Jump to content
Join Talk Chelsea and log in to join the CFC discussion! ×

Radamel Falcao

BlueLion.

By BlueLion.,
in Strikers

 Share

Recommended Posts

DavidEU

DavidEU 2,023

Posted
Posted

Also if you were Dzeko or Jovetic, who have both started the season brightly, and your club bought Falcao two days before the close of the window, you'd storm in to Pellegrinis office ASAP and ask to move. Wouldn't you?

By the way, L'Equipe are mentioning Juventus as well as Real Madrid. No mention of City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

lionsden
lionsden

People will try to justify and get excited over anything. We could sign a balloon and some people will be like "that balloon once scored for sunderland against liverpool, it will return to form.

Madmax
Madmax

All that stuff by Mourinho about earning your time on the pitch - never a bigger indictment of it as total BS than having Falcao get more minutes over Remy.

Special Juan
Special Juan

I'm more worried about players like Ramires who can't pass a ball than Falcao.

Posted Images

The Chels

The Chels 2,502

Posted
Posted

Also if you were Dzeko or Jovetic, who have both started the season brightly, and your club bought Falcao two days before the close of the window, you'd storm in to Pellegrinis office ASAP and ask to move. Wouldn't you?

By the way, L'Equipe are mentioning Juventus as well as Real Madrid. No mention of City.

Why? They'll be happy on the bench collecting their pay cheques.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Myself

Myself 793

Posted
Posted

I understand them.. Agüero is always injured, Jovetic is not a CF(he is playing on the wing right now). Dzeko and Negredo are good but Falcao is way better.. It's a great piece of buisness for them to sell Negredo and loan Falcao.

Exactly. That mentality is why football is going down the shitter. We could say this.. Costa is good, but Messi is better. Lets get him.

You don't buy someone because they're good, you buy them because you need them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlueLyon

BlueLyon 9,359

Posted
Posted

I will probably get some stick for saying that but if City signs Falcao while we sign Remy, that could decide the title. There is a lot of IFs, but City strike force will be extremely good then, not to say that they already won it last year with prety much same team, that is now improved in defence and midfield.

Im very against nonsense spending, but sometimes if there is quality player who will improve you available, maybe you take that option. Last time we won title, we spent like crazy, Im not pointing that we should spend alot again, because that is not the right way (just look at united), but to invest properly. If we win league because of Falcao, or if we lose it because Remy wont do well in Costa absence, Im sure no one will say it was wrong to bring Falcao. Lot of IFs, but hardly would Falcao do worse than Remy, however Remy could cost us points and then there is no return.

Anyway, Remy is here and I hope he does well in next seasons, help us to win lot of trophies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nyikolajevics

nyikolajevics 2,594

Posted
Posted

Exactly. That mentality is why football is going down the shitter. We could say this.. Costa is good, but Messi is better. Lets get him.

You don't buy someone because they're good, you buy them because you need them.

It's professional football, not a family... If someone is not good enough they will be replaced, that's it.. If we had the oppurtunity to sign Messi we would get rid of Schürrle or Oscar or anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iseah100

iseah100 5,612

Posted
Posted

I will probably get some stick for saying that but if City signs Falcao while we sign Remy, that could decide the title. There is a lot of IFs, but City strike force will be extremely good then, not to say that they already won it last year with prety much same team, that is now improved in defence and midfield.

Im very against nonsense spending, but sometimes if there is quality player who will improve you available, maybe you take that option. Last time we won title, we spent like crazy, Im not pointing that we should spend alot again, because that is not the right way (just look at united), but to invest properly. If we win league because of Falcao, or if we lose it because Remy wont do well in Costa absence, Im sure no one will say it was wrong to bring Falcao. Lot of IFs, but hardly would Falcao do worse than Remy, however Remy could cost us points and then there is no return.

Anyway, Remy is here and I hope he does well in next seasons, help us to win lot of trophies.

Great strikeforce and they scored 0 goals vs Stoke.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Myself

Myself 793

Posted
Posted

It's professional football, not a family... If someone is not good enough they will be replaced, that's it.. If we had the oppurtunity to sign Messi we would get rid of Schürrle or Oscar or anyone.

... if you don't get what I was trying to say, don't respond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The only place to be

The only place to be 11,313

Posted
Posted

I will probably get some stick for saying that but if City signs Falcao while we sign Remy, that could decide the title. There is a lot of IFs, but City strike force will be extremely good then, not to say that they already won it last year with prety much same team, that is now improved in defence and midfield.

Earlier you were saying that City had 4 near world-class strikers....and they lose at home today.

I think people need to relax on demanding 'name' strikers (because that's what Falcao is until he proves he's fully recovered from a bad injury) and trust Jose and the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlueLyon

BlueLyon 9,359

Posted
Posted

Earlier you were saying that City had 4 near world-class strikers....and they lose at home today.

I think people need to relax on demanding 'name' strikers (because that's what Falcao is until he proves he's fully recovered from a bad injury) and trust Jose and the board.

Credit for Stoke this time, they were outstanding.

Besides I dont demand ''name'' striker, just someone who is going to do work. Matic for example, wasnt expensive but I was completely for this signing, as I saw him alot and knew he will be great under Mou. I just dont feel the same for Remy. And apparently Falcao is available for loan, that wouldnt be too expensive (I dont believe that 20m rumour), while I would never pay 60m for him...that case, I would go with Remy then.

City strikers are quality, its not like they will play like today every game. Almost each scored 20 goals last term after all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You

Sure, let me in!
Enter