Wilkins is a nice guy, but completely clueless about tactics, formation and performances of players. If he had it his way, Drogba, Terry, Lampard, Ballack, Essien and Carvalho will all be here in there 40s
Also, you have Luiz and Lamprd in the pivot, two players who want to get forward all the time, another big risk if they can't decide who stays in midfield.
From the way he kept giving interviews in the summer about how his "development" has been stagnanted by Chelsea (http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/339875/Romelu-Lukaku-s-parting-shot-at-Chelsea - and he did this several times from, about May, someeting getting to the point of irritaton.) and th fact that most top clubs employ a system with one striker he i doubt he will want to keep being sent on loan or playing second fiddle to Falcao or another striker if they become a hit.
But if we get Falcao and he becomes a hit goal scoring wise then Lukaku will beccome a bit obselete until Falcao leaves (which may be for a few years), he is not going to wait that long to be Chelsea's main striker. If his first touch has not improved then I do fear for him. From what I have seen and the way he plays, his first touch and overall ability to control the ball wil prevent him (imo) of being able to performe at a top club trying to win trophies. I mean jut look at Trres and how everybody frwns apon the way he controls the ball, Lukaku will have the same issues.
How is his first touch? I hope it has improved becuase during pre-season (and the chances he got last season) it was absolutly dreadful and I feel that will really be a dsiadvantage to him.
Actually I have not seen anyone comment on how versatile he is. He can play in the holding midfield role, in a double pivot, as a centre midfielder, an attacking midfielder, playing off the striker. and he has even been deployed as a striker a couple of times (FA Cup final). And with his height and strength I bet he could be deployed as a makeshift centre back in extreme emergencies. So he could be worth the money if we don't see him as purely a defensive midfielder.
But that envolves several causes, such as plying on reduce wages (I don't think Giggs was ever payerd over £120,000 or even £100,000) which I don't think he would accept, plus its easier to say then do and I think he has said that he wants to still be a focul point of the team for two or three years more, something that is not really possible. Edit: Here is the article http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/dec/13/chelsea-frank-lampard-free-agenthttp://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/dec/13/chelsea-frank-lampard-free-agent
Awful in the first half, could not control the game, but Mata got an early second half goal, Leeds deflated and the quality of the three Am ran them over. Would not use them in that pivot against tougher opposition.
He has had a couple of hit and hope shots, but like on Sunday he is getting overun and can do nothing but just make runs to the box, hoping to get on to loose balls then contributing to the midfield. And get Hazard for Mata, has not been able to get into the game much.
Hopefully I'm wrong and that the Lampard-Oscar pivot will work wonders, but alas I think it will be even worse then the Corinthians games in terms of controlling the midfield.