Rmpr

NOOOOO, the pub has been a really cool place to hang out in the past few weeks, do not ruin it!

Saying a manager should choose a lower team instead of a top one just because it is a lot harder is hypocritical... Anyone in their position would do the same. Sorry, you might try to fool yourself, but you would not say no to 10mi/year and title chances to risk your carrer in a "challenge" at a Championship team. You got caught up with the MacDonalds analogy, but I am sure you got the point and understood it.

Why managers need to get real difficult challenges to proof themselves and everyday workers dont? It is like finding a job, if you are offered a job at a very top company, with resources and excellent wages, why do you need to choose to be a cashier at McDonalds? Too prove your real vallue? Very hypocritical...

This will never happen, you need background to be able to do a great job (money to be more specific). It is not about being smart, it is about creating a name. Then, the good job opportunities will come. You talk like their only quality is chosing where to manage, like if doing so they are automatically winners. There is a lot of hard work in it too. Also, they are not smart in what they do, everyone would do the same. The difference is that they have climbed their way up (without resources at first) and now they can comfortably choose the best option. You talk like Mourinho is a winner because he knows how to choose where to go and Harry Redknapp isnt because he doesnt. It is not like this! Harry would have gone to Real or Chelsea if we was offered such jobs, but he wasnt and Jose and Rafa were...

What did you say?

I was going to laugh at Welbeck, then I remembered we have Torres.

No, that seems like cheering for Liverpool to equalise!

You are cheering for Liverpool? I want a draw...

2-1 FUCK YEAH!

Just woke up.! Manure leading...

Oh Spike, even drunk I am a better searcher than you! Nadine Bastos

i DONT KNOW WHO THE NEXT MANAGER IS GOING TO BE, BUT HE AINT GONNA BE FAT...

Only Brazilians are capable of doing such wonders! No, not really. It is a Brazilian Futsal Player...

He is getting closer, come on!

I really want Falcao, but I dont want Fellaini.

explain, please? Anyways, it was a bad joke old man!

When it comes to her, we grasp on everything we possibly can!

Nah, it is all fine!

@, what is our longest winless streak at home since Roman?

I really dont get you...

Maybe I am just too harsh... I would give it a 10/10 for the result and a 7/10 for the performance. I dont think it was bad or normal, I just think it wasnt more than good.

Thanks, I thought it was something around 30. Muzchap likes too much, dont bother!

But what does it have to do with me saying the comments wouldnt be so positive? The goalkeeper is there to make saves, we cant play the "if he hadnt save" game. I can also make a case that Stoke missed a penalty and could have scored early on. We have to analyse and conclude based on what happened and not on what might have happened... All I am saying is that people look at the result and jump to conclusions, either way too negative or way too positive. It does not work like that!

Yeah, I mean, if only counted the second half, the performance would have been great. In the course of 90min it was good, nothing impressive.

He has 50 likes and still runs out of likes? How much is mine? Or is it 50 for everyone?