So? That would be a totally different debate... What people suggested was a simple seat renovation in the two sections behind the goal, nothing more. Something provisional for people to be able to legally stand in a hypothetical scenario where the FA allowed it. The increase of capacity is a whole other discussion and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with making the two lower stands behind the goal seat-less. Stadiums should be democratic places and a standing stand will help make Stamford Bridge more accessible to a priced-out fan base! The club wont have how to justify 50 quids for a section you cant even seat. So more people will be able to pay for it! (and that is not even counting the noise factor). If you still want to sing, there is Shed Upper and MHU for it....I know you will quote me complaining you dont want to do that either, but I dont give a flying fuck for you seating at halftime if that will bring positive returns for the club. I know that, but it isnt the same as having an official standing section and you know it! People get more creative and excited when they have no option but to stand. And I believe you! I know fuck all about it, I have never been there. If you tell me it is impossible to do so, I will have to shut up and accept it. But that is not what you said, you said you dont want to because it doesnt bother you and you want to sit down at halftime... I want it because I think it will make the stadium better (even though I have never watched a game live): SB would have Shed Lower and MHL for the more hardcore and/or poorer fans.Shed Upper and MHU for those who still to participate but with a decent level of comfort. And the two middle stands for families, business man, tourists, etc. I personally think it would be much better and appeal to a broader audience!