spuz

Who's Calcio? My mate got me into Chelsea in the 80's. He had all the sticker books and used to teach me who the likes of Speedie and Dixon were. Even though I didn't like football back then,if any one at school asked my answer was Chelsea. Not very popular seeing as 99% back then supported Liverpool. Man U were virtually nobodies back in the 80's. At my schools anyway.

Whoever Torres was playing for at the time. No,I was kidding, of course I supported them then and way before Roman too.

Can be,just please not Anelka and Drogba out wide. If we get Sanchez and co. it would work much better. I didn't support them then. Infact under Jose it was more the 4-1-4-1 formation. Which I wouldn't mind seeing again. Sort of a 4-5-1 for away games,especially at the nou camp.

Mikel,Essien,Ramires,Josh,Lamps. If we're going to add to that then let's make it a top quality player with age on his side.

4-3-3 ?? Why,are we Barca or something.

The twat also had this to say: "A club like Manchester City change their philosophy every year and Chelsea spent about €80 million [£70m] this season ... two clubs who had a big mouth before the season, thinking that Arsenal wouldn't play a role in the title race, but we are still ahead of them. And just by playing our own game, through our own philosophy." When did we mouth off at the start of the season exactly? Bitter twat,just like the fans and manager. Is Whinger grooming him to be the next manager. Moaning and being a voyeur.

Scousers are closely related. Definately the 2 worse set of fans in this country.

Never happen. You'll always have scousers saying that Gerrard is better. Despite the stats in front of them,season after season. What's even funnier is scousers claiming Carragher is better than JT. Then there's the 'Scholes is England's greatest ever midfielder' brigade.

http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/arsenal-ace-van-persie-unimpressed-mouthy-barcelona-players-1527891 I would love to punch this twat one.

That's what I mean though,if he transferred would he have got a pay rise elsewhere? I think not going and looking for first team football is a mistake on his part. I can't fault the bloke though.

He's too old,let's sell him.

I dunno. I don't like seeing loyal and footballer in the same sentence. It's not like Barca or Real came in and offered to double his wages. Even JT and Lamps got a massive pay rise by staying 'loyal'.

Was that 'good post' supposed to be 'bad post'? Like Styles says he did alright but never spectacular in his first 2 seasons with us and that's about it. He's earnt alot of money since for not many appearances,he ain't done too bad at all.

No. I was being serious. And I can't believe you were being serious if that's the case.

Please tell me you forgot to put a smiley face at the end?

I think the club has served him better than he's served the club. He's not done too bad out of us.

I think he could have got 45 goals minimum. Doesn't matter anyway,he could have scored 100 goals and fat shrek would still be POTY.

That's probably the most stupid rule i've heard. In 2005,Scott Parker,Forsell and Cudicini didn't receive winners medals. I wonder if anybody has left a team that went on to be champions and received a winners medal ?

I've got a video that will wind you up like summats chronic. It does me anyway,just look at the main bloke and the gobshite woman in the background. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90B1yY6bgwE It annoys me and makes me laugh at the same time.

There's the key word right there. Support your team,which we all do. The manager is someone to be rated or not ,liked or not just like any player.

Could be worse,we could be playing them at home.

As long as that one game we don't win isn't the Man u game,and it's a draw not a defeat. Then yes I think we may well. If only they didn't fluke it against Bolton the other day.

But then if we don't praise him for winning,what would you call us then? Can we praise when someone is doing a good job and criticise and give an opinion when someone is doing a bad job?

Shut up you plastic glory hunter. I have to admit that Carlo has won me over slghtly in the past few weeks (more importantly he's won Roman over for the short term for now) It took him along time but he finally realised what was needed , however he is still learning and for a 51 yr old that's not good. e.g. Just this weekend when subbing Torres. And despite having umpteen amount of games this season the likes of Josh and co. have not seen much playing time. I'll stand by my views of we shouldn't have got him in the first place,it was a risk with him winning only 1 league title in 10 years with Milan and Juve. And I still stand by last season was very fortunate and we could have easily finished empty handed. So for the record if he wins us the CL and PL,I still have no worries about Roman getting rid or him leaving for Roma. We can find better (please no more Italians). Overall verdict: A lovely man,quiet and doesn't bring the dramas of Mourinho.Which I like. Never bad mouthed a ref,or blamed a linesman for a loss,unlike other poor loser managers. Still learning his trade. Doesn't give youth much of a chance. Takes a while to click on that something isn't working. Some very pointless subs for which I think he's finally realising. If he goes,I thank him and we move onwards and forwards,just like we have without Mourinho.

So he couldn't change formation before we got them 2 in January? We had 4 strikers and 4 central defenders before we signed them 2. I don't see whats changed.