didierforever

could not agree more. whats worse is that ryan was not given a chance to prove himself.

lets hope its willian thru the center and cuadrado on the right while oscar gets whats coming to him for a looonnnnnngggg time.

what was his transfer fee? i thought it was 20mil.

mark -0 bertand - 10 luiz - 37 bruma - 2.5 cole - 0 essien - 0 lampard - 0 schurrle - 24 mata - 37 kdb - 17 lukaku - 28 total 155.5.

strikers - costa, remy, bamford (HG) AMs - hazard, cesc (HG), willian, cuadrado, thorgan, traore (HG) CM/DMs - matic, pogba(HG), rambo, mvg/romeu CBs - JT(HG), zouma, GC(HG), iva, luis, azpi, ake(HG), christensen(HG) GKs - courtois, new GK, beeney(HG). ins - pogba, new GK. outs - oscar, mikel, kakuta, marin, moses, piazon.

Idiotic from us.

Welcome!!!

Bye bye and good luck!!!! So much expectation and disappointment

Still nothing??? Is not the geeman transfer window over?

it wont. but considering it would be like barca's add ons which included a minimum number of matches for some sum + if they win so and so trophy then some sum, and considering how poor psg have been in ligue so far, i wont count on it.

it was quoted so but our recent breakdown on finances gives a different result. http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2015/1/12/7527747/chelsea-financial-accounts-ffp http://swissramble.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/chelsea-hey-hey-my-my-into-black.html

schurrle is 30 mil euros. luiz was "only" 37mil pounds.

hahhahah,,, nice.. in that case we should probably try a swap deal. hazard for valencia. would save us some money.

what? 21 mil pounds for enner valencia? when did this come to surface?

And then we can argue abiut the second leg where we played oscar in the no.10 role and should have been 2-0/3-0 down if not for courtois. Also your argument about costa getting frustrated with only him pressing was most visible in that match too where he dint get any support from oscar. Or for that matter the city match too. In which oscar's supposed defensive nuance was no where to be seen and his overall contribition to that match was as mich as mine or yours who were sitting at hone shouting at the TV while sipping beer. We can take soton as an example for this. Ankther gane where we had total control of the proceedings. Yes, we dint get the desired result, but cesc as the no.10 was great that day too.

But that is a "nothing" argument. Its like saying adel taraabt and ben arfa have a similar style of play as messi as they are all dribblers. And I think that is what robguima was trying to do. Taking the minutest similarity and exagearting it to the max.

Totally disagree with this. Cesc as a no.10 has been pretty impressive. His pressing is way better than oscar's. Our best away performance defensively woild have been stoke when cesc started as a no.10. Also, there is a massive difference with cesc and oscar. Oscar loses the ball, cesc doesn't. Or atleast not half as much as osvar. Oscar has to make it up with the extra running and workrate, which to be fair to him he does. With cesc we get a much better control of them and the number of turnovers making us so suspect to counters are less. So it just is not right to say that cesc would not be as good a no.10 as oscar cos oscar has a better stamina.

lampard's passing was immaculate, oscar cant make a 5 5yard passes perfectly. lampard's consistency was admirable. it was his biggest asset. did not he play every game under jose in one of the seasons in jose's first spell. not only that, 90% of lamps' performance were a 8/10 performance. oscar's best "performance" (like newcastle where he scored and assisted), barely makes a 8/10 performance. i know people are totally against lamps but comparing oscar to lamps is a blasphemy. ps - also please dont compare the insane goals and assists that lamps had in his career to the meagre "barely keeps me in the first team" goals and assists of oscar.

recal moses.

i love koke but no. pogba would be perfect and cesc as the no.10.

no i mean PL. jose will play his best team against RM in a semi final while playing the likes of schurrle and salah in PL and try to get a win. we wont sacrifice a chance to win CL in any way. and i dont expect the same 3 (hazard-oscar-schurrle) can or should be played all through the season.

so u want us to continue having oscar and willian in the first team starting every match while having a bench of schurrle and salah? we are going to have to play big big games in PL against the likes of psg, atm, rm, barca, bayern, should we start salah who could not make a positive impact against shrewsbury, to play in PL? is schurrle does not leave, we will not get cuadrado due to FFP. and the current pool of players is a disaster waiting to happen towards the end of the season.

we definitely will be the first to blink. i mean it would be stupid to jeapordise our PL chances for a couple of millions.

wenger has 1 win in his last 16 matches against top 4 sides. Wenger lost to united last season when chelsea, city, pool all did doubles on them. Wenger got ownrd by soton during his gung ho approach. Wenger got butt fucked by jose 6-0 last year. Wenger has not won against jose in 12 meetings. But I guess one win after years and years and years of crap nakes him the best manager ecer!!!

Bogey ground. Courtois Azpi zouma jt luis Rambo matic Willian cesc hazard Remy If cesc is not fit, then willian thru the center and cuadrado on the RW