Mundaka

About Lukaku, the odds of him totally failing at Chelsea are like zero, this is because, even if he has a bad game, he still has the physique (that wont go away) and mentallity to go for it, and if he's out of form he's the kind of guy that will just start working harder on the field to make up for it. Next to this, as you couldve seen in our last game, we have more use for a striker with high workrate/works for the team with movement off the ball(keeping defenders buzy for mazacar) than someone who will hold the ball long/starts shooting on the goal from impossible angles, make some awesome goal now and then and what not. Also some say we need a targetman with good technique to help us in our linkup play, you should really check out how often we use our ST to link up while we counter...

Can you quit your random trolling? At least make it interesting for us and give some good arguments with it.

I would go for : And then against united Azpi Terry Luiz Cole Mikel Ramires Mata Oscar Hazard Ba

His + Oscar's crossing and lukaku's heading could become quite undefendable

Yeh he made the difference for us there, prolly his best performance so far

Yeh they made the safest "bet" and a good/succesfull one, but its doubtfull he wouldnt have been able to play much games here already considering the amount of games we played this age/what we lack in pivot. And he was already quite good before the year started or he wouldnt have gotten the role he had at werder from the start i think .

And nearly all of them make more than 110k/week so what the heck is your point, apart of the attempt to name players you think are at the moment better than Hazard?

His stats posted 1/2 pages ago prove otherwise. And did you even saw him playing already in our NT? Every single game he participated he did well so you wouldnt say so.

The Daily Mail seems to be their source. OT: seems unlikely.

2:20,5:30, 6:25, 6:40 crosses, arguably better than pirlo's already.

They agreed on the transfer/ hazard wages but they didnt want to pay the 3-5M? to hazards agent And if Hazard aint worth 110k/w , who in the Premier League is worth his wages i wonder???

Yeh he actually is, Eden Hazard needs players who understand his play/are also technical around him to really shine (else he has to do it all by himself) so KDB getting better will also be good for Hazard and i kinda expect Hazard to explode for the first time in our NT this week

Obviously. But for me spending, what are the numbers, 40-90M? on a position we already have worldclass players for is really not needed

I see, if thats the cast we could even pick him up at 20/30M i guess next year? But doesn't Barcelona have a clause orso? Really im not following the whole neymar transfar-saga so i have no idea.

Pay for?

And as for Neymar, i havent seen him playing enough to make a real opinion, but i wouldnt spend that much on any AM/winger atm, we already have mata, hazard, oscar, kdb... I really think we should focus on other places in squad first (unless you wanna use him as false 9...)

I think your all understimating the french league here... it wasn't that long ago teams like lyon beated Madrid... Also Hazard had quite some experience before joining us... He won as first foreigner the young player award, won it twice ever (also first one to achieve that) + was the youngest ever to be named young player of the year while making a team champions for the first time in 60 years... And well Hazard also played in the CL/EL, you cant really compare the french league with the brazilian... the french is one of the best defensively in europe.

There are no other Lukaku's...stats say so at least.

This, I rather splash on a really good central midfielder + as squad players: a central defender that can also play as a left back and a striker (tevez type)

Who we will select as next manager will be the most important transfer of the season.

What we do can see already, we would have an amazing crossforce with KDB & Oscar on the fields

Well he sure looks spectacular like that but he would'nt get the same amount of key passes / dribbles per game at chelsea tho, although then again his passing % and crossing % would be higher here... so dunno how good that comparison is. Still amazing stats

We should really be able to give (hidden) dislikes aswell and when a post gets 30 orso it gets removed. Great read, totally forgot he even scored against RSCA .

Would be strange if he wouldnt have made players better at all after those years... but the way we played yesterday is not his style, at all, and certainly not something he teached Hazard in a few weeks...and i compare with teams that play very fluid football as in ajax, dortmound, barcelona, lille, brazial clubs, Belgian/Holland/Brazilian/Chili NT's... You can (try to) be tactically flexible, but still be rigid btw...(fe Mansitty) Ow andscoring goals and being rigid has nothing to do with eachother anyways, like you mentioned, look at RM + your list of his victory's/tactics n stuff seems nice and all but is really next to the point...

http://sporza.be/cm/sporza/voetbal/buitenland/Engeland/130318_Hazard_lof Lampard: He's 22 years old and the world is at his feet, he can handle the pressure because he's that good. He's a fantastic lad, very relaxxed which you can see in his game. He has loads of technique and pace, something every good attacker has. He reminds me of Zola, although its a bit too early, but he can also become a world-beater. It's a pleasure to play with him. He really seems to like our hazard West Ham coach Sam Allardyce: I'm the first to blame my own players for the errors they made but Hazard was unstoppable, he is just too good. He passes defender whenever he feels like, he lured them every time. He's also clinical, 2 feeted and very fast and good in small space. It was a hell of a job trying to hold him back.