tiby2979

I hope that he fails there. I have nothing personal against he but I am a Chelsea fan and I ain't Belgian and he would be a player of a rival club ;-)

I hope that he fails there. I have nothing personal against he but I am a Chelsea fan and I ain't Belgian and he would be a player of a rival club ;-)

I hope that he fails there. I have nothing personal against he but I am a Chelsea fan and I ain't Belgian and he would be a player of a rival club ;-)

You are very naive if you believe that Lampard sulked for the club and no for individual reasons.

Perfection

https://twitter.com/WeAreChelseaFC/status/628164904546140160

https://twitter.com/WeAreChelseaFC/status/628164904546140160

are you a city fan then .. Lies to fans destroys respect

DM and its delusive headlines

DM and its delusive headlines

Giving a tribute to a legend that move to a rival the first time back home is fine, but cheer him each time return is ridiculous, shameful and disrespectful to our club and our players.

Giving a tribute to a legend that move to a rival the first time back home is fine, but cheer him each time return is ridiculous, shameful and disrespectful to our club and our players.

I did not want to say, but ... this.

Forget it. If supposedly he refused an offer of 150K-a-week from PSG, it´s that he does not have any intentions of going to a foreign club.

As i look at it, the essence of loyalty in football is the of fans to their clubs. That is the true loyalty, that is untied. ¿To ensure the loyalty of their legends, the club has that to retain them until they want to retire and keep them in the XI although have better players than them? ¿How can say that a player is loyal to a club if this loyalty is conditioned by a contract and a place in the XI and titles and good money? ¿is this loyalty? no, this is convenience. If we had ten years without winning a title as Arsenal our best players would want leave although the club would want to retain them.
I have no problem with a player moving to a rival club, not really affect me that Cech will go to Arsenal, at least he was honest and never pretended loyalty to our club. My problem is with those players who claim to love their clubs and encourage an image of loyal legend and what they really loves is the titles and the money they earn. This is also being hypocritical.
IMO, the club owes nothing to these legends. For starters, if it had not been for the investment of Abramovich, Cech and Drogba never would have come here and Lampard and Terry would have left us in the prime of their careers. They have done great things for the club but have not done for love/loyalty but rather for money/titles, and all those things have gained in abundance, they have been amply rewarded for their services and they have benefited from the club so much as the club from them.

Meh, fuck the monarchy.

Every damn time you browse this thread you read the same shit someone else said a couple of pages ago

WTF? rival fan infiltrated here?

WTF? rival fan infiltrated here?

There's no hint at all. Here's what he really said:
"First I must agree everything with the club, we will have a meeting at the end of next week, and then I'll see if club will let me go. We have to agree with the club in which circumstances they will let me go". "There's a lot speculations in media. Let's see if club will let me go or not. But staying in England is NOT my priority. Everything's depending on what kind of offers I'll have, I will carefully explore all options, whether it be Germany, France or Spain. I should decide what will be best for me on football aspect ". "If all members of the board of directors say "no", so I have to stay. This is simple. I have a contract running until June 2016". Do you feel the club will let you go? "I hope so. After all these years, what I have done for the club and club done for me, I believe we can find a solution in which all parties will be satisfied". "Family is important, but my decision will be based mainly on football aspect. Sometimes football takes precedence. Of course, I won't go in complete contradiction with family. But I should make best choice for my football". Will you try to decide quickly? "I want to make everything clear as soon as possible, because then I have to change house, children's school, make all preparation, so it is better to have it resolved soon. Although the transfer window officially opens on July 1, but if I find a way to sort out everything before, I know it will be an advantage, of course". Sorry for bad translation, but I hope you'll understand.

This is nothing. Marca published last year that Jose had said that he would destroy the career of Courtois if he played against us in the matches vs AM.

I remember a statement he gave in october to Sky saying that move to City was not his decision. In january, after the media uncovered the lies behind his "loan" had no choice but to accept that had indeed been his choice.

NO THANKS

You have hit the mark. It is easy to forget what he did because unfortunately for him, there were no consequences. He failed to help the City to win the title, but if anyone has any doubt that he wanted it more than anything and that if successful would have been the happiest in the world at the cost of our failure is that is fooling himself.

No, because unlike Lampard, Cech did not mock the fans neither lied cowardly to protect his image