Mundaka

Ow? nice one source?

And why not? If he would only use his physique ok, but thats not the case at all.

Yes and like i said before, it's very usefull to have experience to play a makelele role. (which i already said on the last page...) I took 4-3-3 since most of the people here on the forum (you can see that in various topics) seem to want to go for 4-3-3/dont understand why we stick with 4-2-3-1. Also with me wanting to sign yaya i'm actually saying we should give Chabolah a chance... If we would sign someone like lets say de rossi/ witsel, he would be here for the long run prolly and i doubt Chabolah would play any time soon for us...

Dont ignore my argument of the single DM btw with you going for a 4-2-3-1 with nice Mikel protection... Next to this, wow , really wow, he will become the best DM ever then if he's already good enough without playing a game against strong oposition in a role like that...

Just read my full sentence.... And to point it out: The defensive part, interceptions, gamereading & actiontaking at specific situations (aka experience) is not that good already @ chabolah who's just 18 and hasn't played a decent oponent yet, you cant be serious to want him to be a DM in a 4-3-3 with 1 DM (which is what most of us are aiming for no?).

Chabolah is not ready yet to run things in a midfield like that and it would be the worst position to have someone unexperienced playing. Toure is 29, which means Chabolah can easely succeed him, when he's 32 Chabolah is 21, in meanwhile he can also learn of one of the best in that position so great no?

Then on this very moment: Courtois Ferdinand-Kompany-Vertonghen Gerrard-Witsel Mirallas-KDB-Hazard Rooney-Benteke

Yeh ok , i'm also quite fond of Hart, but i do understand if harneth already thinks hes better, stats will prove they are pretty close anyways

Prolly because he has the most clean sheets in the primera division (at the age of 20 which is very young for a goalie...) or he has the clubs record of longest clean sheet? Is a decent reason to think he's better, i'm not claiming he already is for the record.

Mata's conversion rate is high...

Winger: Walcott/Lennon Walcott/Lennon over Hazard/DeBruyne/Mirallas/Mertens?

Why head to head? I like to think of us as england 2 Anyways on topic: I would only pick their backs over ours.

"I have other things to do during my weekends," says he. "But it so happens that last week, I saw two Chelsea matches. "

Should slap him for not including me

He played the DM role at barcelona (alone) when they were at their best (as a team)... i think he will do fine.

+ have you seen City's list of players they want to sell? I really doubt they are going to be difficult this transferseason else they'll end up paying more wages for their reserves than their actual squad.

Yeh any complaints about us belgians you can forward to CptSting.

Exactly what we need... ------- Yaya ------- ----Oscar-KDB---- Mata--------Hazard i mean.. rly

Those that followed De Bruyne since his debut at Genk will totally agree with you, De Bruyne has exceptional skills, everything you can't achieve by hard work/experience he has already, at high level, every team he went to, Genk/NT/Werder, he made an immediate impact as if he was there for years already. Its crazy how fast he learns, Hazard has in comparison with De Bruyne, played more games at high level so its obvious Hazard is to be considered better now. But still, if you look at how he did at genk (made them champions, with courtois) at the age of 19 (Courtois was 18) and those 2 were squadplayers at the start of the season and ended as keyplayers/championship winners at the end. And the odds of Genk winning it weren't exactly high. That's one the reason's we compare him with Cruyff, also for him it all looked friggin easy. If i were to compare him with one player now, it would be Pirlo, one of the major disadvantages of Pirlo is his physique (kinda the bottleneck of De Bruyne also, but he improved on that part big time in the Bundesliga, those germans sure train hard ) all other stuff, non physique related, like tackling he can do with ease/flair, same with De Bruyne. But the difference with Pirlo and De Bruyne is that De Bruyne is like 3 years ahead of Pirlo at the same age.... see where im getting at? As for the comparison with Hazard and De Bruyne, in raw talent, De Bruyne has more to offer, but Hazard will always triumph in physique (kinda the same with messi vs ronaldo really), and well another big difference in favor of Hazard at the moment is his crazy technique, but i think De Bruyne can come close in that department. Ow and which Belgian players you liked?

top 5 for me so far: hazard goals vs manutd /aston villa/prague mata vs newcastle oscar vs juve

Our government/law is way too complex, everything goes too slow and most of them aren't worth being in it, we have way too many of them anyways, they never seem to agree on any major issue's (or it is way to late when it happens) so yeh, we pretty much have the worst government possible, and most of us dont even care about them anymore.

Welkom!

This has already been discussed around page 75-77 by the way, Why would we want to get rid of KDB for Shurrle, it wouldnt make sense, especially since we have more use for KDB. Btw, the conversion rates of mata and hazard are (very) high... higher than ronaldo's fe.