nadavTKL

So you think that Hulk will stay there forever? Porto cant do it. They put this buy out clause so no one will even think of getting him.. But when Hulk will say he wants to go, Porto will obviesly listen to lower offers.

I meant take the 20 we want to spend on Alvaro, and put another 25, so its 45 on Hulk. But i can see why you didnt understood.. Belive me, i want Hulk in our team more than anyone i think... I realy like this player.

If they already spend 20 on Perreira, put another 25 and try to get Hulk :eyebrows: AVB should talk to him so Hulk would want to go... I know he has a release clause of 90m pounds or some, but Porto cant realy think they will get it..

I realy do think its that great, I prefer Kalou and Anelka to go. Malouda can still be a great super sub.

15m pounds its still okay.. hope that was realy our bid like Daily Mail are saying. But to be honest, i only care about Modric now... i belive Perreira can help us(maybe Boas wants him as our left winger and Mata to the right wing? could be), but Modric is the guy that we need mostly.

I can agree with that too. Nothing is close, but if this season we cant compete with City and United until the end(And im 99% belive we can), so its not the end of the world. You dont bring a manager like AVB for one amazing season, i want to belive that Roman got him to build something here. His football is different than Mou's and Carlo's, and we will have new players, so it can take some time. Still, like i said, im optimistic about us this season. But only if Modric will come.

Everyone shold agree with that i think, good post. Btw, have to ask if its a coincidence that this topic came right after United's 3-0 against spurs?

It cant get very deep with you, ah?

Ok, we all got that Lampard isnt in form and AVB said this and that....alright, but can you move on from that for just a second? What i said in my post is that even if Lampard is not in form, Ramires still doesnt show he's effective enough to be picked over him by Boas. So maybe AVB didnt act exactly like he said, but that's not a "Lie!!!" like your saying. For exemple, lets say that JT will play below is avrage, do you think that AVB will replace him in Ivanovic right away? no he wouldnt. So you can say that Lampard is not in form since he got back from his injury, but we all know that what happend in last season doesnt effect AVB decisions for this season. And i didnt talked only about what Lampard did this in the past and yati ya. Again, very childish from you to say that. We are not fighting, we are discussing about our team, i personally prefer to read your posts carfully and not to change them in the way i want.

So my post about Ramires doesnt make sense to you? :mellow: Again, I would love to hear your thoughts about it. Something more than "good player", "deserves to play", "Lampard dont".

Did you read my post? About Yossi, i think he didnt play him because he's about to go. Its pretty obvious i think.

i didnt understand this... And can you explain why am i wrong? its kinda seem childish to say: "He's good, and the other one isnt". just saying.

I dont think its a lie, if Remires will show he is such an effective midfielder for us, than he will play instead of Lampard. But he didnt show it yet. Yes, he contributes for us with great tackels here and there, and nice runs like one-two times in a game that speed up our game, but I cant see AVB preffer this player over Lampard, out of form as he will be. Ramires has to be more efficient and more dominant if he wants to be a starter over Lampard, becuase Lampard can still score his goals, and he's still our leader on the pitch together with JT. Its not that easy for a manager to bench a player like Lampard. Especially after what he gave us for all those years. Its very easy to bench Ramires in this situation. As much as i like his dynamic and energetic game, like i said, its just not enough. He got to be more dominante on the pitch, in the diffensive side or the attacking side. Or both, what will make him our new Essien like we said when he came. He isnt there right now...

I realy dont know how can you all be so blind, do you realy REALY think that Lampard will seat on the bench if Modric comes? Im not asking if you think he should be on the bench or not, im asking if you think thats what going happen. I see everyone writing that we are going to play Ramires instead of him... Its super obvious that we are going to play Lampard together with Modric, at least at the beginning of the season, until Lampard will play worse than now.

Thats wayyyy too much. Only two players should go imo.

I think everyone think like you on this one...

I think Malouda should stay for now, he's way better than Kalou and Anleka, and imo he can still deliver, at least from the bench . Im not sure about Sturridge either, so on one hand i still want to belive he can be a great first RW for us, but on the other hand im praying for the late late signing of Hulk... but i realy like this player so its not just because of Sturr.

Stoke City, away - Fernando Torres West Brom, home - Jose Bosingwa

Shittttt I finished to write a pretty long post, and than i pressed 'Back' on the wrong tab I wont write it all again, so the main points are those: (now i see that i wrote more than i wanted so forget about it...) *Ramires-Mikel-Modric isnt a huge change like we want from our mid. Luka is better than Lamps this days, but still he wont have enough help from Remires, who isnt contribute that much on the oppenent side. As for Mikel, we all know he dont contribute at all on this side, and sorry if i dont appreciate short passes on the middle of the field that much. * Ballack & Lampard, (Fit) Essien & Lampard, those were our last combinations, Modric & Ramires is not good enough and not creative enough. And lets not start to talk about the big games when we will play with 2 new young wingers, Torres, 2 young midfielders in their first-second season, and Mikel as our Boss. nah... you need some responsibility and expereince againt the giants of europe. * Lampard wont be dropped so fast, even if we realy want it, and even if my theory isnt true, so for "now"(Luka is still a Spud...) I think we need to see Lampard and Modric together. Maybe Lampard will be better when he's more free on the field.

I realy dont like him. I dont know who he was before his injury, but now he playes extermly slow, he isnt the type of player to play in the PL and especially not for what we are trying to do.

I read that a decision about this deal will be taking in the next 3 days. It hasn't fallen yet.

Thats exectly what I said all the time, it will be good for him to go, and we will be okay with that too. If you ask why we are selling Yossi and not Kalou, its because Yossi wants to go, Anelka and kalou dont(for now).

God we're so bad... Anleka, Mikel and Lampard were just awful.

Yes I can agree with that, if M&M will both come, it wont be that bad if Daniel will be just a bit better than Kalou(for example),

I actaully belive in Daniel, I think he has the speed, the dribble and the finish to play there, but overall, what reasons except those do we have so we could trust him as our STARTING right winger? He played like 3 games as a right winger in Chelsea, and most of them were against China stars or somthing like that.. In Bolton he played as a second striker, different roll. I actaully argued alot with someone(not from here) who said that Sturr just can't be a winger. The reasons he mentioned were that Daniel almost cant pass the ball to a friend, which is an exaggeration, but its kinda true, and he doesnt have the defensive responsebility to help to defend on the wing. Again, maybe true. I can trust him, but frankly I thought we are going to get a right winger, so Daniel would be a super sub. Now that we got a left winger(probably got..), there is a question over Sturr's ability to complete him. I think its fair. And please dont answer me with posts like "You prefer Kalouda?", cause no, im not prefer Kalouda, I only talk about our sqaud.