Jump to content

Vesper

Moderator
  • Posts

    67,907
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    940
  • Country

    Sweden

Everything posted by Vesper

  1. U21 team youth to sell or loan out Gabriel Slonina (looks another bust atm, was not at all good out on loan in the first half of the season) Teddy Sharman-Lowe Eddie Beach Ted Curd Dylan Williams Bashir Humphreys Leo Castledine Ishé Samuels-Smith Zak Sturge Richard Olise Sam Rak-Sakyi Alex Matos Kiano Dyer Charlie Webster Omari Kellyman Ato Ampah Shumaira Mheuka Jimmy-Jay Morgan Dujuan Whisper Richards
  2. I do NOT want him gone not at all
  3. £85m for Kudus is insane compared to
  4. they deffo want him perm, but cannot afford it they are like a mini-Barca, still in trouble over horrid huge money deals years ago
  5. 20m euros + 5m euros in add-ons is fair to both sides (he only has a year left on his contract and he turns 30yo in less than a month, on July 3rd) £16.8m + £4.2m £21m in toto
  6. 40m euros plus 5m euros in add ons is fair to both sides £33.7m + £4.2m £37.9m in toto
  7. Mike Maignan Interview notes with @NimaTavRood Pro’s : - Him and Donnarumma are the only keepers he’s seen who can make “impossible” saves which leave the ground stunned, there will be some games where you’re like “how the hell did he just do that” - Will allow Maresca to play with a higher defensive line - 1v1 is his best attribute - Strong cross claimer, he’s a very strong and active GK - Winning mentality and leadership is strong, Milan sources say it’s by far his best attribute - Brilliant with the ball at his feet, easily beats the press of teams, especially with long range passes - Bad season for Milan but has had big moments, especially against important teams such as Inter - Extremly fast for a goalkeeper, comes quick off his line - Good reader of play - Maignan is not another Onana, he’s a much better shot stopper Con’s : - concedes a lot down his bottom right corner, his main weaknesss - Gets random injuries on the pitch like finger injuries from colliding with players or players stepping on him - Form has been a bit inconsistent over the last 2 seasons, but Milan’s defence is shocking and it’s unclear whether it’s Maignan; defence or a bit of both Verdict : will be a great signing if he can stay fit and work out the structure and organisation with the defence, which is a big part of how good or not he can be because when he has confidence he’s amazing. Most of his mistakes are either his low right hand side weakness or mix ups with the Milan defence who aren’t good.
  8. €26m net per season deal until June 2027.
  9. EXCLUSIVE: Bruno Fernandes has REJECTED Al Hilal proposal. Despite crazy contract proposal from the Saudi Pro League club, Bruno Fernandes wants to continue playing football in Europe. Man United captain wants to play at top level in Europe. Decision made.
  10. Inter Milan head coach Simone Inzaghi leaves club ‘by mutual agreement’
  11. I am going to call it Mike Maignan is soon at Chels no more semi critical bleeps from me although I had other (better IMHO) targets over the past few years, he will almost certainly be a MASSIVE improvement over anything we have now (unless Penders blows up in a few years)
  12. THREE YEARS ON - A Personal Perspective from a Supporter of over 50 years FAN VIEW By Craige Coren https://siphillipstalkschelsea.substack.com/p/three-years-on-a-personal-perspective Hi folks and thank you to Si, for allowing me to share these thoughts. If this is well received, I have other ideas under a “View of a Supporter” banner. Please let me say that it is not my intent to cross over into the areas covered by the better and more knowledgeable writers on this forum. As many of you know, I would like to be clear from the outset that, as perhaps one of the more positive parties on this forum (although not alone), I am not blind or stupid enough to not recognise and acknowledge everyone’s perspective and points of view, some of which agree with. I, like many, 100% accept that mistakes have been made by the ownership since they took over; I also accept there are elements that have been both good and bad with our managers; that we have poor as well as good players; and that some of the decisions of our SD's have been good and some very bad. There is always a balance and often unknown reasons behind these decisions. Let’s all also acknowledge & remember that in Roman’s times we appointed both good (great) managers as well as bad (very) ones (who appointed Benitez please), we purchased some good (great) players, but we also purchased bad (very average) ones – past their best, on big expensive contracts etc. Therefore, no ownership is perfect. The reality today is that we must accept is the football world has moved on since Roman arrived, as has the Premier League & the Champions League. At times the past two years some aspects have frustrated & annoyed me, like many others. That said as an “old fart” I am perhaps a little more patient than some (my son included). I have always liked to see the bigger picture & the long game (in life as well Chelsea). I know from developing business and teams myself that it takes time, and you sometimes must go back to go forward. CFC was in a mess long before the new ownership took over, we were already going backwards, and a clean break and refresh, I believe, was required. Added to that with the football and financial regulations now in place our model had to change. To support this, we have just finished 15 points behind Liverpool, the smallest gap to the champions since when we won the PL in 2017 (8 years) and won another European Competition. I would add to this, if I recall correctly, that a lot of the supporters at the time, would have been happy for Sir Jim Ratcliffe to take over the club. As they say be “careful what you wish for”. In the context of these review please let us recall that the new ownership took over 3 years ago in May 2022. At that time, everyone was coming out of the Covid era & the financial affects & CFC had sanctions against the club for several months that stopped any proactive action being taken on and off the pitch. This led to valuable assets (Rudiger & Christensen) leaving for nothing which was also partly down to poor club management prior to the sanctions. We should not have allowed the contracts to run down for the last 12 months. As a result the new ownership had minimal time to plan for the upcoming season, and I know personally that some of Roman’s Team decided to walk rather than stay & help with the handover and help a smoother progression. The rhetoric at the time was that the ownership pushed all of them out when, to my personal knowledge, it in fact it was a mixture of both. This however is not unusual when there is a new ownership of any company, in any business area that takes over a company and it also happened at Liverpool, Manchester City, Aston Villa, Newcastle, Nottingham Forest, Leeds etc. to name a few in the recent past & look at the current debacle at Manchester United. Changes of this nature often include the manager / coach being changed as well. Todd Boehly and Clearlake initially decided to stick and not twist but it did not work. Like many of you, I loved Thomas Tuchel. He is, without a doubt his own man and often it’s his way or no way. He is a great manager but not always a team player. At Mainz he pushed his was out; at Dortmund they purchased the players he insisted on, did not win what they expected and fell out with the board; then at PSG he again strong armed the ownership to buying his choice of players and also released players he did not want (including our hero Thiago), some of whom the board thought that should retain. This all left to a very fractious relationship with the ownership and again his departure. I repeat that TT is a very good manager but has clearly got a short lifespan at any one club (aka Jose) and rarely has a good long-term relationship with the ownership or board of those clubs. Therefore, it should not have been a surprise that what evolved led to his departure at CFC. Again, I accept that mistakes have been made with the appointment of the manager(s) since TT left & there has been a level of naivety. That said I don’t recall many of us (me included) being against the Potter appointment and I was (as some of you will recall) positive about the appointment of Pochettino and wanted him to stay. To be honest, I was also lukewarm about the appoint of Enzo Maresca at the time. However, I repeat that I always look at the bigger picture and as I have said many times PATIENT. Personally, I understand the vision of the ownership and I am still willing to support it. These are serious business people & investors who make & own their decisions, even if they don’t vocalise this to the support base. This has all led to their significant personal business success. This will not be the first time they have invested in a business they did not know significantly and made it a success of it. Whilst I don’t know for sure, I would bet they have surrounded themselves with people that have whatever knowledge they don’t have & need. We might not like some of those choices, but they are the ones that make these decisions & probably believe that they have got it right more often than not in their careers & as investors. I know that in my own personal career that some of the people I brought into my teams did not have the support of all of my fellow directors but as a team leader you live or fail on your own decisions (thankfully I got more right than wrong, but I got some wrong & had to deal with the fall out). Setting aside the first 12 months, which I acknowledge was a mess (partly due to Covid & the sanctions), there is no doubt that we were affected by the ownership change & a lack of structure & experience within the club that developed. Since then, we have seen a lot of players come in and out of the club. In my mind this may continue for another couple of years as the ownership and those around them continue to develop & improve the squad & the clubs infrastructure. We already have exciting additions for next year that have either been pre-purchased and/or loaned out, but these are often forgotten. I also often hear that we have spent £1.5BN in that period (including on the chat here). The reality is that CFC have spent a net amount closer to £750M over the past 5 years and £625M over the past 3 years since the ownership took over (c/o Football 365). Added to this we have players on secure long-term contracts (no players are walking for nothing or leaving unless we want to sell them). Added to this the ownership brought down the wage bill & what we pay individual players considerably. The performance related structure makes sense, and I think is used at other clubs across Europe & is becoming the norm if it hasn’t already. The club is now being run on good financial terms & basis for the first time for probably 30+ years. Uncle Ken (Bates) nearly let us go bust and Roman’s world is not sustainable with today’s rules (much to the frustration of Newcastle). It is also important to remember that our academy has been part of our financial strategy for a long time. In England we have generated the most funds from out academy since 2014 and in Europe only Benfica, Ajax, Lyon the great Real Madrid have raised more. CFC have generated £350M up to the end of 2022/23 and more since (c/o Football Observatory). If it is good enough for Real Madrid (& Man City) and helps us developed a stronger squad over the next few years, is good enough to me. I will accept however, like many, that the way some players have been treated & handled could have been better. I guess this is just the harder nosed business approach of this ownership (and coaches) than we have seen before. At this stage you night ask what my point is. I have sought to set the scene & background from my perspective and viewpoint. It’s important when we consider the past and then look at this season & beyond. Please all remember that the season is over 38 league games (plus three cup competitions this year) and not pre-Xmas and post-Xmas, or 6 games here or 10 games there. As they say, “the league table never lies”. We achieved this season’s prime aim, a return to Champions League and win the Conference League. Does it matter it matter that the league happened on the last day of the season – I would say no, except for the tension it creates for all of us. It didn’t matter in 2003-04 when Jesper Gronkjaer scored that magical goal that saved us financially, gave us a CL place and led to Roman’s purchase of the club. This season has been wild season when compared with other seasons in the PL: Liverpool – 84 points v Manchester City’s 91 last season (with less goals for and more goals against as well). Arsenal – they came second again but with a reduction of 15 points (let’s not also forget that they have also been seeking a #9 for 2 years & perhaps would have won the league this year with one) Manchester City – 21 points less than last year and they only achieved CL in the last weekend. Manchester United & Tottenham, part of the so-called big six, lost 18 and 22 games, respectively. Tottenham finished fourth bottom with only 38 points, lost 22 games (a record for a team staying up) & were four points adrift from the team above. The competitiveness of PL has been shown by the fact that clubs in 8th, 9th, 10th & 11th all individually reach their own record number of points in the PL. Looking at Chelsea, have we progressed? I think the answer is yes, but it is only and must only be a stepping stone. Chelsea goals conceded was only bettered by two clubs in the league. This was 20 better than last year. Only the top two lost less games than CFC. In the end we improved our position by 2 places and 6 points. Goal difference was +21 compared with +14 last season. Yes, we had a poor run post Xmas – February (perhaps March) but over the last 6 games only Man City bettered us (by 1 point). Much like last year if I recall. Over the last 10 games only Man City (+4) and Ason Villa (+1) were better than us. Even over the last 16 games we were the 5th best with Liverpool #1 but only by 5 points. We did this with it being youngest team in the PL across the season ever – 24 years 36 days (c/o We Ain’t Got No History) All I am saying is we need to sometime stay calm and look at the bigger picture. Yes, we were poor at times, very poor. I was as frustrated as all of you & at times found it hard to watch – but I did . This season should be seen as another stepping stone & we should acknowledge that year on year since the new ownership arrived, we have improved. There is still plenty to do and I will take year on year improvement. We are stagnating like Arsenal or going backwards like Manchester United or Tottemham. We can now progress with the next stage of the squad building but I for one want the ownership to stick to their principles and continue on a similar path. That’s not to say that they cannot and should not adapt those principles as required, but I support the overall strategy. Before anyone shouts at me, I am also for more experience if it fits into our overall principles and model. I would also like to see “one” head of football in an ideal world if the right person can be obtained. The good news is that with CL and other sources of money, not available this year, we will have a lot more funds as a result, a higher turnover and less PSR issues. I don’t think for one minute that the maximum is achievable this year but somewhere between £120M & £170M is and that could be a game changer for the club in many ways. This ignores additional income that will come from general sponsorship by way of (1) bonuses, (2) upgrades and (3) new avenues, including dare I say it sponsorship perhaps via Jordan (please). We will all have different favourite players that we would like the club to buy. The reality is that most of us, me included, really don’t know as much as the professionals. The professionals in the club have greater knowledge as that is it “just that” their profession in some form & they take a lot more time in reviewing options (months and years in most instances) & do not make judgements based upon the positive reels most of us get to see. In conclusion I repeat that as I did from the outset that I am perhaps one of the more positive parties on this forum but again I am not blind or stupid. I accept that mistakes have been made by all parties involved, including some of our fellow supporters for not being patient. On the back of another European victory and being back in the Champions League the bottom line is we are again on the up. Better placed then we were 25+ years ago prior to Glenn Hoddle arriving, with some great memories in the bank. I please ask (urge), a little more patience & let us all get behind ownership, sporting directors, manager and players & support a little stability. In conclusion I thank whoever led us each to individually CFC and that we are not all Tottenham (even with their win) and Manchester United supporters. Craige Coren
  13. Grealish to help Rogers move? https://siphillipstalkschelsea.substack.com/i/165073278/grealish-to-help-rogers-move Chelsea were recently interested in a move to sign Jack Grealish, but sources believe that’s now gone completely. However, he could still be involved in a Chelsea story this summer. That is because SPTC sources have heard that Aston Villa are working on a deal to bring him back to the club. And if that happens, it could open the door to Morgan Rogers leaving the club. As with many of these deals at the moment, his asking price of around £80m is a little too much for Chelsea. But if Villa get a ‘replacement’ in the door for him, they might be more willing to do a deal nearer to what Chelsea want. So let’s see, but Chelsea would love to bring Rogers in this summer and they believe they have a fair chance now Villa do not have Champions League football.
  14. still better than this....... I hope 🐶
  15. Jadon Sancho to leave Chelsea at end of loan, club to pay £5million penalty https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6390124/2025/06/03/jadon-sancho-Chelsea-transfer-clause/ Jadon Sancho is leaving Chelsea when his contract ends on June 30 after an agreement could not be reached over personal terms for the winger’s loan move to become permanent. Sancho, 25, joined from Manchester United last summer in a temporary transfer that featured an obligation to buy worth up to £25million. But it would still require a deal between Chelsea and the player, which has failed to materialise and opens up the door to Sancho’s departure. If the west London club opted against the acquisition they would face a £5million penalty charge and that payment will now be incurred. Sancho has options in England and elsewhere around Europe, which he is expected to explore before making a decision as to his next step. Despite the situation, Sancho remains popular at Stamford Bridge having helped Chelsea to a fourth-place finish in the Premier League — securing qualification for next season’s Champions League — and scored in their UEFA Conference League final win over Real Betis. Sancho scored in the Conference League final victory (John MacDougall/AFP via Getty Images) Sancho scored five goals and provided ten assists in 42 games for Chelsea with Maresca praising his contribution to the side’s achievements. “From now on is when we sit down with the club and decide about next year,” he told TNT Sports after the Conference League final of when a decision would be made. “Jadon Sancho, if we finished fourth, it’s because of Jadon, if we won tonight it’s because of Jadon. It’s also because of Robert Sanchez — during the season, everyone is up and down a little bit, that’s part of the game.” Sancho has made 83 appearances for Manchester United after joining from Borussia Dortmund in the summer of 2021 in an £85m deal. He previously came through the academy system at both Watford and Manchester City before his move to Germany in 2017. How will Sancho be remembered at Chelsea? Analysis by Chelsea correspondent Liam Twomey Jadon Sancho’s season at Chelsea was bookended by thrilling cameos: he introduced himself by coming off the bench to set up the winner and hear his name sung against Bournemouth in September, and signed off with the goal that made sure of UEFA Conference League triumph over Real Betis in Wroclaw. The frustration, if there is one, is that Sancho produced so few memorable moments in between those. Brilliant strikes against Tottenham and Ipswich Town underlined his rare talent, but there were also long stretches in which it was too easy to forget he was on the pitch. Sancho fell short of establishing himself as a no-brainer for Chelsea to sign permanently, and particularly on anything approaching his United salary. But he ends this short stint back in London with his reputation improved and with a winners’ medal in his pocket. There will be no bad feeling.
  16. Rachel Reeves threatens to sue Roman Abramovich over Chelsea FC sale proceeds https://uk.news.yahoo.com/rachel-reeves-threatens-sue-roman-213900093.html The chancellor and foreign secretary are threatening to take Roman Abramovich to court to seize the proceeds of his Chelsea FC sale. The Russian oligarch, who is sanctioned by the UK government over his alleged links to Vladimir Putin, sold Chelsea for £2.5bn to an American consortium in 2022, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Those funds remain in a frozen UK bank account but are meant to be used for humanitarian causes linked to the Ukraine war. Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Foreign Secretary David Lammy have now said they are "deeply frustrated" an agreement cannot be reached with the oligarch and will take him to court if it cannot be dealt with soon. In a joint statement, they said: "The government is determined to see the proceeds from the sale of Chelsea Football Club reach humanitarian causes in Ukraine, following Russia's illegal full-scale invasion. "We are deeply frustrated that it has not been possible to reach agreement on this with Mr Abramovich so far. "While the door for negotiations will remain open, we are fully prepared to pursue this through the courts if required, to ensure people suffering in Ukraine can benefit from these proceeds as soon as possible." Abramovich was forced to sell Chelsea - which he bought for a reported £140m - after 19 years of ownership, after being sanctioned by the government over his alleged close ties to the Russian president - something he denies. The sale was made under the supervision of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation, under the proviso the proceeds go to humanitarian aid in Ukraine. They cannot be moved or used without a licence from the office. In March, the Foreign Office said officials were in talks with Abramovich's representatives, but multiple sources told the BBC there had been no meetings between any Labour ministers and members of the foundation set up to oversee the funds since last July's general election. They said there was a deadlock and a political decision by a minister is needed to negotiate and sign off an agreement. It is not known if there has been meetings in the three months since then. The £2.5bn - and interest accrued - would make up for some of the reduction in the aid budget, announced in February.
×
×
  • Create New...