Fernando

Because if you control the mid you win the game and as well that helps the defense. I actually think the mid is the most important. Pep biggest achievement have been from a midfield that controls everything.

So I put this question in the match thread but I guess I stumble upon my answer. The reason why we have improve so much in set piece is because of this one man it seems: Bernardo Cueva. Here's a good article about him: Bernardo Cueva: Chelsea’s New Set-Piece Coach March 25, 2024 Transfer Analysis The summer 2024 transfer window doesn’t open for another three months, and yet, Chelsea have already completing their first signing of the window: Brentford set-piece coach Bernardo Cueva. Who is Bernando Cueva? Born in 1987, Cueva played street football as a child but did not pursue a professional playing career; instead, he got his start as an analyst for Mexican side Chivas, working alongside manager Matías Almeyda as they won the 2017 Clausura league title and the 2017 Clausura Copa MX as well as the 2018 CONCACAF Champions League, which sealed their participation in the FIFA Club World Cup. After three years at Chivas, he made the trip across the Atlantic and joined Brentford as an analyst in 2020. 2021 would see Brentford earn promotion to the top-flight for the first time in 75 years, with Cueva becoming the first Mexican to be part of the coaching staff of a Premier League side, and it also saw him appointed as the set-piece coach of the Norway national team, only working with Norway during international breaks. Moreover, he also works as one of the advisors for Mexico manager Jaime Lozano. Today, however, Cueva is approaching a new adventure at Stamford Bridge. Chelsea had pinpointed Cueva as their leading candidate for a position that had remained vacant since Anthony Barry’s departure for Bayern Munich in April 2023. The 36-year-old analyst will swap one West London club for another and make the move from Brentford to Chelsea after the completion of the 2023/24 season. Cueva is yet another Brentford technical analyst to be poached by another team after Nicolas Jover and Jack Wilson (Manchester City), Andreas Georgson (Arsenal) and Gianni Vio (Italy and Tottenham Hotspur), and he looks set to earn the Bees a healthy profit with Chelsea £750,000 in compensation. What is a Set-Piece Coach? A set-piece coach concentrates on player development by designing drills to facilitate learning new routines, refining ball delivery techniques, and instructing on spatial awareness within the box. A set-piece coach also plays a pivotal role in a team strategy: Set-piece coaches help in strategizing the team’s tactics as well as optimizing scoring opportunities from set-piece situations such as corners free kicks, and throw-ins. Their responsibilities extend beyond merely teaching players routines and techniques; they meticulously analyze opponents’ weaknesses and devise innovative set-piece strategies to exploit them effectively. Set-piece coaches collaborate closely with the manager and the rest of the coaching staff to integrate set-piece plays seamlessly into the overall game plan. They also work individually with players to enhance their technical proficiency in delivering the ball and positioning themselves for optimal scoring chances. Set-piece coaches continuously evaluate and refine set-piece strategies based on scouting reports, match analysis, and evolving tactical trends in the game. Their attention to detail and strategic acumen are instrumental in maximizing a team’s scoring potential and gaining a competitive edge on the field. How can a Set-piece Coach be Beneficial to Chelsea? Whilst Brentford have regressed into a relegation battle this season, they have generally been able to punch above their weight since earning promotion to the Premier League in 2021, and one of the biggest reasons behind their success is their impressive efficiency in set-piece positions. Chelsea, on the other hand, have struggled from dead ball scenarios since Frank Lampard’s first spell in charge. In his first season as Brentford’s set-piece coach, he has been able to achieve success both in terms of attacking dead balls as well as defending them. Probability of Scoring: The xG value represents the probability, on a scale from 0 to 1, of a goal being scored from a particular set-piece situation. In this case, an xG of 0.46 suggests that there’s nearly a 46% chance of a goal being scored from a typical set-piece opportunity. Comparative Analysis: By comparing xG values across different matches, teams, or seasons, one can evaluate the relative strength of a team’s set-piece execution. For instance, if a team consistently achieves xG values above 0.46 for set-piece opportunities, it suggests they have a particularly potent set-piece strategy. Brentford have an average xG of 0.46 from set-pieces, giving them roughly a 50% chance of scoring from every opportunity they create. On the other hand, Chelsea have an xG of just 0.20, indicating that they are less clinical in front of goal and/or that they create fewer high-quality scoring chances from set-pieces. It is clear to see that Chelsea hiring a set piece coach is beneficial to them in terms of: Increased Goal-Scoring Opportunities: A well-executed set piece can create high-quality scoring opportunities, often resulting in goals. By refining their set-piece routines, the team can increase their chances of converting set-piece situations into goals, thus raising their overall xG value. Diversification of Attack: Set pieces offer a different avenue for goal-scoring compared to open play. By investing in set-piece strategies, the team can diversify their attacking options, making them less predictable for opposing defenses and potentially increasing their overall offensive effectiveness. Exploitation of Height and Strength: Set-piece situations often involve aerial duels and physical battles in the penalty area. If the team has tall or physically imposing players, improving set-piece execution can allow them to capitalize on their strengths and create more goal-scoring opportunities from headers or rebounds Strategic Advantage: A team that excels in set pieces can gain a strategic advantage over opponents, especially in tightly contested matches where goals are hard to come by. By consistently threatening from set pieces, they can put pressure on the opposing defense and force them to commit resources to defending against set pieces, potentially opening up space for other attacking opportunities. A tactical statistician who is not only responsible for designing set-piece plays, but giving instructions to his players, Cueva is the latest example of Chelsea’s recent venture into data-driven analysis. He looks set to have a multidimensional role at Chelsea that includes: Analyzing opponents’ tactical setups, as he was once an analyst for Chivas. Working with the manager on issues regarding tactical setups and setups used during corners. Cueva’s background in both analysis and tactical coaching positions him well to bridge the gap between data-driven insights and on-field implementation. With his experience in analyzing opponents’ tactical setups, Cueva could play a vital role in pre-match preparation, helping the team anticipate and counter the strategies of their adversaries. Cueva’s involvement in set-piece planning underscores the increasing importance of data-driven approaches in optimizing scoring opportunities, whether through corner kicks, free kicks, or other set-piece situations. As the use of data analytics becomes more prevalent in football, Cueva’s role at Chelsea could evolve to encompass a broader range of responsibilities, including player performance analysis, recruitment strategies, and even in-game decision-making support for the coaching staff. By leveraging Cueva’s expertise and the broader trend toward data-driven decision-making in football, Chelsea could gain a competitive advantage both on and off the pitch. By: @Kadmiel_09 https://breakingthelines.com/transfer-analysis/bernardo-cueva-chelseas-new-set-piece-coach/

By the way anyone cared to give some good analysis why we have improve in set piece this season? Is it because of Bernardo Cueva?

Appartently we are riviling city for Elliot Anderson? Interesting if true. That means we will sell Lavia? As Lavia is really amazing when fit but he is eternially injured.

Apparently Hamas executing people on the streets. I guess Hamas won't dissarm and this peace plan won't hold.

Then you will be the first one critizie him when he gets outsmuscle and make a mistake in a defense which he alsmot did against Liverpool. No thanks better for him to take it slow like Maresca is doing.

That is true and I feel the same. Trump just push this so he can look good. And the fact is that the world don't care if he looks good. But that being said the most important thing for the people of Israel was to get the hostage back. Something that I asked in the past how in the world they and Hamas alive if Gaza was starving? Could it be that Hamas always took the food from its people?

Did someone said Murillo? 🥳

CEASEFIRE DEAL: A ceasefire in Gaza came into effect at 12 p.m. local time (5 a.m. ET), the Israeli military said, after Israel's government approved the first phase of a deal intended to bring the war to an end. HOSTAGES RELEASED: Trump said he expects Israeli hostages to be released Monday or Tuesday in an exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Forty-eight hostages remain to be returned, 20 of whom Israel says it believes are still alive. TRUMP TO EGYPT: Trump said he plans to travel to Egypt for an official signing ceremony. TROOP DEPLOYMENT: The U.S. military is preparing options to deploy as many as 200 U.S. troops to Israel to support stabilization in Gaza and the flow of humanitarian aid and security assistance into the enclave, two U.S. officials familiar with the planning said. AID FOR GAZA: Aid is expected to flow into Gaza, where scenes of devastation and hunger, as well as a famine declaration, have prompted outrage around the world and left Israel isolated diplomatically.

I'm actually more happy with this. This constant VAR has done some harm. I always wanted the option to appeal to technology as well to give only a finite amount to appeal those making it more tactical when to use. I'm okay with 2 for now, maybe 3 per match. That way the Ref or VAR don't stop the game every time, but it would be the affected club and they would used it wisely as they only have a finite opportunity. I'm much better with this.

FIFA to trial 'simplified VAR' at U20 World Cup FIFA is employing an alternative review system that allows coaches to appeal two referee's decisions per match at the Under-20 World Cup in Chile. The football video support (FVS) is a "simplified version" of VAR and has transformed the youth tournament into a testing ground for new technologies. Unlike VAR, which uses special cameras and a supporting team of officials, FVS referees review their decisions based on images captured by the television broadcast, without further assistance. According to FIFA, the FVS system aims to "democratise football by introducing video review technology as a complementary option," not only for top-level competitions but also for those that "could not afford VAR infrastructure," thanks to its low cost and simplified operation. Coaches can only appeal in four specific situations: whether or not there was a goal; whether or not there was a penalty, over a direct red card, or in case of suspicion that a card was not shown to the correct offender. The system had already been tested by FIFA in other competitions, such as the 2024 Youth Championship/Blue Stars in Switzerland and the 2024 Under-20 Women's World Cup in C

And as well Contract expires: Jun 30, 2033. If he has not signed a new contract by 2029 we can sell in 2030 that's a nice 5 years of use of him plus potential value we will get in 5 years time.

What happens if Strousburg make it to the CL? Right now they are in that spot granted it's early in the season.... They also play PSG on Friday October 17.

Uefa gives ‘reluctant’ approval for domestic games to be played abroad this season Governing body says go-ahead shouldn’t set precedent Barcelona poised to play in US, and Milan in Australiahttps://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/oct/06/uefa-approval-domestic-games-to-be-played-abroad

So any hope of Hamas and Israel war coming to conclusion this week? Or will it drag on? And after the war is finish a lot of people in Israel goverment should be trial, as many committed big war crimes.

Why you putting words on someone. Have you seen anyone protest on the streets about this recently? The ones that where enrage recently where the left that took to the street when the wade abortion was overthrown. And as you tipically do you think the right is the authoritarians all the time when the same happens with your leftist. To me they are both of the same coin. They each try to play the high moral ground when in truth they each try to force you to believe their ideologies.

I agree with the Dissenting Opinions. I wonder if they bring it up now with a larger conservative judges if they would change it. I'm in favor of changing this.

United States v. Eichman (1990) was a Supreme Court case that struck down the Flag Protection Act of 1989, a federal law that criminalized flag desecration. The Court ruled 5-4 that the Act violated the First Amendment's guarantee of free expression, finding that the government's interest in protecting the flag was related to the suppression of free expression and the content of that expression. This decision reaffirmed the Court's earlier ruling in Texas v. Johnson (1989), which also found flag burning to be a protected form of symbolic speech. Background The Flag Protection Act of 1989: In response to the Texas v. Johnson decision, Congress passed the Flag Protection Act, which made it illegal to destroy or deface an American flag. The Protests: The case involved individuals who burned U.S. flags on the steps of the U.S. Capitol to protest government policies. The Supreme Court's Decision First Amendment Violation: The Court found that the Flag Protection Act was unconstitutional because it infringed on the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Content-Based Regulation: The Court determined that the government's interest in protecting the flag was directly related to the suppression of expression and the content of that expression. Strict Scrutiny: Because the law was a content-based restriction on speech, it had to be subjected to strict scrutiny, a high legal standard that the government could not meet. Reaffirmation of Texas v. Johnson: The Court's decision in Eichman essentially reaffirmed its holding in Texas v. Johnson, confirming that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. Dissenting Opinions Justices William H. Rehnquist, Byron R. White, John Paul Stevens, and Sandra Day O'Connor dissented, arguing that the law did not truly infringe on First Amendment rights and that there were many other ways for demonstrators to exercise their rights.

Not sure. He did good but I thought he was a bit bad when coming to the press and help with defense. Some he help at other he was a bit of a worry for me. I don't think he is ready for the league yet and we should use him as a sub for now.

Well we will have to wait and see if the supreme court ever decides to take up that matter with the input of Trump and company because as you alluded they make the law.

Nope I gave my opinion of why it should be illegal to burn the flag. But if the supreme court has a ruling then there's nothing we can do, and if Trump does it now he is breaking the law. I agree with what he said but he would need it to bring to the court to me modified. Just like they did with abortion.

Well I gave you my opinion. Now as you stated the law says your allowed to do it so I will agree with you then that it's unlawful to arrest someone right now because of this. You can't do it because we have a ruling against it. If trump and company wants to be serious then they should push it to the Supreme Court to consider this, in which I'm in favor of.

So basically what I'm saying, the law it's the law and there's nothing I can do at this moment but I can voice my opinion on not agreeing with it. As people do with this recent ruling: The most significant recent Supreme Court ruling on abortion was the June 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade and determined that the U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to abortion. This decision eliminated the federal constitutional standard for abortion access, allowing individual states to set their own abortion policies, which has resulted in some states banning or severely restricting abortion.

So your in favor to use the Supreme Court ruling when it's in your favor? But when they strike down abortion it's wrong? Consistency is the issue here. Hence the people have the right to question that, because that is freedom of speech. Just like I'm questioning this law and if it should be changed. I'm giving my opinion and why I'm in favor of this being reformed like they just did with me abortion. And Trump is not king for me, I don't agree with many things he does i have said it here. But in this matter I agree and I give my opinion why I believe like that.

Using the Supreme Court does not win your argument as I can still not agree with them. Example the supreme court rule against the abortion and many people don't agree and voice their opinion. Burning a flag is a political speech I agree but not in the country your in. Example I'm against Maduro and I live in Venezuela. This doesn't give me the right to burn the flag in the country of Venezuela. I'm outside sure whatever. But in your country no I don't agree.