Jump to content

The Pub - Discuss Anything


Manuf
 Share

Recommended Posts

Her face is like 8.5/10 - which is very good but not worth the hype.

Her hips to waist ratio is like 3/10 - in all honesty, I have a better ratio and I'm a guy.

Her butt is mediocre, 6/10 at best.

Her boobs are not even a 10 imo, more like 9 or 9.5 - their size is very good but I like them firmer than that. They're kinda saggy, I dunno.

8.5 + 3 + 6 + 9.5 = 27/40 -> 6,75.

Everything considered, average girl. Overrated and overhyped.

Here is the evidence:

Hips to waist ratio, absolutely atrocious - look at this shit:

kate-upton-the-other-woman-stills_1.jpg

Butt - almost flat, very unimpressive:

upton.jpg

Face - not outstanding, but not bad - her mole makes she look like a whore though, which I don't like:

kate-upton-wallpaper-5.jpg

Boobs - the only redeeming atribute:

kate-upton-terry-richardson-outtakes-101

Honestly never understood the hype. I had never seen such an average girl receive so much praise before.

A mathematic equation as to why a girl who is massively out of your league isn't hot.

Maths + misogyny = virgin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have 1 Lebanese family friend that cooked a dish. I am not sure what it is called but it was chicken in tomato based sauce and the rice had small noodles mixed in it.

rice+pilaf.JPG

Amazing stuff! Would like one day to visit for sure.

We eat that rice with all the stews. And chicken in tomato sauce could also be a number of stews. We have like a thousand different types of Lebanese dishes. If you can get me the name of it, I'll get you the recipe from my Mom if you want :)

PS: Thumbs up for the avatar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We eat that rice with all the stews. And chicken in tomato sauce could also be a number of stews. We have like a thousand different types of Lebanese dishes. If you can get me the name of it, I'll get you the recipe from my Mom if you want :)

PS: Thumbs up for the avatar.

I will ask him when I meet him! Hopefully I can one day come for a visit. I love middle eastern food in general, and everytime I meet middle eastern people they always have the best hospitality. Quite similar with eastern hospitality, like giving food, etc. Something I miss from being in New Zealand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK lads enough of tits, virgins and marks out of 10, take this to the Sexiest women thread please and back to Cesc.

Cheers.

Buzz kill! This was the best page I've read all week :lol:

No, seriously, I'm moving this whole thing to the pub so we don't scare any newcomers.

PS: Congrats @Muzchap!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will ask him when I meet him! Hopefully I can one day come for a visit. I love middle eastern food in general, and everytime I meet middle eastern people they always have the best hospitality. Quite similar with eastern hospitality, like giving food, etc. Something I miss from being in New Zealand.

Yeah, the hospitality of people, especially in the country side even keeps surprising me. But I do feel that in some areas the people have taken it a bit too far. In the Beka' region, you deeply offend someone, even if a total stranger, if you turn down his/her lunch or dinner invitations even if you have somewhere else to be!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Her face is like 8.5/10 - which is very good but not worth the hype.

Her hips to waist ratio is like 3/10 - in all honesty, I have a better ratio and I'm a guy.

Her butt is mediocre, 6/10 at best.

Her boobs are not even a 10 imo, more like 9 or 9.5 - their size is very good but I like them firmer than that. They're kinda saggy, I dunno.

8.5 + 3 + 6 + 9.5 = 27/40 -> 6,75.

Everything considered, average girl. Overrated and overhyped.

Here is the evidence:

Hips to waist ratio, absolutely atrocious - look at this shit:

kate-upton-the-other-woman-stills_1.jpg

Butt - almost flat, very unimpressive:

upton.jpg

Face - not outstanding, but not bad - her mole makes she look like a whore though, which I don't like:

kate-upton-wallpaper-5.jpg

Boobs - the only redeeming atribute:

kate-upton-terry-richardson-outtakes-101

Honestly never understood the hype. I had never seen such an average girl receive so much praise before.

Hey! If my wife says Kate Upton is hot, then Kate Upton is fucking hot! Got it? :readthemessage:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Her face is like 8.5/10 - which is very good but not worth the hype.

Her hips to waist ratio is like 3/10 - in all honesty, I have a better ratio and I'm a guy.

Her butt is mediocre, 6/10 at best.

Her boobs are not even a 10 imo, more like 9 or 9.5 - their size is very good but I like them firmer than that. They're kinda saggy, I dunno.

8.5 + 3 + 6 + 9.5 = 27/40 -> 6,75.

Everything considered, average girl. Overrated and overhyped.

Here is the evidence:

Hips to waist ratio, absolutely atrocious - look at this shit:

kate-upton-the-other-woman-stills_1.jpg

Butt - almost flat, very unimpressive:

upton.jpg

Face - not outstanding, but not bad - her mole makes she look like a whore though, which I don't like:

kate-upton-wallpaper-5.jpg

Boobs - the only redeeming atribute:

kate-upton-terry-richardson-outtakes-101

Honestly never understood the hype. I had never seen such an average girl receive so much praise before.

u r a fuckwit m8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's misogynistic if you consider treating women as sex objects as misogyny, and frankly, evaluating somebody with such stringent criteria entirely based on physical features is objectification.

Assigning numerical values to rate the attractiveness of somebody is ridiculous. This is a human being not a car, there are far more complex factors that decide attractiveness than a series of hip to waist ratios or whatever. You can't rate somebody's attractiveness objectively until you meet them in person and/or get to know them well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also I would smash the fuck out of that. And you're kidding yourself if you say no. There's virtually no chance you'll ever meet (meet, not see) anybody in the flesh hotter than her, so it doesn't matter that there are dozens of female A-list celebrities that have better hip to waist ratios. I know for a fact that if she came up to any (single, or if you're in a relationship, then it depends on your celebrity pass arrangements) heterosexual male poster on this forum and offered sex, every one of us would take the offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's misogynistic if you consider treating women as sex objects as misogyny, and frankly, evaluating somebody with such stringent criteria entirely based on physical features is objectification.

Assigning numerical values to rate the attractiveness of somebody is ridiculous. This is a human being not a car, there are far more complex factors that decide attractiveness than a series of hip to waist ratios or whatever. You can't rate somebody's attractiveness objectively until you meet them in person and/or get to know them well.

That isn't misogyny. It isn't hatred or fear or women. It is sexist I'll give you that, but misogynistic. Sexism is often misogynistic or misandric/misandrist (what is the word for that?) in nature but in this case it isn't. Every one at one stage or another is guilty of objectifying another person as a sex object, you have, I have. Don't deny it. But I refuse to believe the times I have objectified women was misogynistic in nature. Maybe if you take it a step further and have a man that always, and I repeat always treats women like a sex object than I will concede that it is misogynistic in this case.

You can't rate someone's attractiveness objectively full stop, mate. It's subjective. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That isn't misogyny. It isn't hatred or fear or women. It is sexist I'll give you that, but misogynistic. Sexism is often misogynistic or misandric/misandrist (what is the word for that?) in nature but in this case it isn't. Every one at one stage or another is guilty of objectifying another person as a sex object, you have, I have. Don't deny it. But I refuse to believe the times I have objectified women was misogynistic in nature. Maybe if you take it a step further and have a man that always, and I repeat always treats women like a sex object than I will concede that it is misogynistic in this case.

You can't rate someone's attractiveness objectively full stop, mate. It's subjective. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

pls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You