Jump to content

Spike
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Vesper said:

Kissinger also was involved in (the big difference with Trump is that Kissinger never had the actual power to order shit done, but he DEFFO influenced the ones who did)

David Corn: Henry Kissinger at 100: Still a War Criminal.

Forget the birthday candles, let’s count the dead.
 

Henry Kissinger is turning 100 this week, and his centennial is prompting assorted hosannas about perhaps the most influential American foreign policymaker of the 20th century. The Economist observed that “his ideas have been circling back into relevancy for the last quarter century.” The Times of London ran an appreciation: “Henry Kissinger at 100: What He Can Tell Us About the World.” Policy shops and think tanks have held conferences to mark this milestone. CBS News aired a mostly fawning interview veteran journalist Ted Koppel conducted with Kissinger that included merely a glancing reference to the ignoble and bloody episodes of his career. Kissinger is indeed a monumental figure who shaped much of the past 50 years. He brokered the US opening to China and pursued detente with the Soviet Union during his stints as President Richard Nixon’s national security adviser and secretary of state. Yet it is an insult to history that he is not equally known and regarded for his many acts of treachery—secret bombings, coup-plotting, supporting military juntas—that resulted in the death of hundreds of thousands. 

Kissinger’s diplomatic conniving led to or enabled slaughters around the globe. As he blows out all those candles, let’s call the roll.

Cambodia: In early 1969, shortly after Nixon moved into the White House and inherited the Vietnam War, he, Kissinger, and others cooked up a plan to secretly bomb Cambodia, in pursuit of enemy camps. With the perversely-named “Operation Breakfast” launched, White House chief of staff H.R. “Bob” Haldeman wrote in his diary, Kissinger and Nixon were “really excited.” The action, though, was of dubious legality; the United States was not at war with Cambodia and Congress had not authorized the carpet-bombing, which Nixon tried to keep a secret. The US military dropped 540,000 tons of bombs. They didn’t just hit enemy outposts. The estimates of Cambodian civilians killed range between 150,000 and 500,000.

Bangladesh: In 1970, a political party advocating autonomy for East Pakistan won legislative elections. The military dictator ruling Pakistan, Gen. Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan, arrested the leader of that party and ordered his army to crush the Bengalis. At the time, Yahya, a US ally, was helping Kissinger and Nixon establish ties with China, and they didn’t want to get in his way. The top US diplomat in East Pakistan sent in a cable detailing and decrying the atrocities committed by Yahya’s troops and reported they were committing “genocide.” Yet Nixon and Kissinger declined to criticize Yahya or take action to end the barbarous assault. (This became known as “the tilt” toward Pakistan.) Kissinger and Nixon turned a blind eye to—arguably, they tacitly approved—Pakistan’s genocidal slaughter of 300,000 Bengalis, most of them Hindus.

Chile: Nixon and Kissinger plotted to covertly thwart the democratic election of socialist president Salvador Allende in 1970. This included Kissinger supervising clandestine operations aimed at destabilizing Chile and triggering a military coup. This scheming yielded the assassination of Chile’s commander-in-chief of the Army. Eventually, a military junta led by Gen. Augusto Pinochet seized power, killed thousands of Chileans, and implemented a dictatorship, Following the coup, Kissinger backed Pinochet to the hilt. During a private conversation with the Chilean tyrant in 1976, he told Pinochet, “My evaluation is that you are a victim of all left-wing groups around the world and that your greatest sin was that you overthrew a government which was going communist.”

East Timor: In December 1975, President Suharto of Indonesia was contemplating an invasion of East Timor, which had recently been a Portuguese colony and was moving toward independence. On December 6, President Gerald Ford and Kissinger, then Ford’s secretary of state, en route from a visit to Beijing, stopped in Jakarta to meet with Suharto, who headed the nation’s military regime. Suharto signaled he intended to send troops into East Timor and integrate the territory into Indonesia. Ford and Kissinger did not object. Ford told Suharto, “We will understand and will not press you on the issue. We understand the problem and the intentions you have.” Kissinger added, “It is important that whatever you do succeeds quickly.” He pointed out that Suharto would be wise to wait until Ford and Kissinger returned to the United States, where they “would be able to influence the reaction in America.” The invasion began the next day. Here was a “green light” from Kissinger (and Ford). Suharto’s brutal invasion of East Timor resulted in 200,000 deaths.

Argentina: In March 1976, a neofascist military junta overthrew President Isabel Perón and launched what would be called the Dirty War, torturing, disappearing, and killing political opponents it branded as terrorists. Once again, Kissinger provided a “green light,” this time to a campaign of terror and murder. He did so during a private meeting in June 1976 with the junta’s foreign minister, Cesar Augusto Guzzetti. At that sit-down, according to a memo obtained in 2004 by the National Security Archive, a nonprofit organization, Guzzetti told Kissinger, “our main problem in Argentina is terrorism.” Kissinger replied, “If there are things that have to be done, you should do them quickly.” In other words, go ahead with your savage crusade against the leftists. The Dirty War would claim the lives of an estimated 30,000 Argentine civilians.

Throughout his career in government and politics, Kissinger was an unprincipled schemer who engaged in multiple acts of skullduggery. During the 1968 presidential campaign, while he advised the Johnson administration’s team at the Paris peace talks, which were aimed at ending the Vietnam War, he underhandedly passed information on the talks to Nixon’s camp, which was plotting to sabotage the negotiations, out of fear that success at the talks would boost the prospects of Vice President Hubert Humphrey, Nixon’s opponent in the race. After the secret bombing in Cambodia was revealed by the New York Times, Kissinger, acting at Nixon’s request, urged FBI director J. Edgar Hoover to wiretap his own aides and journalists to discover who was leaking. This operation failed to uncover who had outed the covert bombing, but, as historian Garrett Graff noted in his recent book, Watergate: A New History, this effort seeded “the administration’s taste for spying on its enemies—real or imagined.” 

In 1976, Kissinger was briefed on Operation Condor, a secret program created by the intelligence services of the military dictatorships of South America to assassinate their political foes inside and outside their countries. He then blocked a State Department effort to warn these military juntas not to proceed with international assassinations. As the National Security Archive points out in a dossier it released this week on various Kissinger controversies, “Five days later, Condor’s boldest and most infamous terrorist attack took place in downtown Washington D.C. when a car-bomb, planted by Pinochet’s agents, killed former Chilean ambassador Orlando Letelier and his young colleague, Ronni Moffitt.”

It’s easy to cast Kissinger as a master geostrategist, an expert player in the game of nations. But do the math. Hundreds of thousands of dead in Bangladesh, Cambodia, and East Timor, perhaps a million in total. Tens of thousands dead in Argentina’s Dirty War. Thousands killed and tens of thousands tortured by the Chilean military dictatorship, and a democracy destroyed. His hands are drenched in blood. 

Kissinger is routinely lambasted by his critics as a “war criminal,” though has never been held accountable for his misdeeds. He has made millions as a consultant, author, and commentator in the decades since he left government. I once heard of a Manhattan cocktail reception where he scoffed at the “war criminal” label and referred to it almost as a badge of honor. (“Bill Clinton does not have the spine to be a war criminal,” he joshed.) Kissinger has expressed few, if any, regrets about the cruel and deadly results of his moves on the global chessboard. When Koppel gently nudged him about the secret bombing in Cambodia, Kissinger took enormous umbrage and shot back: “This program you’re doing because I’m going to be 100 years old. And you are picking a topic of something that happened 60 years ago? You have to know it was a necessary step.” As for those who still protest him for that and other acts, he huffed, “Now the younger generation feels if they can raise their emotions, they don’t have to think.”

As he enters his second century, there will be no apologies coming from Kissinger. But the rest of us will owe history—and the thousands dead because of his gamesmanship—an apology, if we do not consider the man in full. Whatever his accomplishments, his legacy includes an enormous pile of corpses. This is a birthday that warrants no celebration.



You forget Cyprus here - where he f*cked up NATO as well, not fighting commies.
But Kissinger cannot be called a war criminal, him being just a cog of the Nixon administration, albeit an important one.
That the Soviet Union did not gain huge advantage and conquer the med is because of their own deep systemic problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cosmicway said:

Not a chance.
But with such NATO response if I was Putin I would be in Warsaw - Stockholm - Oslo - Bucharest now.
 

without nukes he could not take Sweden

book it

and no, I am not going to do a massive post on our total defence superstructure (and it IS total, hell, they will pass out battle rifles and anti tank weapons to 80, 85 year olds if need be)

I will leave it at we would be the hardest 10 million person country to invade and conquer without nukes on the planet

we have been planning for Russia to come some day for centuries

plus the cunt would have to push through another insanely hard nation (Finland) to get to us or try a sea invasion via a fucking water buzzsaw, ie the Baltic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Vesper said:

without nukes he could not take Sweden

book it

and no, I am not going to do a massive post on our total defence superstructure (and it IS total, hell, they will pass out battle rifles and anti tank weapons to 80, 85 year olds if need be)

I will leave it at we would be the hardest 10 million person country to invade and conquer without nukes on the planet

we have been planning for Russia to come some day for centuries

plus the cunt would have to push through another insanely hard nation (Finland) to get to us or try a sea invasion via a fucking water buzzsaw, ie the Baltic

Maybe so.
But if NATO is so much afraid of Putin all he has to do is make a shopping list of countries and say to them "let me invade or I use nukes".
But it was n't just the nukes.
The Americans don't want wars.
Also Putin saw how they pulled out of Afghanistan and said "here is the chance".
Finally NATO from all people in the world sent the useless person Liz Truss to Moscow for talks and if Putin had any remaining doubs they were cast aside.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Vesper said:

that line of logic did not end well for the Nazi leaders UNDER Hitler

I don't mean that.
I mean Nixon was in charge and made all those decisions, not Kissinger.
Cyprus might have been an exception because at the time Nixon was watergated and maybe had no idea what was going on.

Edited by cosmicway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, cosmicway said:

I don't mean that.
I mean Nixon was in charge and made all those decisions, not Kissinger.
Cyprus might have been an exception because at the time Nixon was watergated and maybe had no idea what was going on.

That logic does not clear Kissinger.

It's a failed variation of the old Nazi bollocks of 'I was only following orders'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Vesper said:

That logic does not clear Kissinger.

It's a failed variation of the old Nazi bollocks of 'I was only following orders'.

Kissinger was fighting communism.
He believed in the domino theory.
The Soviet Union was trying to influence more and more countries and make them either communist or client states.
Whatever his degree of guilt it is second to Nixon's and in Cyprus they created a real mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lucio said:

Biden couldn't have stopped putin. He's like 90 years old and has dementia 

Team America - Liz Truss - Boris are even worse.
In the old days we had KGB spies but the MI5 was catching a few from time to time.
Now οn their doorbells it says "James Robertson - Russian spy".

Edited by cosmicway
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

Somebodies political beliefs doesn't justify mass slaughter on an industrial scale. 

Cambodia borders South Vietnam from the west, or southern Vietnam we should rather say now.
It was the hideout of the Vietkong from which they were making incursions into South Vietnam.
Given that a bloody war was taking place he had to take some action there and so these things happened.
Overall I dislike Kissinger and of cours after all that he eventually gave Vietnam to the communists
but the mass killings there were done by both sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

Cambodia borders South Vietnam from the west, or southern Vietnam we should rather say now.
It was the hideout of the Vietkong from which they were making incursions into South Vietnam.
Given that a bloody war was taking place he had to take some action there and so these things happened.
Overall I dislike Kissinger and of cours after all that he eventually gave Vietnam to the communists
but the mass killings there were done by both sides.

These countries are nowhere near America and America had no business getting involved. Let these people fight themselves in the jungle who cares. America is such a cringe nation , hope it collapses entirely 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, cosmicway said:

Cambodia borders South Vietnam from the west, or southern Vietnam we should rather say now.
It was the hideout of the Vietkong from which they were making incursions into South Vietnam.
Given that a bloody war was taking place he had to take some action there and so these things happened.
Overall I dislike Kissinger and of cours after all that he eventually gave Vietnam to the communists
but the mass killings there were done by both sides.

That logic suggests it would be OK for Brezhnev and Kruschev to saturate bomb Mexico as they embraced naked capitalism, or for B52s to carpet bomb Athens and Greece into the stone age because of the communist sympathisers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Fulham Broadway said:

That logic suggests it would be OK for Brezhnev and Kruschev to saturate bomb Mexico as they embraced naked capitalism, or for B52s to carpet bomb Athens and Greece into the stone age because of the communist sympathisers

Possible.
Parts of Athens were carpet bombed in 1941 by the Luftwaffe then in 1944 by the RAF who were after German targets but they also hit houses.
The communists aimed at world domination.
This is true notwithstanding the equally traitorous actions of the fascists. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • 0 members are here!

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

talk chelse forums

We get it, advertisements are annoying!
Talk Chelsea relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to run ad's to make sure we can stay online because over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this website and help us by switching your ad blocker off.

KTBFFH
Thank You