Ok maybe I shouldn't have said the bad example thing. But to say that I haven't contributed anything meaningful is stupid. From what I remember all people were doing here was insult us as bushman pointed out: From what I remember all Cicerco and Jay C and the rest posted were things like "you are mad", "you are stupid", "how can there possibly be corruption in the PL", "Corruption in PL, No way". If you find these claims which are supported by nothing more 'meaningful' then what I said, then you seriously shouldn't be a judge cos you might put the wrong person in jail. As a matter of fact I posted two very meaningful posts with facts, pictures and videos about Man United: http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/98-the-english-football-thread/?p=737906 http://forum.talkchelsea.net/topic/98-the-english-football-thread/?p=737913 If my posts were so 'meaningless' then why did they receive likes? As a matter of fact, the 'other posts' were more meaningless. Most of them were as I said nonsense like: "There cannot be corruption" or "You are stupid". I find these posts more stupid and they are made even more stupid because there was no reason behind these claims. People have been praising Cicerco so much but WHS made this awesome post Your original post was that you had to read through 7 pages of nonsense about United. If you have problem, don't read it. Simple. Also if you noticed we stopped arguing about Man United a while back. Dunno why you just posted that. It's like starting the whole argument again.