to say screw it. I'm going to vote for Trump. I rather get screw right away and be done with it then a slow painful bleed with Clinton.
- 15,924 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- governments
- laws of countries
- (and 1 more)
-
Dave is a beast, I wouldn't trade him. Only Cahill I want upgrade.
-
I'm a Republican and usually vote Republican but the only issue with Trump that I can foresee is that the country will be split eventually. A lot of riots and all that shenanigans. What's worse is that since hes a very business astute mind he will start cutting stuff. And when he starts cutting the wrong thing like government support ie Welfare, Food stamps and such then everything comes crashing down. I think this is the risk I foresee with Trump. Clinton a hypocrite and liar will just bring us a false peace. A false sense of security for when things are falling apart internally. So either way we are screw! Do we get screw right away with Trump? Or get screw slowly by Clinton? You pick!
-
He might be better when we upgrade cahill . Granted cahill has done great but we can do better .
-
Of course we will spend big if we win the PL. A lot of money from the PL and back into the CL.
-
The same I'm a big fan. Would be perfect for this system as he's fast and has good link up play. Think he will have a better link up with Hazard then Costa has with Hazard.
-
I still have some hope for this guy . We shall see if next season Conte gives him some time .
-
Please go back for radja .
-
Yeah you need a good blend. I definitely agree on spending big on younger players, but its not good to have a team stack of younger players. You need to have your more established/older player here and there. A good balanced is needed. And Yes Payet plays in Hazard position, but Hazard is more flexible me thinks. Payet to me is the upgrade to Oscar, not really Pedro. Pedro an upgrade would be A. Sanchez but that's impossible. So I would happily take someone like Di Maria.
-
What I see is that while Mourinho and Pep sees as the main answer is to buy and buy, Klopp and Conte are to work work work. You see the difference the former and latter have had an effect on what they have. Granted they all need to buy but not to the excessiveness Mourinho and Pep always required.
-
True but I think Payet is a late bloomer ala Drogba. If he can have 3 good seasons that's totally worth it. And hey if we can't get Griezman till two years from now, then Payet would be a good stop gap till then.
-
Because he's a limited player. I said the same thing about Willian and people was like selling him in the summer was dumb and all this stuff....really? When a player peeks and you can upgrade you do it. I remember when Malouda had that amazing season with Carlo title run, that was his peek and it was time to sell. But no we kept him and end up leaving on a free..... Players like Malouda, Willian, Pedro are limited and when they hit their peek you should look to upgrade.
-
I think that was more down to their board being cheap. Remember he left Juventus because of this with the board. Thank god our board ain't like that, and one thing I agree with Conte is that is better to spend much more on younger players with much more potential as they will last a long time. Like say we spend a lot on Verrati, that would be worth it because hes young and has plenty of potential. Juventus was not able to do that, here at Chelsea Conte will be able to do that because the board has no problem with that.....they do get a little stingy when it comes to older players with higher price as we saw with Radja. But young players with potential like we saw with Bats, they put the money down!
-
I think that is what was needed, someone to build a team. Managers like Allegri we had, caretakers like Hiddink. Carlo, RDM, Benitez etc etc. Since Mourinho Mark 1 we have not had a manager to build a team. We are finally seeing that with Conte that no one was able to do since a decade ago. Mourinho tried his second time but failed miserable. Conte everything looks good, and what's better Roman has been waiting for this moment. To have a manager that is able to coach good attacking style as well defensive. He finally got his man, and I'm sure Roman will back him with all the money he can give him.
-
That would great if true. But I take those with a pinch of salt. Action is more important then words and we will know this is true if in January transfer window there's some good spending done.
-
Seems like he don't like Allegri as to compare to Conte. I remember when we was discussing the Conte or Allegri thing most people mentioned that it was Conte that build the team. Allegri was like just showing up after everything was put into place.
-
Payet might want to leave from west ham . . . . .
-
Dimitri Payet hints at January exit from West Ham http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11685/10647913/dimitri-payet-hints-at-january-exit-from-west-ham
