cosmicway

We lost to spurs 5-3 last season but that was against the run of play. Now it's one more proof that the team is in need of renewal. That has to be the prevailing logic now.

Look some of today's players are ok, namely the two goalkeepers and Eden. Some more could also prove useful such as Matic But to rebuild such teams you need to buy everything you can lay your hands on. Also introduce players from the youth squads if good enough. That's the only possible future. Let's all consider this as the established fact of the present situation. We need moral and determination. Suppose something else. Suppose we are relegated this season and come back in the next. Everybody here will be happy - that's for certain. That proves something. It proves when we work we can face up to all challenges. The enemy is moan and grumble and also statements to the effect "I 'm going to win the champions league with this team of boer war veterans I have". It does n't work that way - only brings disorientation.

balls

We had Lamps-Essien and Didier. This generation are slow motion people. Ok we need players like Oscar and Matic to have some power, but all of them ? You become snail. There have been failures too. Cuadrado was one and Falcao is nowhere on the scene. The year before we had Etoo. That one was good but old and left the team.

The bigger problem is up front. City are entitled to a goal in their home ground, but in any case it's the forward movements that stink.

There are too many slow players in this team, with the exception of Hazard. The tiny man Willian has succeded in becoming the no 2. That shows something.

Let's face it. We are worse than Panserraikos. Snail motion. When the ball moves a little bit fast those attackers we have simply can't follow - only if Hazard manages to go past 20 men.

The lowliest life characters make up such stories. I think we should delete. After all we are not being paid to recycle all the stories printed in the "Sun".

A fact that emerges is that Jose is not a member of the group of suitors, now numbering infinity minus one. Yet another old man told me once this piece of wisdom: He said you think you are a just person ? What about if your gf was a pickpocket ? You 'd go to the court and defend her, so you are not a just person. So if Jose was in the club, he 'd do the same even if we were to lose 6-0 following a spate of medical errors.

It's not cryptic. It means when you are on the party line you have to stay on the party line.

'twas the tweeter. Look one must be careful with these things. Suppose you are witness in a trial. The smarmy lawyer of the opposition tries to lure you into a trap. He says "look my dear sir, you talked so nice, but what about when the defendant helped that old lady cross the street ? is he not a nice guy after all ?". You fall into the trap and you say "yes, he is". The trial is lost, the lawyers of your side curse you. You should never use the tweeter.

You have made her into a Mata Hari, a scheming Byzantine empress and a femme diabolique all in one. Slow down ! I don't comment on Jose because it's his job to do these things.

Ha ha ! Plus he was some 35 meters away from the scene.

A three week ban seems to be a fair solution. It's careless riding - infringement of opponent down the stretch. Mind you if I was Abra I 'd make all of them run around the stadium ten times. They should also have to make train noises "ou-ou-ou" in the bends.

Eden was in pain. It does n't mean when you feel great pain after a knock that you have sustained injury. It's more often than not just a pain, neural reaction. I hit my elbow on a door and fainted but nothing of any importance happened. I think I played football soon after, with the school team. The new vid shows Mourinho had time to say to the medics "no don't go" but he did n't. The only remaining possibility is if Mourinho had already advised the doctors to ask him every time. Beyond that, the case for Mourinho's over the incident is all but extinct. Actually I think he was just moaninc in that tv interview. Jose is an innocent fellow and he does n't readily grasp the plots and machinations of the slimey press. But somehow the thing became explosive. I wonder. Something happens here. Somebody calls someone else a "c*nt", the homegrown expression indicating a slight difference of opinion between two users. Before it going to the judge, won't we try to sort it out ? So between the tv interview and the tweeter what happened ? Anyway both persons are living club history each from his own post and they 're not allowed to fall apart.

Those were football words spoken by Mourinho, in Portuguese language. When say Hazard misses that pen against the Croatian team, anyone is going to lapse into Portuguese. A cooling off period is called for, to be followed by talks for a negotiated solution.

Still don't get it. They start running from behind his back, so how could they know he did n't want them to ? Jon-Eva get to know Jose did n't want them to go in only after their return ! The speed of their movements also indicates they too wanted the game to resume as soon as possible and that they believed there was a real injury to the player. Mourinho evidently had a different view of Hazard's fall but after that he seems to understand what went on and his argument wih Eva lasts no more than one second. Then he fell victim to the journalist at interview time and then the positions became entrenched the way they are now.

The fans will be chanting Eva Carneiro in the next home match. That will be after the 11-0 defeat this Sunday and the forthcoming 3-0 defeat against WBA.

The divide and rule principle at work. It's clear now that the journalists were on a search and destroy mission.

It was a trap carefully set up.

Was it invasion of the pitch then ? Like that Spaniard Jimmy Jump who was chasing Figo in the Greece-Portugal euro final ? So the system is a) Mourinho says to the physios "invade" or Mourinho says to the physios "don't invade". Even so, the poor rascals did n't have time to confer with him or he with them. When Jose starts jumping in disapproval, Eva has reached the centre circle. As for "appreciation" we all know that the players of the team who want to hurry it up don't feign injury - so if someone goes down it's got to be for real. I did n't like the reaction either. The war was not won by soldiers reacting to the commands of comrade Stalin. So what might be better than a mutual apology ? We are in danger of going to City and losing 25-0 but if peace is reestablished we might as well reverse that.

Nobody knows what goes on behind the scenes. A journalist friend of mine was assigned the task to interview an association boss. We were together and I saw the questionnaire and I said "those are crap questions and he may also take offense". It was n't his questionnaire, they handed it to him and he says to me "don't be such a fool and shuffle my papers, leave them alone". Time passes, he gives it a read and goes on to change it himself ! Then the association boss comes around, the interview takes place and is aired, he seems happy and brings us fruit and ice cream. Then the next day the journalist friend gets the sack for modifying the questionnaire ! What was the conspiracy we never got to know. The other journos ? Was the association captain going to attack the journalist if he used the original questionnaire ? Sport is as bad as politics.

Mirror poll: http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/chelsea-doctor-eva-carneiro-working-6238547?ICID=FB_mirror_MF

Jose the Wenger eater we all loved has slipped low by stepping onto a little kitten. I 'm sure he has repented now and he oughta come out and say it.

A fire extinguisher is needed before it's too late. I don't agree with the deflection theory because we have n't started yet and M. City talk of 9-0 score.