Official - Carlo sacked

[dodojojo 510]

Yeah but the difference is the money. Here if Roman can offer the money then Carlo can build the team. He is doing it now, and will do it in the summer if he gets more money.

No, it's not about money. It would be about whether or not Ancelotti and Abramovich agree on the direction taken. If Ancelotti buys to keep playing the same system and style and/or if he insists on keeping some of the aging superstars around, I can see him going if RA isn't in agreement with this direction. As a coach, most are risk-averse, especially the Italians, and they aren't usually inclined to making radical changes. A new coach may be a better fit and plus the new coach may not have the baggage of history and personal relationships. He could come in and clear out some old/dead wood.

I'm not saying I want or think Ancelotti will go. I'm just presenting a plausible scenario of why he could go. I like Ancelotti from his Milan days so it's not like I want him gone. Just knowing his history, I wonder if he's got in him to lead Chelsea to a bright new dawn.

[laeth 527]

If we sack Ancelotti, I'll be disappointed. We can't just keep getting rid of managers when we have a slight downer on a season. Squad and club harmony will never be achieved if we keep ditching managers and hiring new ones!

[Guest justin_3d]

Will you ever stop spreading false info?

What are you talking about? It's the players Carlo bought. Torres not, as was bought by Roman. But these are the players Carlo ask for. So Carlo buy.

No, it's not about money. It would be about whether or not Ancelotti and Abramovich agree on the direction taken. If Ancelotti buys to keep playing the same system and style and/or if he insists on keeping some of the aging superstars around, I can see him going if RA isn't in agreement with this direction. As a coach, most are risk-averse, especially the Italians, and they aren't usually inclined to making radical changes. A new coach may be a better fit and plus the new coach may not have the baggage of history and personal relationships. He could come in and clear out some old/dead wood.

I'm not saying I want or think Ancelotti will go. I'm just presenting a plausible scenario of why he could go. I like Ancelotti from his Milan days so it's not like I want him gone. Just knowing his history, I wonder if he's got in him to lead Chelsea to a bright new dawn.

But Carlo can do that as well. He is building a good team with Ramires, David Luiz and Yossi. He will buy more in the summer and make the team more competitive. Heck even Emanolo said how they know they are missing that creative midfield after Lampard and Yossi where injured. Carlo knows what he needs and will continue to buiid it in the summer.

[Term-X 7,891]

SAF

That's the first logical thing red nose has said all season.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

Ferguson standing up for us?

[Guest justin_3d]

Ferguson standing up for us?

Is not standing up, is just telling the truth without trolling or hating.

And that is what i like. I never liked to hear opinions from fans, cause its usually fill with trolling, and hating views. Neutral opinion is the best...however SAF is not neutral in this case, but he is spot on.

[LDN Blue 7,903]

I never liked to hear opinions from fans, cause its usually fill with trolling, and hating views

Some-what of a hyperbole but I'll let you run with it..

[Guest justin_3d]

Some-what of a hyperbole but I'll let you run with it..

It's true. Like the hypocrisy when i see some Chelsea fan making fun of City spending...and they forget to look at their own team.

Hypocrisy at is best.

A great man once said, before you judge, take a look at yourself first, before judging...something like that. And is the same thing here, first look at the errors of your team before you going hating at other clubs.

[Term-X 7,891]

It's true. Like the hypocrisy when i see some Chelsea fan making fun of City spending...and they forget to look at their own team.

Hypocrisy at is best.

Not really, Chelsea earned a champions league spot (unlike city), thus the reason Roman came in.

The two poster boys for our club, terry & lamps are both pre-roman too. This club is nothing like City, and our fans have every right to make fun of them.

[Guest justin_3d]

Not really, Chelsea earned a champions league spot (unlike city), thus the reason Roman came in.

The two poster boys for our club, terry & lamps are both pre-roman too. This club is nothing like City, and our fans have every right to make fun of them.

The fun is of the money they spent just like Chelsea did. That is hypocrisy.

And speaking of club boys, City has more youth club graduates then we did for some time. They got Hart, SWP, and M. Richards. That is much better then ours with Terry....

[Term-X 7,891]

The fun is of the money they spent just like Chelsea did. That is hypocrisy.

And speaking of club boys, City has more youth club graduates then we did for some time. They got Hart, SWP, and M. Richards. That is much better then ours with Terry....

The source of any criticism surrounding finance (direct or indirect) is that Chelsea earned it (unlike city), and to this day have pre-roman players as stars.

Any counter-argument surrounding shite academy players like SWP are deemed irrelevant in conjunction to this.

[Guest justin_3d]

The source of any criticism surrounding finance (direct or indirect) is that Chelsea earned it (unlike city), and to this day have pre-roman players as stars.

Any counter-argument surrounding shite academy players like SWP are deemed irrelevant in conjunction to this.

There we go again, hating for no good reason at all.

It is why i don't like Fan views. It is the most bias out of all, because it's fill with hate views.

[Madmax 9,219]

Warning : thread derailed.

[spuz 143]

There we go again, hating for no good reason at all.

It is why i don't like Fan views. It is the most bias out of all, because it's fill with hate views.

Without causing an argument can I just say that it's you that goes opposing any view by calling them a glory hunter.

[Guest justin_3d]

Without causing an argument can I just say that it's you that goes opposing any view by calling them a glory hunter.

No i called glory hunters those who did not support Carlo for this bad blip, after having seen the good season he did last season.

That is glory hunter to me.