No not just stats wise. Drogba played a important in 2004-2006 but he wasn't crucial, Lampard was. It was Lampard who was second to Ronaldinho, who was in legendary form, for Player of the Year in 2005 (has a Chelsea player ever made the top 10 even after that?). He was the engine and passer in midfield. Always a available passing option, starting up attacks, switching play and finding the wingers quickly with ease. Frank was the main creator and making intelligent runs and exploiting spaces left by the opposition (which struck fear in their defences and pushed them back), Lampard was the player who would find the goal regularly and also score very important goals for the club. And due to his incredible fitness, he was always getting back quickly to defend and played a important part in our very organized defence. Lamps was the player who played every match and produced quality performances at unbelievable consistency. And when Drogba suffered from loss of form in the seasons 07/08 and 08/09, it was Lampard who we could count on and carried the team offensively. Especially in 08/09, when Lampard was simply magnificent throughout the season imo. Despite the irregular form of his team mates, bar Carvalho and A. Cole. Lampard was a very effective player but he wasn't all about stats, that would be an insult. Forwards always get far more attention than players in other positions. Drogba was key because of his own physical excellence in our physical style of play, but that doesn't mean he performed the best. When he was on form, he was simply incredible. But when he wasn't, he could be very frustrating. So yeah, on his day he was without a doubt the best offensive player but he suffered from loss of form far too often to top Lamps. That said, I really don't want this to sound like I don't know or appreciate what Drogba brought to the club. He was a top player and is one of the greats at Chelsea. But Lampard was even bigger for me. I guess we'll never agree on that.