

Mundaka
MemberEverything posted by Mundaka
-
Would go for gustavo then instead of kaka imo, would balance things more
-
Who's on brazils bench? nvm got it! Diego Cavalieri 14 Dante 19 D. Costa 17 Hulk 15 L. Gustavo 16 Filipe Luis 18 Osvaldo 13 Jean
-
Not better than vince the prince! And well i dont know him enough to really rate him
-
Goh dunno, wouldnt trade any cb for kompany, dunno if he's better than vertonghen
-
Wouldn't mind alves/marcelo in our nt sup with neymar/kaka tho
-
Heard during our last NT game that De Bruyne ran 12 km's/game @ Werder, never imagined that would happen, if you consider physique is his weakest point..
-
Player Focus: Chelsea Have the Brains but Not De Bruyne
Mundaka replied to Melanicus's topic in Chelsea Articles
About those stats, here at chelsea they wouldve been a bit different (depending on the role also) but pass/cross % would be higher(better players here), dribbles prolly lower, since they compare them with our chelsea AM's. Next season he's prolly going to explode i think, here or at loan... And if we want to use mazacar + KDB we will have to play 4-3-3 i guess. -
I know, but even then it wasn't fair, since you made it seem he was total crap on that department which isn't true. And i edited that post btw, i don't mind but i just woke up and was in a hurry so nvm that. And its was a fair assesment after you said that.
-
Only thing i was discussing with you was if he's an abysmal passer or a least a decent one. (and i think which one is obvious) And well again, i wouldn't, but his tackling/interceptions are just great, so i know why if they would consider him. (and this is the last time im saying this, i wouldn't) It doesn't seem like you know much of him anyways...
-
And pass % won't even say that much, if your a type of player that plays lots of balls deep/direct then your pass % will prolly be lower ythan when you always play it to the guy next to you... anyways fellaini's stats in general: And its clear to see that his best points are: aerial duels, tackles (everton aren't getting the best out of fellaini defensively tho) and scoring goals. Hence why i want him to play as box to box (but not for chelsea, unless we replace mikel which i wouldn't do, like i said before). Also worth mentioning is his final 3rd passing/creating chances skills. and im quoting: "Perhaps most impressive is the clear-cut chances category with last season’s total of five already bettered this campaign(6). Creating a clear-cut chance every 571.2 minutes in 2011/12, this season’s figure of 194.2 minutes is comparatively brilliant."
-
Yeh and those stats are partially based on when he played as a striker, you can't look at that imo...even then, considering he played almost 1/2 as a striker those start are good lol, they are prolly around 85-87% as midfielder, especially if he would play it here, and who say's he needs to be? As a box to box player his passing is more than good enough. And even if its a youtube vid, it already proves enough, he can pass a friggin ball.
-
He can friggin pass, just not good enough for us, it's not what we need, but saying he can't pass is plain stupid. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZFuxC1bdUk
-
I was quoting someone else talking about Belgian NT , and in our NT witsel should play as DLP, fellaini as box to box if witsel, fellaini and dembele would play together. I didn't say he should come, do mind the IF in that sentence, and IF he comes he can only be usefull as replacement for mikel because his passing isn't good enough as DLP or be used as 2nd striker...
-
No idea, he barely speaks with the press anyways.
-
Somehow doubt that, given his past actions.
-
Well we try to have one i guess, Abramovich wanted attractice football, and to make more use of / invest more into youth. That the board fails is something else, although their signings were overall good i would say.
-
It depends, if he will follow Chelsea phylosophy more or less (offensive play/use our talents) then yeh sure, if not there are better options out there for us.
-
Petrs giraffe!
-
Well lets say he's comming close,we are comparing La Liga's best vs PL best goalie of this season... Courtois is already one of the best goalies around tho, and will prolly be the best in 5 years, it would be a shame to not see him play here at Chelsea then. As for belgium, we can be really happy with him so far imo, we only conceded one so far this campaign and thats solely down to Courtois, with almost any other goalie we wouldve had some more in at least...
-
Not really, you dont have to build the entire team around him, the exact opposite even... You have to use him as box to box, instead of DLP, that was the difference between the first 30 minutes and the remaining 60 for fellaini. He's awesome in recuperating, getting in the box & score goals, battle opposition midfielders... but dont give him the ball to much when we have possesion, if he comes here it should be as replacement for mikel/2nd striker. But indeed, for us/chelsea we're better of with Witsel fe since we aim for lots of possesion.
-
Right, dion/romper enjoy your festival! Do they stream that? Would like to catch queens of a stone age if so But well pm me if so? Im off, going to watch django unchained, big QT fan.
-
-
+ Our best input ever, beer! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Belgium Thats one we're pround off, beer = art here.
-
And then we have our waffles, each city has their own type (liege waffles, brussels, antwerp)
-
You see now ^^