

Barbara
MemberEverything posted by Barbara
-
Actually in the post I said André was the man of the match, despite Luiz being the player who contributed more. This match wasn't a tight one for us, but closer matches a performance like the one Luiz had for us is what may feed our attack players. 10 interceptions in a match, most of which moving from the common place, anticipating and taking risks is an out of this world stat. But I agree André was the best. And the opposition was weak, but we made them miserable. Our good performance made them seem much worse than they are - except the Geogie...whatever full back that was marking André. He will have all kind of nightmares involving blond Germans for a month, poor thing. Rapha, there are two kind of assessments here 1) good plays those are rated from 1 to 5. Remember that ball that André brilliantly passed to Oscar and he shot poorly, the ball seemingly going to Budapest? It was a poor finish, but at least he finished, so it's not a detractor and he got a 1 for that finishing. now remember at the end of the first half that he gave a pass to the defense, but it was sloppy, strong and Cech had to get out of the box to clear it because otherwise their player could reach the ball and we could be in trouble? That's a mistake and he was -5. Separating the positive and the negative contribution you have a more realistic view of the match because for example Cole although exchanged tons of passes with André didn't exactly take part of many dangerous plays so he had few contributions and consequently a low rating (19), but he also didn't contribute much negatively either. Sometimes a player can have a bad rating because of mistakes he did when in fact he contributed positively in many other things. At the end of the day he will have been a neutral player contributing and detracting, but when you separate things you can say 'he should get better in X because he already is very good in Y'. Did you open the spoiler section? I decided to put the matches breakdown in a spoiler tag so the post wouldn't be too long - also that is informative the analysis was up in the post. In the breakdown you can see the positive and negative rating clearer
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
well I'm all for debate - although not interested in taking part in this particular one because it seems outdated now that Mata is in the team... they were competing for positions, now they aren't anymore as it seems Mourinho will continue to play them both... It's the fact that your answer had no relation whatsoever with my post that makes me wonder wth you were talking about because I couldn't get how I said comparing last season's stats is unfair to warranty someone replying to me that they aren't saying Oscar should never play... it's a little bit I didn't talk about potential either... I'm talking about present. We should compare their stats now, this season, present time, not 2, 3, 6, 10 months from now, but right now. I said both are closing gaps now, not that they will in x months or seasons from now. The more I read my post and your answer less all of this make sense... I guess it must be the avatar I had (me wearing a Oscar shirt) or the fave player name in my profile because I only made a comment about something I disagree that wasn't even the main point of torontochelsea's post... and then because of info in my profile I guess people are assuming I was picking sides. It's all good though, mate. I was just confused and a bit frustrated with the kind of answer I received for something I thought it was clear in my post. But as we're in this, I think we should play 4-3-3 with Oscar behind the wingers/strikers those being Schurrle, Mata and Torres or Eto'o. In my head he wouldn't be a #10 in that position, but a joker on the team's sleeve performing on different roles during the entire match.
-
no, they just have different profiles and Oscar is more versatile tactically, but I don't think he's more technical than Mata or vice-versa. Different players
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
hehehehehehe you shouldn't refuse them at all by googling it I remember that my fave place to go out in Uberlandia is called 'London Pub' and it really is styled to be a londoner pub... I haven't been there in almost a decade so I can't say how it is these days, but back in my time I loved it.
-
really? It seemed like I was in some sort of harem and everywhere I looked there were pretty girls. I have been in Goiania many times, but I don't remember how the girls look...
-
girls on parties http://www.agitouberlandia.com.br/coberturas/top--nona-edio/2162 I don't know a more recent nightlife pics website... but you can have an idea... but no state beats Santa Catarina. Thanks God I wasn't born there
-
not only you're absolutely right, but the the amount of men in Brazil - let alone good looking - is definitely not enough to attend us My hometown has an average of 1 man for 4 girls (in the 18-34 age demo if I'm not wrong)... and mind you although we also have our share of ugliness as you so nicely put it (in Campinas there's PLENTY of that), in Uberlandia most girls are too pretty (go here goes the tip if you ever want to go to a place where not only there are way more girls than boys, but also good looking girls)
-
Has there been any news on his NT retirement? I remember reading the L'Equipe article about him saying he wouldn't play international football anymore. If that's the case I think he can benefit of the extra couple of weeks training to regain his better fitness. I also think he will play against both Norwich and Cardiff and who knows if Torres will be fit for playing the first match against Schalke... so I think he'll improve with the extra training and another couple of matches.
-
you guys really make me feel self-conscious about my ability to communicate in English... where did I even say who should play there and who shouldn't? Are you sure you didn't quote the wrong person? My only point was that comparing stats from a guy adapting to a completely different and much more demanding football to a guy that has been completely adapted already isn't fair because the former will have his stats damaged because of his adaptation issues... I didn't say Mata or Oscar should play CAM because I got over it the moment Mata started playing well again without being a liability defensively. For me now it doesn't matter as long as the two of them are there. then my second post I exhaustively explained the same thing, being more detailed about what makes it so hard for south american to adapt in Europe and still I didn't say who should and shouldn't play there. Also I commentated on Mata closing the gap by becoming a more complete player under the influence and management by Mourinho and said that Oscar was also closing the creativity gap, although I believe Mata will always be more creative and Oscar will always be the more complete player. Unlike most of you I don't see this as a competition... now that Mata is not only finally performing well again, but also contributing more to the team work-rate I'm too happy to get into petty arguments about who's best because guess what? Both play for Chelsea. So in some matches one will be better than other, while in another bunch of matches it'll be the opposite. I couldn't resist though in my last post commentating that Oscar was statistically better because well, he was... So now use that info and have a field day or lose sleep at night because of that... or you know, just ignore it.
-
did I use the age card? I said you can't compare a player adapting to a complete different style of football especially when he's so young (which makes it more challenging, but the problem isn't the frigging age) to a player that is completely adapted. Overlooking that every south american player has to go through a huge adaptation when moving to Europe, especially England - is ignorance... maybe you guys don't have any idea of what playing in Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, etc is and think that magically the player is ready to play European football. But that has been said (and seen in the pitch) so many times that it never ceases to amuse me how people just ignore it. Did you know for example in Brazil a football match normally has 40-50 fouls and many of them reach 60-70? You know why is that? Because the smallest physical contact here is considered a foul. Also the playing is slower, wider, the pitches are huge, players are used to have huge amount of space to play, etc... how shocking do you think it is to be playing in minimal spaces, where most physical contact is considered normal, in pitches that seem to be as big as my bedroom? How much a difference does it make or how does it affect a players ability to continue to do his thing, especially a midfielder. So the adaptation problem detracted his stats which is why I said we should compare both this season - despite the age gap. I mean people are becoming so blind in their standings that it seems like they don't even bother to try to read posts before jumping to conclusions. btw Oscar was more creative, had more chances created, more vision and more attacking contribution than Mata yesterday. But continue your ...
-
I said it once, and I'll repeat... comparing a 21yo Brazilian first season in Europe - in England nonetheless - with a guy well established there for two season is unfair. we should compare their stats this season... (ignoring the age gap between them). I concede that Mata is much more creative than Oscar, but Oscar is creative himself - just not as much as Mata. He seemed a more balanced player than Juan before Mourinho started to work on Mata tactically. In terms of completeness I can see already Mata closing the gap (meaning Mourinho is making him a better player despite all the shit said about Mata being who he has always been and Mourinho just having to play him because he's Mata). As well as I see Oscar in terms of stats (and even creativity) also progressing right now, but each one will probable continue to be better than the other in what makes them so special - Mata's creativity and Oscar's being a complete player.
-
In the stats article I wrote is the clear evidence of how immense this lad is. Immense! He was absolutely superb and if that isn't a world-class performance I don't what else is! from the article:
-
thanks, that's the objective so they can be contextualized and make more sense. Even then you see Schurrle as only the 5th more influential player in the pitch statistically and he was much more important than that. But on the other hand Ivan's and Luiz's stats can show how important and how they basically made no mistake (Iva literally didn't). So one can conclude that although the opposition was very weak - and they were - defensively we have been immense making the quality gap even more pronounced.
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I won't be doing this for every match... I just didn't know you'll be doing for all matches, Sherri. It's not my job to do it here either (only in CB), I just feel bad because it seems like I took away something you were supposed to do. sorri
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I didn't now you were doing all post-match analysis... my bad... I'm scheduled to do some post-match reports for CB and I thought I would translate them here... I won't get into your business anymore, sweetie
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
it's not sweetie. The kind of scouting you do is different. This is more really rating statically the players for their most important actions in the game (positive and negative) giving them different weight depending on the importance the play have. Then there's a brief tactical analysis. What you do is much more dynamic and less statistical than this. Go ahead and do it
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
from cfc site
-
yeah, it's the opposite... can you fix for me please in the article, I'll fix here. And thanks a lot for reviewing it for me, sweetie Of course I did it by myself Sometimes winning a tackle can be vital others just a stupid stat. I'll be doing this analysis for the Chelsea Brazil site sort of often. I'll translate in English if people around here like it too.
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
for people asking why José hugged André like that (and sort of didn't let him go). Here's what happened the moment Ramires scored. Everyone celebrating and José points to André and then André comes to hug him. José has the same reaction (pointing) at the Lamps goal, but it's not clear (because of the angle, distance and proximity between Willian and Lamps) if he's pointing to Willian or Lampard.
-
Wankers. it remains to be known how many of those 50k aren't 1) Belgians 2) Other English teams supporters 3) Mourinho haters 4) plastic fans
-
@,@CHOULO19, @, I just posted an article (free article), could any of you take a look at it and approve it, please? Thanks
-
I Got The Blues Steaua Bucharest 0 x 4 Chelsea – Champions League 2nd round I Got the Blues is a detailed analysis of best chances created, blocked and conceded by Chelsea players during matches. The feature rates the players’ individual contribution in each of those aspects, in addition to any important mistakes and isolated plays that could be highlighted. The rates vary from 1 to 5 [positively] and -5 to -1 [negatively] and are given individually for each player. Collective plays are also rated in terms of team work and team chemistry showed to build them. At the end all positive rates are summed up – as well as the negative - to provide a more precise assessment of individual performances. Stats rates vary depending on the zone where the duel happened. For example, tackles that created a counter-attack are rated higher than tackles in end zones. The ultimate objective in the analysis is to measure the players’ negative and positive contributions to the match, evaluate tactics employed as well as the collective work and how all of it influenced in the final result. Players total rates total amount of contributions; (negative rate/positive rate): § Cech: 5; (0/21) § Ivanovic: 16 (0/72) § Luiz: 25 (-6/104) § Terry: 11 (-6/45) § Cole: 6 (-10/19) § Ramires: 18 (-2/72) § Lampard: 8 (-8/23) § Mata: 15 (-4/58) § Oscar: 20 (-12/67) § Schürrle: 14 (-2/58) § Eto'o: 11 (-3/40) § Azpilicueta: 1 (0/5) § Willian: 1 (0/5) § Torres: 1 (0/5) Team Chemistry § It was showcased 15 plays where the team’s chemistry was evaluated. 13 out of those were rated 5, while one was rated 4 and another was rated 3. Team Work: § One more play was showcased and the stats are similar with 14 plays rated 5, two rated 4 and one rated 1. Individual highlights: § Ivanovic aerial duels: 10 attempts – 10 won, 0 lost. Ivanovic is the only defender not to make one single mistake during the match. He didn’t give the ball away, positioned himself poorly, failed to tackle and especially he didn’t fail to use his head to kill the opposition attempts to keep the ball. § Luiz pro-activeness: 10 times Luiz anticipated his opponents, intercepting the ball and regaining possession for Chelsea. § Ashley Cole partnership with André Schürrle. They concentrated Chelsea's action in the left side of the field being nearly unstoppable Conclusions: § No player contributed more positively to the match than David Luiz. The Brazilian had 25 highlighted contributions, only two of which negatively. The center back contributed with solid defensive skills, good passes to link up with the attack, but the stat that pops among his contributions is the amount of times he moved from his expected position, and anticipated his opponents, intercepting the ball and regaining possession for Chelsea. He did it ten times during the match. § Even if he doesn’t figure among the most highlighted contributors, André Schürrle was the man of the match taking part is almost all creative, dangerous and effective linkups in the attack. No player had more successful dribbles [or take-ons] in the pitch than Schürrle did. He also provided the width Chelsea have been lacking this season when facing deep defenses and overcrowded midfields. § Mourinho’s tactics seem to become clearer and clearer with each match and also more similar to the ones he had at Real Madrid. Chelsea pressed high in Steaua’s field most of the match [there was a certain relaxation from the 70th minute mark on, where the team was sloppier and probably tired already], having all players involved in the match whether Chelsea has the ball or not. it]. Tactical analysis: As briefly explained above the team seems to be absorbing Mourinho’s philosophy and for the second consecutive time [considering only the second-half against Spurs] they seemed to be solid, objective, fast and determined. At this point Mourinho should be convinced that Ramires is a great addition to the team as long as he strengthens the pivot. Not only the has Brazilian been showing improvement in his first touch and providing a better transition to attack than he did in the past, but he’s also a great presence in the midfield pressing and tackling the opposition. He’s growing into a very effective box-to-box midfielder that relentlessly protects and covers the defense, but who also appears in the attack with one of the team’s best finishing skills. The alternative used by previous managers and twice by Mourinho this season is having Ramires in the right winger, but if anything the first half against Spurs proved that as long as the double-pivot consists of Lampard and Mikel [and probably any combination involving Michael Essien as well], Chelsea can’t control the midfield either because of Lampard slowness or Mikel’s limited vision and ability to buildup attack plays. Also while improved, Ramires first touch isn't good enough for him to be considered a good winger. It’s a lose-lose situation for Chelsea, while having the #7 in the pivot seems like a win-win scenario. With the attacking players pressing high, and the double-pivot covering and protecting the defense, Mourinho’s high pressing plan consists of two stages: 1] try to suffocate the opponent, leading them to resort to long passes and consequently mistakes; 2] regain possession as soon as possible with tackles and interceptions. The first aspect could be seen clearly against Steaua [but also in the second half against Tottenham] and it’s one of the keys for Chelsea to control matches. With a well-posted defense, and David Luiz having freedom to roam around the pitch to offer defensive contributions and anticipate opposition even in the attack field, Chelsea detract the opponents’ possession and pass accuracy. The second aspect of the relentless pressing is to intercept the ball. That’s the main goal and every player in the pitch has to be aware of his surroundings and ready to anticipate the opponents’ move or to get involved in duels, recovering the ball. Mourinho’s style is as far from tiki-taka football as possible and the Portuguese doesn't believe in possession for the sake of it. He wants his team to control the match by putting a lot of pressure on the opponent with and without the ball. With the ball Mourinho wants a fast paced team that will move to the attack objectively, but who also knows how to hold back and start over calmly. Chelsea don’t have and won’t have a target man in the attack in most matches because their manager doesn't like the deep and direct connection [that leads to predictability and is more prone to mistakes] neither does he favor play concentrated in one individual – unless in exceptional talent cases such as Cristiano Ronaldo who he has managed for three years at Real Madrid. As players like his fellow countryman can’t be found at every football academy, Mourinho prefers his team to attack as a block, with as many targets as possible. Here is where the similarities with tikitaka ends. While the never-ending ball possession and pass exchanging aims to have the ball and pass it until a chance presents itself while tiring the opposition [probably also irritating them] and exhausting the defenders as well as the possibilities, Mourinho’s style is much more objective. He doesn't want his team to wait for the chance or the small break to appear, he wants his team to split the opposition apart. Ball possession in his tactics is the mean to the ends, but never the main objective. His team showed today with Ramires, Lampard, Cole, Ivanovic, Terry and Luiz that if the attacking players are well marked, they’ll restart the play in Chelsea's defensive field, only to give time to the attacking players to find the space required to have the play going on forward again – preferably quickly. Mourinho wants his team to favor pace over possession, but not in a predictable and premature way that many times lead to turnovers. Although Schürrle was fixed in the left wing, rarely venturing elsewhere, Oscar and Mata interchanged places between the middle and the right wing. Sometimes one of them even came to the left wing where Schürrle was as a way to offer one more linkup possibilities. Oscar also dropped deeper than Mata – as usual – which strengthens the pivot. While the Spanish seems to be incorporating to the work-rate Mourinho demands when Chelsea don’t have the ball, he mostly left to Oscar the responsibility of going behind the midfield line to start the play when Chelsea do have possession. That’s when the design in the field changes and the formation momentarily goes from 4-2-3-1 to 4-3-3. The double pivot and Oscar drop deep to organize the play and have a panoramic view of the attacking field to distribute the game. Once Chelsea moves forward, the formation switches back to the usual 4-2-3-1 and Oscar has been seen many times linking up with Mata, Lampard, Ivanovic and Eto'o in the middle as well as in the right [although the game didn't pass much to the right wing because of Schürrle’s effective presence in the left]. Many fans may have not understood why at the marks of 78 and 80 minutes Mourinho decided to sub two of his attacking midfielders for one winger and a full back. Some may have thought he wanted to rest Mata and Oscar or that he wanted to give Azpilicueta playing time, but Mourinho may have had an additional agenda. Cole and Schürrle certainly impressed their commander with their constant partnership in the match which was very productive for the team. The same hasn’t been found in the right side and while there could have been many reasons for that, Mourinho may have wanted a more objective answer. Ivanovic’s forte is his defensive skills – reason why he has played countless times as a CB - and while he isn't totally unimpressive attacking, he didn't offer on the right the same Cole offered on the left. The Spaniard full back is a different story. Mourinho used the player that was signed mainly for the right wing [Willian] and the full back that can provide him a more offensive partnership among all options Chelsea have in their current squad. While Azpilicueta seemed to have the freedom to roam around the pitch [he was replacing Oscar after all], most of his actions were concentrated in the right flank where he positioned himself ahead of Ivanovic. Unfortunately in the ten minutes Azpilicueta was there Willian didn't hold position enough to show to Mourinho if he could have the same contribution in the right wing he found in the left with Cole and Schürrle. Mourinho must have ended the day very happy not only with the result – that was vital in Chelsea's Champions League campaign – but also with the answers his team is finally starting to give him. There can still be some individual sharpness issues – especially in the finishing – but tactically the team seemed to finally carry on form and production from one match to the other and seemed more settled and comfortable executing his orders. Below you will find a detailed summary of all plays showcased, in the spoiler tag. Spoiler Data summary First half 0:38 – Fernando Torres tackles the opponent and recovers the ball [this tackle cost him the rest of the match as he got a knee injury in the process]. Ramires and Juan Mata touch the ball before it reaches André Schürrle who fails to complete the cross. Torres 5; Ramires 2; Mata 2; Schürrle 2. Team work and chemistry 3. 1:20 – Branislav Ivanovic wins aerial duel conceding a free throw in a counter-attack. Ivanovic 4 2:14 – Chelsea press Steaua from 1:27 up to 2:14 leading the opponent to leave the attacking half and go back to the defense half, eventually leading to a turnover, as John Terry anticipates the opponent . Terry 5. Team work 5. 2:24 – As Steaua presses and Chelsea can’t move from their defense, David Luiz makes a long pass that reaches Oscar perfectly. A sequence of quick passes is exchanged in the midfield between Oscar, Ramires, Mata and Schürrle, until the German cuts in from the left winger, passes by 4 opponents and shoots. The shot is blocked by the defense and Mata has the rebound, assisting Schürrle whose shot is once again blocked. David Luiz 5, Oscar 3, Ramires 3, Mata 5, Schürrle 5. Team work and chemistry 5. 4:48 – Opponent passes by Ramires entering the box dangerously, but Oscar tackles the opponent, clearing the ball away from the box. Oscar 4. 5:27 – Ashley Cole tackles successfully the opponent in the flank. Cole 5. 5:49 – David Luiz successful long pass to transition from defense to attack, but Oscar’s first touch is weak. Luiz 5. Oscar -3. 7:14 – Luiz clears the ball from the box with a header. Oscar offers yet another turnover, but Ramires recovers the ball. Luiz 5, Oscar -4, Ramires 4. 7:41 – Luiz anticipates his opponent, intercepts the ball, and draws a foul. Luiz 5. 08:07 – Luiz tries a long pass from the defense in an attempt to find Torres in the box. The pass isn’t completed because the defender clears the ball, offering a corner. Luiz 3. 09:16 – Smart exchanged between Oscar and Schürrle near the sideline and Oscar tries a splitting pass for Schürrle, but the goalkeeper is faster and anticipates it. Oscar 4, Schürrle 4. Team work and chemistry 4. 09:38 – Terry wins aerial duel, recovering possession. Terry 5. 10:06 – Ramires can’t control the ball and offers a turnover. Ramires -2. 11:08 – Lampard concedes a turnover. Lampard -3. 11:20 – Ivanovic successful tackle. Ivanovic 5. 11:37 – Mata concedes a turnover. Mata -4 12:41 – Schürrle concedes a turnover in the attack. Schürrle -2. 12:59 – Ramires and Mata press the defenders and earn a throw-in. Team work 5. Ramires 5, Mata 5. 14:18 – Luiz anticipates the opponent intercepting the ball, setting up a counter-attack. Luiz 5. 16:01 – Ivanovic clears a free kick from the box in an aerial duel. Ivanovic 5. 17:08 – Lampard anticipates the opponent clearing the ball to the side line. In the throw-in Ramires anticipates the opponent and recovers possession. Lampard 3, Ramires 4. 17:14 – Lampard concedes a turnover. Lampard -5. 17:23 – Luiz clears the ball from the box with a header. Luiz 5. 17:26 – Schürrle has a successful tackle, recovering possession. Schürrle 5. 18:41 – Ramires intercepts the ball successfully and starts the counter-attack that created Chelsea’s first goal. He passes to Mata who links the play with Schürrle, who advances in the flank and successfully crosses to Eto'o that has trouble controlling the ball, but somehow completes a pass for Ramires to score. Team work 5 and chemistry 5. Ramires 5, Mata 4, Schürrle 5, Eto'o 4. 20:00 – Luiz intercepts the ball successfully feeding a counter-attack. Luiz 5. 20:54 – Another long pass by Luiz attempting to find Eto'o in the box, who was marked by two opponents that were able to clear the ball. Luiz 3. 21:36 – Eto'o, Luiz and Oscar press the opponent until Oscar is able to intercept the ball and start a counter attack. Team work 5. Eto'o 3, Luiz 5, Oscar 5. 22:25 – Ivanovic anticipates the opponent and clears the ball from the box. Ivanovic 5. 23:18 – Luiz interception. Luiz 5. 24:35 – Ramires makes the transition between the defense and the final third, reaching Ivanovic who links up for Oscar to cross, but the ball is cleared by the opponents defense. Chemistry 5. Ramires 5, Ivanovic 4, Oscar 4. 25:31 – Luiz wins aerial duel in the midfield, but Eto'o gives the ball away. Luiz 3, Eto'o -3. 26:17 – Luiz anticipates the opponent in the final third, recovering possession and advancing towards the box, finding Mata who tries to chip the ball over the defense for Oscar, but the defense clears it. Luiz 5, Mata 5. 26:30 – Schürrle successfully tackles the ball inside box, and Lampard links with Eto'o that assists him back, but the defense blocks the shot. Team work 5. Schürrle 5, Lampard 4, Eto'o 4. 26:51 – Schürrle advances in the flank, making a 2-1 play with Mata and shoots at the end of the box way over the goal. Chemistry 5. Schürrle 4, Mata 5. 27:19 – Ivanovic wins aerial duel. Ivanovic 4. 27:35 – Ramires interception completed by Luiz. Ramires 4, Luiz 4 27:52 – Ramires interception. Ramires 4. 28:31 – Successful tackle by Terry. Terry 5. 29:07 – Mata and Eto'o exchange passes in front of the box, and Mata shoots to the goal, but without much danger. Chemistry 5. Mata 4, Eto'o 4. 29: 48 – Mata anticipates the opponent, links with Ramires that passes to Ivanovic who links with Oscar. The Brazilian tries to find Eto'o in the box, but the defense blocks the pass. Chemistry 5. Mata 5, Ramires 3, Ivanovic 4, Oscar 4. 30:06 – Mata anticipates the opponent after Ramires presses. Team work 5. Mata 5, Ramires 4. 31:23 – Terry anticipates the opponents inside Chelsea's box. Terry 5. 33:34 – Oscar wins aerial duel. Oscar 3. 33:50 – Schürrle advances through the flank, passing by an opponent and then by three more, finding Oscar at the edge of the box who shoots poorly. Schürrle 5. Oscar 1. 34:17 – Lampard wins aerial duel. Lampard 5. 38:52 – Luiz and Terry clear the ball away from the box both of which with headers. Team work 5. Luiz 4, Terry 5. 38:57 – Petr Cech punches the ball away from a cross by Steaua. Cech 4. 39:18 – Ivanovic wins aerial duel. Ivanovic 5. 39:22 – Oscar successfully tackles the opponent and links the counter-attack. Oscar 5. 39:47 – Sloppy pass by Oscar offers Steaua dangerous counter-attack, but Cech anticipates it. Oscar -5, Cech 5. 40:24 – Luiz anticipates the opponent and recovers possession. Luiz 5. 42:07 – Ivanovic clears good linkup by Steaua’s attack. Ivanovic 5. 42:25 – Successful tackle by Ramires gives Chelsea a counter attack involving Oscar, Mata, Ramires himself and Schürrle. It ends with Oscar’s shot going a bit too high. Team work 5, chemistry 5. Ramires 5, Schürrle 4, Oscar 4, Mata 3. 43:35 – Ivanovic clears free kick inside the box with a header. Ivanovic 5. 43:36 – Cole takes Ivanovic clearance and links up the counter. Mata gives a superb pass to Eto'o to go in the run. The goalkeeper blocks the striker’s shot, but the defender ends up conceding an own goal in the rebound. Team work 5. Mata 5, Cole 4, Eto'o 4. Second half 45:34 – Ivanovic wins aerial duel. Ivanovic 3. 46:06 – Bad long pass by Luiz. Luiz -2 46:26 – Long pass by Terry. Terry 5. 46:56 – Bad long pass by Terry. Terry -3. 47:27 – Successful tackle by Luiz at the edge of box and pass for counter attack led by Mata who passes to Eto'o to shoot without offering any danger to the keeper. Luiz 5, Mata 4, Eto'o 3. 48:03 – Ramires tackles successfully the ball offering Chelsea a counter-attack. Ramires 5. 49:00 – Luiz anticipates the opposition and recovers possession at the edge of the box starting the counter-attack. Luiz 5. 49:30 – Great pass by Oscar to Mata who runs towards the box and crosses for Lampard, but he can’t finish. Oscar 5, Mata 4. 50:30 – Luiz leaves the box to tackle the opponent and Ramires offering the cover, regains possession. Team work 5. Luiz 4, Ramires 5. 51:28 – Great linkup play between Schürrle and Eto'o, but Lampard can’t control the ball to finish. Chemistry 5, Schürrle 5, Eto'o 5, Lampard 1. 52:24 – Shaky positioning by Terry nearly offers Steaua a chance to score, but the opponent was offside. Terry -3. 53:57 – Successful tackle by Oscar recovering the ball. Oscar 5. 54:25 – Schürrle gets rid of one opponent and advances quickly towards the box. He passes to Oscar, who assists Ramires in the third goal by the Blues. Chemistry 5. Schürrle 5, Oscar 5, Ramires 5. 55:46 – Luiz anticipates the opponent and recovers ball possession. Luiz 5. 57:18 – Oscar wins aerial duel. Oscar 2. 57:41 – Two back heels consecutively by Oscar finding first Ivanovic inside the box and then Mata even higher, but the Spaniard is unlucky by hitting the post. Chemistry 5. Oscar 5, Mata 5, Ivanovic 5. 58:08 – Terry inside the box clears a shot by Steaua. Terry 5. 58:15 – Also inside the box Cole anticipates the opposition and passes to Terry to clear the danger completely. Team work 5. Cole 5, Terry 5. 58:41 – Opponent tries to chip the ball over Cech who recovers quickly making a good save. Cech 4. 62:23 – Oscar anticipates the opponent in the midfield linking a counter-attack. Oscar 5. 62:52 – Luiz wins a tackle in the defensive field. Luiz 5. 63:04 – Long pass by Luiz finding Eto'o in the counter attack with Eto'o who finds Schürrle. The German passes by two opponents, but the finish is poor. Luiz 5, Eto'o 4, Schürrle 3. 65:44 – Ivanovic wins an aerial duel, setting up a counter-attack. Ivanovic 5. 69:09 – Ivanovic wins aerial duel at the edge of the box. Ivanovic 5. 69:37 – Good linkup play started by Mata to Oscar, then to Ramires and finally to Schürrle, who couldn’t shoot on target. Chemistry 5. Mata 3, Oscar 3, Ramires 4, Schürrle 3. 70:33 – Ivanovic wins aerial duel in the midfield. Ivanovic 3. 72:02 – Terry anticipates the opponent recovering ball possession. Terry 5. 72:25 – Luiz blocks opponent cross/shoot at the edge of the box, after shaky positioning by him. Luiz 3. 72:35 – Cole loses aerial duel in the box, offering a dangerous chance for Steaua, but Cech saves. Cole -5. Cech 4. 74:26 – Ivanovic wins aerial duel in the defense. Ivanovic 5. 75:32 – Good ball control and link up involving all attacking and midfield players, ending with Eto'o finishing with a volley in an assist by Lampard, saved by the goalkeeper. Team work 5, chemistry 5, Eto'o 4, Lampard 5. 78:54 – Luiz anticipates the opponent and recovers possession in the midfield. Luiz 5. 82:50 – Ramires wins a tackle in the defensive half. Ramires 5. 83:06 – Ashley Cole intercepts the ball. Cole 5. 84:06 – Cole can't complete a pass, offering a counter attack, demanding a good defense by Cech. Cole -5, Cech 4. 86:24 – Sloppy pass by Luiz in the attack half gives the ball away. Luiz -4. 89:02 – César Azpilicueta anticipates the ball and links the counter-attack with Eto'o who links the play by crossing to Willian at the other side of the box. The Brazilian passes back to Lampard to score. Team work 5, chemistry 5. Azpilicueta 5, Eto'o 5, Willian 5, Lampard 5. Click here to view the article
- 23 replies
-
- scouting
- tactical analysis
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
that was exactly the pass I meant. Thanks boys
-
and he had a first-touch turned long-pass that was really brilliant. something that I hope someone can put in a vid or gif. He was in the left-mid and put the ball in the edge of the box in the right, right in Iva (I guess, not sure) foot. Magic.