Henrique

That dude was a City supporter, wasnt him ?

We dont need none of them, because we already have Josh, who is only 17 and is already better than Kaká. But I would choose Fabregas, for sure, and I would buy Cavani, over Hamsik, if I had to choose one player from Napoli.

He is only 17. I know. I see lot of potential in this boy, but did you see what the guy said ? "Josh is way better than Kaká". How can a 17 years old boy can be better than Kaká ? Thats stupid. Im not downplaying him, Im just saying we have to be realistic, and dont expect too much of our youngster. Its just put pressure on him. I see in a post something like that "Kakuta is our answear to Messi". This is stupid, really stupid. I think its funny, because if you say that Kakuta is "Chelsea´s Messi", you only can expect him to destroy the opponents in important games, but when some supporters says he is not playing well, somebody will say "oh, he is only 18". Gimme a break, you say he is the new Messi, and now you are saying we have to pe patient. The guy say Josh is better than Kaká, and if he made some mistakes he will say that its because hes only 17, and we have to be patient. YOU must be patient, and think twice before posting this kind of madness: "Kakuta is the answear to Messi" and "Josh is better than Kaká". This is what piss me off, because with all the talk about the youngster, we end up paying stupid amount of money in a striker. This was a :goodpost:

Are you mad ? He is not even close yet, and if (thats a big IF) he turn into a world class player, Im not sure if he will player better than Kaka playerd in his best years. I dont understand why people are so fast in turnig young promisses in world class players. Just look what happend with Kakuta. Last season I have read lots of posts here that made the french look like the new big thing in football, the new Zidade, new Pelé. In this season we realised that he cant even play in the same level Kalou play.

There are people who easily fall in love with players. I don't care about Torres. Im only interested in what he does at Chelsea. So, if he want to leave in the summer, ok, give us the 50m we paid for him and let him go. Marseille want Drogba, ok, if the price is right for a 33 years striker, so thats fine.

Torrer will be worth 50 millions if he win 3 Premier League ( and play a decisive role in 3 seasons), if he help in a decisive way Chelsea to win at least 1 Champios League, and be named player of the year by FIFA, otherwise he wont be worth that. We paid half for Didier, and I doubt Torrer will be twice better than him.

In same way Torres is not worth 50m we paid for his services.

It doesnt matter If We will won the CL or not. Hes not great. Benitez also won a CL, is he great? Grant almost won it. If Terry had scored that penalty, would Grant be great ? NO !!!!!

Do you really believe that even if he win the CL the board will look for the right long-term manager ?

Guardiola renewed his contract until the end of next season, would be the perfect replacement when Carlo contracts expire.:eyebrows:

Im not always right, but in this case I am: Carlo is doing a poor job in this season, and is not the right man for the job, since he is avarage.

Yes I am!

What about playmaker? We do need one.

I only care about what Torres does on the pitch. I dont care about who he loves or If he listen Justin Bieber.

Yeah, people like you...

Unfortunately not as a manager, but as a replacement to Frank Arnesen. Full story here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1354687/Chelsea-want-Guus-Hiddink-help-Ancelotti.html Its also asserts that Roman intends to give Carlo another season...

People like you ?

I hope you know that it just doesnt make sense. When won the double last season because of him, now the "bad spell" is because of the players...:goodpost: This argument also dosent make sense: "you cant give the youngster too much responsabilty". It can be aplied to every young player in every big club in the world. Pedro started a World Cup final, because Torres was having a fucking awful tournament. If Carlo was the manager I bet Pedro wouldnt had started one single game. There is only one good argument to let Carlo stay until the end of his contract: the money we would pay to him.

Sacking in the summer will be cheaper: 6 millions. Only make sense sack him in the summer. Right now it wont help.

He is right, explaining his own weakness: its his job to find a solution to attack, he couldnt do that.

Sack a manager in the end of a season its not the same that sacking before that. I dont get these arguments "he won the double, this is just a bad spell". No, lot of fans now realize his wakness. BlueLion has exposed them in a recent post. Even in last season his weakness were there, but somehow We won the PL by one point. This is a bad spell caused by his mistakes. On the other side this argument that he is a manager "to win CL" is still ridiculous. Liverpool has also won one CL, but look where they are now: his biggest star asking to leave. Months ago when I said he should leave I was called a idiot, its funny that now people want him to stay not because they think he is good, but because they think we cant sack managers anymore.

Ancelotti contract is 6 millions a year. Its what will coast If We sack him in the summer. We sell Drogba or Anelka for that, then we wont lose money.

To sack now or in the summer?

Im sure the board wont give him "enough time". Roman didnt bought Torres to have another trophyless season. Im only worried about the money well have to pay If We sack him in the summer, otherwise he can go to hell with his stupid italian tatics. Bring some new manager with fresh ideas, please. This.