Alee. 182 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Saw this debate in the Club America thread, thought i'd make a topic for it. So, Basically, we can keep only one of them, who? I'd say Sheva, but well, 140000 / week for a player who is below Sturridge and DiSanto in our priority levels? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Both. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Sheva. and if we keep both it's r.i.p sturridge & di santo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrismada9 1,948 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 I agree... both! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alee. 182 Posted July 27, 2009 Author Share Posted July 27, 2009 Sheva. and if we keep both it's r.i.p sturridge & di santo. Agree that keeping both would be a disaster for Sturridge and DiSanto.. But keeping Sheva at that PayCheck ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueLion. 21,491 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Its not as if we have no cash, CB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 pizzaro is a great striker for a club like aston villa or spurs but not a champions league heavyweight like Chelsea, the only striker subs on the bench should be young talent like di santo and sturridge. not old men who want huge wages for murdering di santo & sturridges career. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 2,275 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 (edited) Neither. Edited July 27, 2009 by ShaneCFC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alee. 182 Posted July 27, 2009 Author Share Posted July 27, 2009 Its not as if we have no cash, CB. Doesn't mean we have to waste it. We can do better then Shevchenko if we need a what, 6th Striker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 Doesn't mean we have to waste it. We can do better then Shevchenko if we need a what, 6th Striker? both the boys could learn from sheva....he is still true class ,,,if you cant see that well........ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alee. 182 Posted July 27, 2009 Author Share Posted July 27, 2009 I know sheva is class mate, But we'll have: Drogba Anelka Kalou DiSanto Sturridge Shevchenko Pizzaro Are we Man City? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Term-X 7,891 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 first team - drogba & anelka subs - di santo & sturridge sheva.. if we must Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alee. 182 Posted July 27, 2009 Author Share Posted July 27, 2009 Thats my point, If we must keep a fifth striker, Why do we pay him the most? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 if sheva had come on instead of anelka in moscow ,,,we would have won the fucking the C L and JT wouldnt still be having nightmares Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 2,275 Posted July 27, 2009 Share Posted July 27, 2009 That is the stupidest thing I have heard posted on this forum. Who's to say the person after Anelka wouldn't have missed too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.