Stingray

Tem lá calma né... Não precisas de vir para aqui prarafusos com mel mas se tens alguma cena a dizer maçanetas apimentadas Yes what? Especially since you quoted me? Id appreciate english. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

You have Aftari already? Otherwise i will not talk redtube, my friend!

Yes. It just doesnt work when you have a redtube account.

Id just go clean with the id. Tapatalk needs an id - it can be different from your forum id (i am a sexy girl sometimes). Then couple your tc account. No?

Of course not. It would be your identical twin sister. Thats incest !! Didn't you guys learn anything loooool !!

I bet he is the kind that goes all gung ho, then drops from his set, drops his pants, pass out and puke. Then tell you he loves you. Ladies: if i was gay. I'd marry Choulo19 !

Wut is sex?? In my culture there is none. For a drink:

Amicus certus in re incerta cernitur Thanks for the friend request.

Here you go : non vi, sed saepe cadendo

Ok Cercei , I got u covered

Bullshit. I never made this a religion debate. So 'Tom' didnt think 'unfairly' it had to do with religion. I call your bluff: show me where i said that? Also: you didnt fix anything. You just want to let the 'public opinion' on here think that. Close, but no cigar, miss.

Not here. That would be window dressing.

I am no sweetie. Don't degrade me like that, i find it offensive. If i was a girl and yo a man, there would be a sexual harrassment charge.

Of course you think that. Your benchmark is the bible. Talk about being pretentious in claiming that can should be he truth. As I said and I meannit, i am out of here, i hate it and you know very well why I do.

Here: http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php Bash away. I will. Bye. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

the fact remains it's very difficult for people who aren't part of Muslim culture to understand how the values are completely different and how for them many things that apply to occidental world don't apply to them. So they take their western studies and try to make it fit in all cultures where it mainly only applies to occidental culture in general... regardless of where that reaches. It doesn't reach some of the Muslim world, tribes in Africa, some Asian cultures. But still they label the entire humankind and put it into their so small box. Thats nonsense to the max. In our case we had researchers from the culture itself doing the research. We had translations and backtranslations. In total more than 300 cultures. The HRAF database has more ethnic diversity in researchers than th research. You are propagating a popular but very faulty view. You must like that. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Ah yes, I've read about this before. But like I said, the mechanism speaks about avoidance of people who you spend your early life with. Exactly, that is the best way we hace to recognize kin. And this is an evolutionary mechanism. But a very fast and frugal one ..... It makes errors. Also: the taboo in itself is something we do in a rotual context. It always happens that way ... If we eat the 'body of Christ' in church. It is the same ... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

There is nothing weird or Lamarckian about my ideas. 1. Is incest wide spread? No. Check the HRAF database. The worlds biggest database on ethnographic, historical and anthropological material. 2. Is incest avoidance universal? Yes. Check Donald Brown's world renowned scietific list of human universals. Google is your friend. 3. Is the work of Debra Lieberman a - mere possibility? No, it is amongst the finest work in psychology the last decade and is also thus regarded among scientists. It is an empirical work that doesnt rely on a 'gene' for anything. That is a pure strawman attack. Instead, google Westermarck hypotheses if you want to know the mechanism in which pur brain deciphers our 'kin'. You don't need a gene. You have genes that build brains, brains that have computatinal algorithms. Algorithms that - yes - install an avoidance mechanism. Just because the mechanism is fast and frugal doesnt mean it cannot make errors. Some people actually live a sibling in a sexual way. This does not falsify the hypotheses. 4. You said avoidance of homosexuals ..... So i wanted to joke actually that the only reason to avoid them is to not get your butt hurt. Do we have a gene for homosexuality. No. It is an epigenetic thing. Somethingi expalined in here a long time ago. hutcho found it boring :-) so i will not repeat. 5. Is my reasoning Lamarckianist? No. That is quite the insult :-). It is a purely adaptationist way of thinking. One in which you use teleological language, but that is standard in the field. Enough of this. I get annoyed. Ps: ow ..... I just finished my last two days at work debatig evolution against fundamentalistic mulsims. So excuse me I dont feel all that happy about the subject. I am in the mood for some religion bashing though. Who takes it up? My tolerance level for dogmatic stupidity has reached a new low. Try me. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

See what happens when im gone!!!

I'm not saying that humanity started from Adam and Eve! LOL Just that it is present in various religions, meaning it was part of society. It was present in most documented ancient societies including many famous plays from Ancient Greek. I think it much more common than you think. There are tons of people who would argue for the legalization of consensual incest in a lot of countries in western Europe. It is even legal in several like Netherlands, France, Spain and Russia. So it is no way comparable to cannibalism. But let me ask you a different question: Do you think that homosexual avoidance is also an evolutionary self-defense mechanism? I will answer when im home - i even parked my car to reply to this. Its just that because it is in plays doesnt mean it isnt rare. I base my opinion of anthropological material, not a guess or an imprsession as that is prone to many biases. There is an evolutionary reason to install an avoidance mechanism - if you do it there is SUBSTANTIAL risk for offspring. All recessive genetic deficiencies become active... There is no such reasons to avoid homo's. it doesnt alter your genetic fitness.

I'll read that later. But how can it be a taboo due to evolution when it was common practice a mere few thousand years ago? Very much documented in ancient Greece and Egypt. It is part of many ancient religions. Even Christianity, if humanity started from Adam and Eve having sex and kids, then how did all the human race expand if those kids didn't have sex with each other or with their parents? Even in today's societies, it is too common to be taboo by human nature/instinct. First, i dont believe humanity started from adam and eve. Also they werent brother and sister. It was comon in egyptian royal dynasties for some time. It generated a lot of genetic problems. It was probably much more forced than we think. On being comon: actually not true. Anthropology documents incrst taboo to be a human universal. The stories about its occurence are fabulations. Pretty much the same as canibalistic stories. So ... Incest is very rare, reserved for ceremonial occassions...

Incest avoidance is a very biological thing. I doubt many would do it http://scholar.google.be/scholar_url?hl=nl&q=http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.140.8222%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm1jiHaZx1wFsDPYBrLaIYuyQWuzsg&oi=scholarr&ei=zkblUaG7AYvWPYzygIAN&ved=0CC0QgAMoATAA More info ... She's an ex collegue specializing in this : http://www.debralieberman.com/html/research.html

Size doesnt matter that much. It is not the size of the wave but the motion of the ocean that rocks the boat. @barbara will probably know this

Yeah, maybe Belgium could be the second best footballing country in the world then Looooool !!! After argentinia you mean ?

Belgium is so small. I used to mock my belgian friend about that, hahahaha. I mean, São Paulo (the city, not the state) has about as many people as your whole country. Just imagine the amount of talent coming out if our country was as big as Brazil!