didierforever

jose said "lukaku should say why he is at everton and not chelsea" that means "lukaku put in a transfer request". so when jose said he wants hazard to be better next season, did he mean hazard put in a trasnfer request. when jose said oscar was poor in the 2nd half of the season, that definitely HAD to mean he put ina transfer request what maybe everyone at the club out ina trasnfer request!!!! LUKAKU is a talent, right? so what has changed now? after the summer trasnfer window we had a winter window, in which we could have made a negotiation with other clubs about lukaku. infact since we have already sold luiz, why have not we done that with lukaku? is it because our manager STILL wants him at the club. so, jose is thinking about keeping a player at the club who asked for a transfer.... WEIRD!!!!

remember when sturridge had said that he can be a 20 goal a season striker if given a chance to prove himself. yet we thought he was all talk and no play. and now a player saying, "we have options like torres, ba and costa, so i may have to leave", is a player who is supposedly tooting his own horn!!! :lol:

is it the same sky sports that reported cavani, hulk,falcao were joining chelsea. based everything on one articles. dont think jose said lukaku wanted a "transfer". if he had said he wanted a transfer, why dint our manager sell him? oh probably cos he though lukaku has a future with the club!!! has that changed cos of his performances this season? i dont think so? so if our manger jose mourinho did think that this club was better off without LUKAKU, why dint he sell him? maybe u r wrong then? is not that easy to explain even if u look at it your way!!! wasnot our captain and legend JT, going to go to CITY before he signed a new deal. should not he be ridiculed!!!

Romelu Lukaku has admitted he may have to leave Chelsea this summer amid speculation the club are closing in on Diego Costa a massive difference between saying he wants to leave and he may have to club. he said"chelsea buy a lot of player every window. there are ba, torres and costa, so i may be leaving." then he goes on to say that he already has talked to the club. what wrong did he say exactly?

he asked for a transfer? when? 3 days after saying that he wants to stay at the club he loves. how is it that one thing gets all your attention and the other does not. plsu did he even ask for a transfer? costa has proven nothing in a chelsea shirt. dont buy him!!! lukaku already had proven it to the coaches in the pre-season. if 2 months were not good enough to change their mind, what was? he was not willing to wait around, sitting with the reserves waiting for torres, ba and etoo to fail and then be given a chance meanwhile destroying his WC dreams. the badge means a lot more to me too. and hence i am supporting him. the saddest part is, u dont have anything against him except for this one instance? like i said SO BLOODY WHAT? so what if he asked? he is still our best striker!!!! its your arrogance to not support a certain player cos he supposedly "hurt your feelings" or something that is making u go against him rather than any logical reasoning.

why the fuck would they buy neymar for 86.2 mil. why the fuck would they pay the taxes if they actually dint buy neymar for that amount. why the fuck would they even buy neymar when the whole world knew they needed a CB first. why the fuck would we buy torres for 50mil. why the fuck would we sell sturridge and keep torres even after 2 years of shit from him? i dont know WHY? thats what is "reported". by MANY tabloids. i have already given a link, so fucking read them.

injury prone bullshit? we are talking about romeu right? 2012-13 he gets to play 5/6 matches under FSW, gets injured. 2013-14 he gets to play 5 consecutive matches at valencia, gets injured. i mean romeu "apparently" missed 13 matches this season for valencia cos of injury playing a total of 1300 minutes. in 2011-12 he played a total of 485 minutes and missed half a season. BUT this guy definitely is not injury prone. he is such a good player that a valencia team finishing 8th in the la liga barely played him. talk about exagerating our players' prowess. he is 22 years old and has never played more than 5 games without getting injured.plus most of the la liga clubs are in a bad shape financially. look at ATM and u will get a clue. how is he a low risk signing for them. if ATM signed him for 5mil euros, he would cost more than the average of their team that beat chelsea at the bridge. lets wait and watch if la liga teams would actually LINE UP for his signature.

oh dear god!!!! fine, a 20 year lukaku, wanting to play at the biggest stage and competition in the world, got selfish and "asked for a loan move" so????? what the FUCK is the point here? he proved that he is better than the 3 idiots we had got!!! he has proven that he is one of the best young players around. but we should sell him off cos he dared ask for a loan move when there were already 3 other strikers in the club. brilliant!!!! i mean talk about fixating on one point!!!! again, so what if he asked for a loan? so bloody what? do we have another 21 year old striker who has scored 30 league goals in the last 2 seasons? NO. do we have a striker who has scored 30 league goals in the PL in the last 2 seaons? NO. have all our strikers COMBINED. YES. all of them COMBINED have scored exactly 30 goals which is 2 less than what lukaku ALONE has. also why the hell are people even replying to "lukaku asked for a loan. OMG, lets kill him." let them be!!!

maybe then. but since thats a barca forum we would get only a certain point of view. i have yet to read any site that has said 50% on the "profits". ALL of them say 50% of the fee.

infact that was my reason for clubs not to buy him. their wont be many clubs fighting it out for an injury prone, 1 year left on his contract, "decent" player. we will "try" to sell him off but doubt that would happen. probably he will end up on loan just to get his wages off our books.

most of the "sites" and "sources" report it as 50% of the transfer fee!!!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/arsenal/8703312/Arsenals-sense-of-loss-from-Cesc-Fabregas-departure-softened-by-clauses-in-his-Barcelona-contract.html http://www.givemesport.com/170332-buyback-clause-added-to-arsenal-40m-playmaker-deal

probably a loan. just one year left on his contract. dont think clubs would want to waste millions when they can get him for fee next season.

is it true that arsenal will get half of fiberglass' transfr fee??? i dont know what the reality of this is but one of my friends (arsenal fan) said this could happen Why Arsenal have refused to active the buy-back option? When we sold Cesc to Barca for £36 million we inserted 2 clauses. First one was buy back option. Second 50% sell of player and last one was if Barcelona win Champions league Arsenal will get another 1.5 million. Which won’t happen now. Now I’ll come to main point. Why Arsenal have refused to active buy-back option? I’ll tell you why but first lets go through second clause. If Arsenal don’t want to sign player Barcelona will sell to other club and there are numbers of clubs are chasing Cesc. Currently as we heard Chelsea are leading to sign Cesc and we also heard Chelsea have made bid around £33 million.if Barca decide to sell Fabregas to Chelsea, Arsenal will get 50% of £33 million that’ll be £16.5 million. Personally I don’t see Barcelona selling Cesc for 16.5 they are waiting for Arsenal to make bid which Arsenal won’t. Now here is what I think will happen. Arsenal definitely wants to sign Fabregas but not for £33 million. Arsenal are waiting for Barcelona to accept offer from any club.Then Arsenal will make last minute ditch offer which will be more than what Barcelona are getting for example if Barca decide to sell player for £33 million. Barca will get £16.5 million and then Arsenal might try for around 18-20 million. Barca won’t have any choice but to sell Cesc to Arsenal any idea about this?

and here we start with the "arrogant" talk. so was sturridge, right? how is that treating us!!!! also, he just scored a hat-trick in the last match i think for belgium. so really, i think he is concentrating on the WC as much as he should.

LUKAKU - "I had trouble shitting yesterday, so i think i will leave CFC" (#sarcasticmail - for idiots who believe everything they read on the internet)

a perfect analysis of his time at barca!!!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2306352/Chelsea-sign-Brazilian-woman-play-FA-WSL--Ester-Aparecida-dos-Santos.html thanks....

who are the original 4?

32 of his goals have come in PL in 74 appearances. a very good return for any striker. he is the 3rd highest goal scorer in PL in the last 2 seasons. or rather in terms of minutes, he has played 4766 minutes to score his 32 goals which is 149 minutes per goal (which includes his 10 appearances for chelsea too) rooney's 44 goals in PL came in 132 appeareances. 2002-03 :1610 2003-04: 2442 2004-05: 2182 2005-06: 3072 an overall of 9306 minutes for 42 goals (since his last 2 goals may have come in 06-07 season where he turned 21) at an average of 221 minutes per goal. the stat even for PL is as good as it gets for romelu. for messi 2004-05 : 82 (1) 2005-06 : 909 (6) 2006-07 : 1995 (14) 2007-08 : 1998 (10) 2008-09: 2513 (23) which means a total of 54 goals in 7497 minutes at an average of 139 minutes per goal which is better than lukaku's 149 minutes per goal but since the comparision is with the world's best player, we can probably give him that leeway. lukaku has performed at every stage that he has been given. he has scored goals and played well whenever called upon. saying "most of his goals were in the belgian league" is a slap to his acheivement. ENJOY!!!!

what was wrong in what he said!!!!! at over-reaction...

link? provide a proper link to the video or the words he said.

atleast when i derail the thread, it is still with chelsea talk!!!! :lol:

hahahahha...

what the hell is happening here!!!