Marvin123 534 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 i think Malouda off the wage bill will help towards FFP for Falcao too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 Every player is a gamble actually, Madrid paid 60m for world player of the year Kaka, he's been a disappointment.Part in bold is true though, but it would be better with almost any other decent striker and not Torres.To other hand Ronaldo was even more expensive and is easiy their best player since Zidane.About Mata he wont be the best play maker around untill he learn how to play against physical sides, and with little space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 To other hand Ronaldo was even more expensive and is easiy their best player since Zidane.About Mata he wont be the best play maker around untill he learn how to play against physical sides, and with little space.He been involved in more goals than any other playmaker in the league this season, and has been the most consistent. David Silva and Santi Cazorla aren't exactly going to be players that can battle physically with Premier League defenders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheva. 5,373 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 To other hand Ronaldo was even more expensive and is easiy their best player since Zidane.About Mata he wont be the best play maker around untill he learn how to play against physical sides, and with little space.He gets bullied off the ball too easily, i can agree with that. But regardless he's still a top top playmaker: who scores goals, assists, and is quality on set-pieces.They're very few players i would trade him for.And on Madrid, Ronaldo was a good buy for them, but they've had a lot of flops spending big money on good players. Players that didn't quite turn out as well as they had hoped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chelsea Legend 11 4,062 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 No, it's not how it works at all. If a TV costs $1,000 and you sell your old X-Box for $100, does the TV cost $900? No. It still costs $1,000. You just sold something else to get money to help you afford the TV. It doesn't make the TV any cheaper. It's like those Liverpool supporters who claim getting Andy Carroll was good business because it was Torres for Carroll and 15M pounds.Well, Liverpool had 50M pounds and they could have spent it any way they wanted. If we sell Sturridge for 12M pounds, we'll have 12M pounds to spend. We could spend it anywhere. It doesn't make any transfer cheaper or better value. Falcao is going to cost 48M pounds. That would make him, the 6th highest transfer (adjusting for inflation) ever. Chelsea could sell five players and it wouldn't change that. If Chelsea have 50M pounds to spend, they'd be much better off spreading it around in a few areas of need. Falcao does have a low bust potential but he has a high potential for not being worth what we would have to pay. Chelsea would be paying close to 20M pounds every year for Falcao (in amortized transfer payments and wages). To be worth what we would be paying him, Falcao would have to be just about the best striker in the world every year. The chances of that happening are slim. Are we talking about football transactions or tv's from future shop??? Wow this is getting annoying! Mate if we use the 12m to help fund Falcao then yes, we have effectively used the money from a sturridge sale to buy Falcao! Why is that so hard to comprehend?I was merely asking you if we could trade Sturridge and £36m for Falcao would you do it? All this nonsense about Caroll and Liverpool is utter garbage. If you're answer is no simply say no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 To other hand Ronaldo was even more expensive and is easiy their best player since Zidane.About Mata he wont be the best play maker around untill he learn how to play against physical sides, and with little space.Mata won't be the best until he changes his nationality to Brazillian ..AND if he makes a mistake and becomes a Belgian he will be fucked forever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 And I would take a good striker, a RB and a CM over Falcao alone any day of the week. Wallace, De Bruyne, sorted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHOULO19 24,332 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 Wallace, De Bruyne, sorted.Still no excuse to spend 50m and 200k/wk that we don't have on one player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KonohasOrangeFlash 2,607 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 Still no excuse to spend 50m and 200k/wk on one player. There is when its Falcao. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 Having a world class forward in top form won't solve all our problems, but they will make them seem less.I remember Carlo's first season, i thought for a fair chunk of the season their was clear signs the team was on the way down, what covered up that fact? Didier Drogba's form and goals.United's team are not great, what's covering that fact? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 Having a world class forward in top form won't solve all our problems, but they will make them seem less.I remember Carlo's first season, i thought for a fair chunk of the season their was clear signs the team was on the way down, what covered up that fact? Didier Drogba's form and goals.United's team are not great, what's covering that fact?You are right of course. Especially when you say it won't solve our problems, but will cover them up.But for how long will it cover them up? And covering those problems up is not a long-term solution. If I was a United fan I would be terrified right now. Their dependance on Van Persie is ridiculous. What if he gets injured? I don't know. Depending so much on one player would terrify my. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted December 20, 2012 Share Posted December 20, 2012 You are right of course. Especially when you say it won't solve our problems, but will cover them up.But for how long will it cover them up? And covering those problems up is not a long-term solution. If I was a United fan I would be terrified right now. Their dependance on Van Persie is ridiculous. What if he gets injured? I don't know. Depending so much on one player would terrify my.Hopefully the club will be aware of that and sort it out at the same time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Mata won't be the best until he changes his nationality to Brazillian ..AND if he makes a mistake and becomes a Belgian he will be fucked forever The funny thing is: the Rmpr guy liked your post, and he was the one saying I dont like anything related to Brazil. It only shows how both of you are retards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slam Dunk 1,442 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 Still no excuse to spend 50m and 200k/wk that we don't have on one player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSunshine 672 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 If I was a United fan I would be terrified right now. Their dependance on Van Persie is ridiculous. What if he gets injured? I don't know. Depending so much on one player would terrify my.Well you should be terrified then because we have one, his name is Mata. I have my doupts about spending so much money on one player but what you said isn't a reason not to buy Falcao. On the contrary he will provide a solution to this matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 You are right of course. Especially when you say it won't solve our problems, but will cover them up.But for how long will it cover them up? And covering those problems up is not a long-term solution. If I was a United fan I would be terrified right now. Their dependance on Van Persie is ridiculous. What if he gets injured? I don't know. Depending so much on one player would terrify my.If I was a United fun I would be really, its hard to be terrified when you are on top of PL with a 6 points gap. Every team in the world have their own problems, but the biggest problem in football is losing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zolayes 14,489 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 The funny thing is: the Rmpr guy liked your post, and he was the one saying I dont like anything related to Brazil. It only shows how both of you are retards.I know you hate Belgians TOSSER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrique 9,133 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 I know you hate Belgians TOSSERIndeed, but I like their beer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corner 456 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 If I was a United fun I would be really, its hard to be terrified when you are on top of PL with a 6 points gap. Every team in the world have their own problems, but the biggest problem in football is losing.I guess I'm just different to you then.When we won the double under Carlo, I could see many problems developing which probably stopped me from enjoying that season to fully. And look where we are this season. Those problems carried on form then, and now we have a few vital problems that need to be fixed. I can see United having a massive downfall after two or three more seasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomo 21,751 Posted December 21, 2012 Share Posted December 21, 2012 I guess I'm just different to you then.When we won the double under Carlo, I could see many problems developing which probably stopped me from enjoying that season to fully. And look where we are this season. Those problems carried on form then, and now we have a few vital problems that need to be fixed. I can see United having a massive downfall after two or three more seasons.I actually think Fergie is responsible for this.His continued blind faith in Giggs and Scholes is alarming, as is his thinking that is still 2008 where Vidic, Rio and Evra are concerned. He has started to get a bit sentimental in his old age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.