Jump to content

Raheem Sterling


RoyalBlues
 Share

Recommended Posts

Im curious about something... it seems like the least loved player on here this days is Oscar, yet in the transfer window subjects most people talk about replacing Willian in our first eleven, not Oscar.

Is it because you think we'll replace both (wouldnt happen) or most just prefers Oscar's contribution to Willian's? It seems to me like Willian is the player to stay in our line up right now. Question is where he'd play, continue in RW to have competition from Cuadrado, or move to CAM, than he'll have real competition from Oscar.

In reality there's only one question - what Jose prefers? another falshy winger or a CAM/CM who would make us more dominant and fluid in midfield and would allow Cesc more chances to go up. We wont get both.

Really? Have seen so many wanting Koke to replace Oscar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We need a winger IMO, and by that I mean replicating the threat we have on the left with Hazard. A dribbler, a direct threat, someone who gets one on one and destroys people with pace and ability. Willian is not a winger for me, he's more of a number 10. I appreciate what Willian offers but out wide he is not the answer and until Cuadrado settles in we have a problem out wide on the right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What else do you expect here when Sterling is an attacking wide player? :carlo:

If a member prefers Willian to Oscar, but want us to buy a right winger, i would expect him to say this- "We need a new winger to replace Willian, who needs to move to the center". Thats not what people say here, and when you see that the same people really dont want Oscar, it makes their opinion to be slightly unclear of what they really want. Off course i dont have a problem with members who prefers Oscar, thats not about them im asking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't always work as well as on paper/fifa though. I mean there are track backs, not stepping on each other's shoes...etc. That is why dream teams rarely work in football, because sometime a limited player is better for the balance of the team than a more talented player. I mean it is all well having 2 great wingers who can express themselves, but it is useless if they both neglect their defensive duties or not being able to do it both to a good standard anyway. That is why Willian seems to be working well for us even though his offensive contribution is next to 0, he is one of the best tracking back attacking mid in the world which allows Hazard the freedom to do his things more often.

Hazard tracks abck excellently. He just does not seem to get the defensive recignition that others like Sanchez and Willian gets. I was having a debate with an Arsenal fan about who is the better player between Sanchez and Hazard and who should get the PFA player of the season. He said to me that Sanchez works harder. I disagreed and said that is what the media leads you to believe. I was not denying Sanchez works hard but because it is picked up on more people will ignore the fact that Hazard has done a lot of defensive duties. What made my argument more pleasing is when I came across this analysis:

"while his work rate is underrated; he has won possession in the attacking third more times (28) than anyone else". That says it all. He constantly does his defensive work and helps. Mourinho has really trained him in that department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass the sick bucket - Rodgers already saying " if its trophies he wants...history...liverpool...successful...." usual bollocks.

Only outdone by young Sterling "its not about the money.....money..money" bullshit.

Fuck me if I was on 100k a week at 20, I wouldnt have made 21

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pass the sick bucket - Rodgers already saying " if its trophies he wants...history...liverpool...successful...." usual bollocks.

Only outdone by young Sterling "its not about the money.....money..money" bullshit.

Fuck me if I was on 100k a week at 20, I wouldnt have made 21

I would have died after the fist week. Too much money, far too much money to chase a piece of inflated plastic across a green field. I say not to this transfer for several reasons:

1. Sterling will cost more Sterling than any would like to admit. I am not sorry for the pun.

2. Paying Liverpool gives then room to make moves to strengthen their squad.

3. He is 20 and wants more money per week than half of sub-saharan Africa earns in the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Bascombe, a very relible Telegrahp journalist when it comes to Liverpool says Liverpool puts a 50m Pounds price tag on Sterling. That will remove the intrest of everyone i assume, even City. But now the question remines how much Sterling wants the move... can he be even more a dick about it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Bascombe, a very relible Telegrahp journalist when it comes to Liverpool says Liverpool puts a 50m Pounds price tag on Sterling. That will remove the intrest of everyone i assume, even City. But now the question remines how much Sterling wants the move... can he be even more a dick about it?

£50m might be slightly excessive but I would go for it. His true value is closer to £40m though (considering his potential and HG status).

To answer your question earlier as well - yeah, IMO a attacking midfield strata of Hazard - Willian - Sterling is very exciting and would probably be our best if we did sign Raheem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

£50m might be slightly excessive but I would go for it. His true value is closer to £40m though (considering his potential and HG status).

You would actually go for Sterling for £50m? you know thats 70m euros today? i think you could get TWO players who are at the very least as talented as Sterling for that amount. But i guess we have completely different opinions about Sterling.

I dont know a LFC fan who thinks Sterling worth more than 40-45 million Euros tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a winger IMO, and by that I mean replicating the threat we have on the left with Hazard. A dribbler, a direct threat, someone who gets one on one and destroys people with pace and ability. Willian is not a winger for me, he's more of a number 10. I appreciate what Willian offers but out wide he is not the answer and until Cuadrado settles in we have a problem out wide on the right.

moses had games where he did just that. I have not yet written him off as a squad player for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You would actually go for Sterling for £50m? you know thats 70m euros today? i think you could get TWO players who are at the very least as talented as Sterling for that amount. But i guess we have completely different opinions about Sterling.

I dont know a LFC fan who thinks Sterling worth more than 40-45 million Euros tbh.

I know plenty of Liverpool fans that think that if it wasn't for his contract, he'd be going for close to Bale money.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You